MAKNA MEDIASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

Art. 95(4) Law No. 28 of 2014 re. Copyright determines that mediation should be the preferred choice to settle copyright disputes, including those that relates to piracy and plagiarism. The issue to be discussed here is what would the legal consequence be in case this alternative dispute settlement is not utilized by disputants. This problem will be discussed using a juridical normative approach. Here, mediation is understood in the context of Law No. 30 of 1999 re. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 re. Mediation Procedure in Court Proceedings. The main finding of this legal research is that mediation, by law, should be offered in court or may be used out of court at any time by disputants, in civil dispute (claim for compensation) as well in criminal cases. Non utilisation does not have as consequence the cessation of existing court proceedings.

Kekuatan Pembuktian Suatu Surat Pernyataan Bermaterai Dalam Sengketa Keperdataan di Pengadilan

In every civil dispute in the court, it is often to find a statement letter with a seal on it, which is used in other to proving or claiming a person's rights, nevertheles how is the legality in a civil trial? This writing is conducted in order to describe the evidentiary force of a letter made on a stamp duty through normative legal research method by examining problems normatively using a conceptual approach. A stamped statement is a privately made deed as evidence and filed in a civil dispute in court. It can have the full evidentiary force as long as the party in the letter acknowledges its veracity. Keywords: Evidence, Stamped, Civil Dispute

Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Atas Karya Motif Batik Galuh Di Kabupaten Gianyar

Legal protection for intellectual works is not only shown to works whose copyright has been registered, but also to those whose copyrights have not been or are not registered at all. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal protection of Galuh batik motifs in Gianyar Regency according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning copyright and to find out the copyright registration for Galuh batik business in Gianyar Regency. The author uses the type of empirical legal research, namely research by means of interviews which primary data are known as field research. The data needed in this study are primary and secondary data. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the legal protection of Galuh batik motifs in Gianyar Regency based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning copyright, namely Galuh Batik has not received optimal legal protection. If in the future there is a dispute, then the Batik Galuh Party can take it with a Civil Dispute settlement. The registration process for Batik Galuh copyright still uses a manual system and the process is completed in less than 3 weeks to 1 month.

Esensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata melalui Mediasi Nonlitigasi

There are legal issues in the society which resolved through a non-litigation mediation process, especially in civil disputes, where there are several factors that influence people prefer to settle legal issues through non-litigation aspects rather than resolving cases by litigation or through the court. This article aims at explaining how the principles and stages of civil dispute resolution through non-litigation mediation and the essence or value that can be used for the society in dispute. So it can be concluded that this article wants to explain that non-litigation mediation in principle has a consensual as well as collaborative nature, so the result will have win-win solution for each sides, so that the problematic side is cannot be harmed. Then there is a very large value which can be taken, if several problems that arise in society, especially in civil cases which resolved through non-litigation mediation aspects.

TINDAKAN CONTEMPT OF COURT DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DI INDONESIA DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN SINGAPURA

Contempt of Court behavior is rife in the process of resolving court disputes in Indonesia including civil disputes. Contempt of Court actions constitute an insult to the judiciary so that it is appropriate to be sanctioned as a deterrent eff ect. This study aims to determine the actions that can be qualified as a Contempt of Court in the settlement of civil disputes, as well as understanding the law enforcement of the Contempt of Court in the practice of dispute resolution in court and its comparison with Singapore. This study uses normative juridical methods. This method is carried out by examining library materials in the form of legislation, doctrine, and other scientific papers related to the Contempt of Court and interviews with sources to obtain primary data as a secondary data extras, which is then analyzed in a qualitative juridical analysis. The results of the research show that Civil Contempt actions in the practice of civil dispute resolution processes can be interpreted as any act done intentionally not in compliance with every summons, orders, decrees, warnings, or decisions issued by the court resulting in losses to parties who litigate and undermine the authority, dignity and honor of the court. Law enforcement against the actions of Civil Contempt of Court in Indonesia is still considered less eff ective when compared to Singapore. Singapore has included its arrangements in written rules governing the qualifi cations of actions and sanctions imposed. In addition to administrative and civil sanctions, criminal sanctions also apply in order to increase the effectiveness of enforcement of the Civil Contempt of Court.

Finding an Effective Way of Civil Dispute Resolution

The main purpose of this article is to analize the substance of the civil dispute and their effective settlement on the basis of an analysis of modern Ukrainian legal doctrine and legislation, as well as the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and national courts and taking into account modern approaches to dispute resolution in sociology and conflict.

Executorial Strength of Deed of Peace in Civil Dispute Resolution in Indonesia

Civil dispute resolution can be settled through peace institutions with the legal product in form of a deed of peace. However, this institution has not been used by many people even though it provides the civil dispute settlement the executorial strength faster. Thus, it offers no further legal remedies be it in the form of appeals and cassation. Practically, a deed of peace is known to have executorial strength. However, some parties pursue the legal effort despite the peace settlement in the form of the deed of peace. The optimization of the use of the peace institution with executorial strength is expected to solve the problems. This study employed normative legal research with the perspective of legal/ judicial focused on rules/norms of Civil Procedure Law and comparative law through legal principles. It is the study of legal rules which are the benchmarks to behave appropriately. This study was carried out on the norms and principles in the secondary data, which were found in the primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources.

The Public Policy-Implementing Role of Nordic Courts in Civil Dispute Resolution

This chapter explores the role of Nordic courts in safeguarding certain public values and interests, whether substantial or procedural, in the three types of civil dispute resolution that can potentially lead to state enforcement, namely civil litigation, arbitration and mediation. First, it shows how Nordic courts in civil litigation may take on an’active role’ vis-à-vis the parties but that the legal contours of this role remain unclear and controversial. Secondly, it shows how current and proposed statutory frameworks governing arbitration and mediation give national courts an important role in safeguarding public values and interests which raises important questions in law concerning the role of courts as gatekeepers of access to court and state enforcement for private actors. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the need for developing a clearer and more coherent approach to defining this public policy-implementing role of courts across all three types of civil dispute resolution. It is argued that such a coherent approach is needed and that it will be valuable to analyse the public policy-implementing role of courts in a Nordic context, since the Nordic countries generally share many of these relevant public values and interests.