NATURE OF LEGAL RELIEF THROUGH THE LENS OF INTERNATIONAL CIVIL PROCEDURE

The paper argues that legal relief should be treated as a complex notion that has both substantive and procedural dimensions. This argument is illustrated by reference to international disputes as a situation where legal classification has immediate practical consequences. Building on this argument, the paper concludes that courts and tribunals have to apply both substantive and procedural laws when resolving issues pertaining to legal relief. The purpose of each particular legal rule should be decisive to determine its legal nature, while other approaches to legal classification, such as textual interpretation of legal rules, are open to criticism. The paper also reviews a number of practical cases which could be resolved based on the suggested approach to legal classification. In particular, it is argued that the mixed classification of legal relief is helpful to address potential conflicts between remedies available under foreign substantive law and the procedural apparatus of the forum court (lex fori). This approach is also potentially efficient in the context of transnational enforcement of arbitral awards and state court judgments, and in particular it can be used to justify the power of the enforcing court to adapt the relief ordered by the foreign award or judgment to the procedural tradition of lex fori.

TERMINATION OF FINANCIAL LEASE CONTRACT DUE TO DEFECTS OF GOODS: FROM CLAUSULA DE REBUS SIC STANTIBUS TO DOCTRINE OF LINKED CONTRACTS

Translation includes judgements representing solutions adopted in practice of German and Spanish courts as to (typical financial lease contracts) regulation consisting in exemption of lessor from liability to provide compliant goods with the rights under the sales contract assigned to lessee when lessee exercises the right to early terminate the sales contract due to deficiency of goods: what implications for lease contract this triggers? Conscious of contract’s true purpose to finance the purchase, European courts unite in treating financial lease contract as terminated, also being inclined to recognize its retrospective character and, as a result, restitution of all rent payments, including already received by the lessor. However, the courts subject it to different doctrines and differ in legal classification that leads to discrepancies in treatment of particular cases.

Shari‘a a Customary Law?: An Analytical Assessment from The Nigerian Constitution and Judicial Precedents

Under the Nigerian legal classification, shari‘a, the Islamic legal system is classified as customary law. It is on these premises that the Muslims’ agitations for full-fledge shari‘a applications and declassification from being a customary law are always thwarted and termed “unconstitutional” by the shari’a antagonists while the Muslims and protagonists viewed the problems as judicial misinterpretations and legal incongruity. In this study, with the adoption of an analytical approach, shari‘a and customary law are assessed from the provisions of the Nigerian Constitutions and some judicial precedents to unravel the actual position of shari‘a. It was then discovered that, despite the classification under the Nigerian legal system, shari‘a could not have been a customary law due to some factors which include its sources, divinity, permanency and universality.AbstrakDalam hukum Nigeria, hukum Islam atau syariah diklasifikasikan sebagai hukum adat. Premis itulah yang menjadi agitasi upaya penerapan syariah secara penuh oleh umat Islam. Usaha untuk pendeklasifikasi hukum adat selalu digagalkan dan dianggap “inkonstitusional” oleh penentang syariah. sementara sebagian Muslim dan pendukung syariah memandang masalah tersebut sebagai salah tafsir yudisial dan ketidaksesuaian hukum. Dalam penelitian ini, dengan memakai pendekatan analitis, syariah dan hukum adat dinilai untuk mempertegas dalam ketentuan Konstitusi Nigeria berdasar beberapa preseden yudisial untuk mengungkap posisi syariah yang sebenarnya. Kemudian ditemukan bahwa, meskipun klasifikasi di bawah sistem hukum Nigeria, syariah tidak bisa menjadi hukum adat karena beberapa faktor yang meliputi sumbernya, keilahian, keabadian, dan universalitas.

Legal Classification of Defects in Medical Care

The paper studies the legal nature of defects in medical care and defines criteria for their legal classification. A retrospective analysis of the development of the institution of legal responsibility for improper medical treatment is carried out. The concept of a defect in medical care and related categories, their natural ontological characteristics and classifying legal features are investigated, doctrinal approaches to the legal assessment of defects in medical care are considered. It is noted that, despite the noticeable evolution that the question of the responsibility of doctors has undergone in the history of law, there is still no single approach to understanding the legal nature of defects in medical care in jurisprudence. In modern Russian legislation, as in the criminal laws of most foreign countries, there are no special standards for such defects classification. At the same time, in the interests of optimal legal regulation of relations in the field of medicine, today it is the legal definition and systematization of basic concepts and criteria for the legal classification of various medical incidents that matters and not the introduction into the law of special articles establishing criminal liability for improper provision of medical care. Thus, by combining all adverse events in medical practice under the general term "medical incidents", one can use the concept of "medical care defect" to distinguish incidents caused by inappropriate provision of medical services. The author proposes his own classification of defects in medical care dividing them into medical torts (offenses) and medical incidents (accidents and medical errors) based on the nature of the attitude of the subject of medical activity to their professional duties. A conceptual approach to the legal classification of medical care defects has been formulated.

14. Intelligence, mental disorder and crime

This chapter presents the concept of mental disorder, in contrast to the possible physiological influences in criminal behaviour. The idea behind the concept is that the underlying causes are not physical in nature, but are due to the workings of the ‘mind’. The chapter begins with a consideration of whether differences in individuals’ cognitive capacity—or, as it is usually called, intelligence—can have any bearing on the likelihood of their acting in an antisocial manner. It also discusses the definition of ‘learning disability’, a legal classification defined as a state of arrested or incomplete development of the mind, which includes significant impairment of intelligence and social functioning.

Problems of Legal Qualification of the Financial Collateral in Cash

The article analyzes the distinctive features of the financial collateral in cash as a special form of commercial charge. The analysis is relevant for its legal qualification and distinguishment from another form of charge established in the Civil Code – the pledge of monetary funds in the bank account of a pledgor. A proper legal classification of the collateral in cash is important not only for determining the extent of the rights and obligations between the collateral taker and the collateral provider, but also affects the possibility of other financial collateral provider’s creditors to have their claims satisfied in insolvency proceedings. The classification of collateral in cash through the lens of legal consequences, which is used in the legal practice, does not reveal the peculiarities of this type of collateral, therefore the article will examine its other legally significant features. The article also analyses the causes of legal qualification errors and ways to eliminate them.

Opinion-related difficulties related to severe injuries of the facial and cerebral parts of the skull resulting from punching

Aim: Comparison of injuries to the facial and cerebral parts of the skull causing death and grievous bodily harm, resulting solely from punches to the facial area of the skull. Assessment and confrontation of both groups in terms of the final criminal-legal classification of the perpetrator’s acts. Review of reasons for court judgements with a focus on the subjective elements of the prohibited act. Attempt to verify the hypothesis assuming that death or grievous bodily harm can be caused by a single punch to the facial part of the skull. Material and methods: Final judgements passed by criminal divisions of common courts of law in cases where death or grievous bodily harm was caused by injuries to the facial and cerebral parts of the skull resulting solely from punches to the facial area of the skull. Assessment of individual cases within each group to determine similarities and differences. Comparative analysis of both groups. Results: The cause of death in cases involving injuries to the facial part of the skull was rapid suffocation following blood aspiration into the respiratory tract. However, the criminal-legal classification of the perpetrators’ actions in these cases was varied. In one case, death resulted from injuries to the cerebral part of the skull, which are extremely rare as a result of a punch to the facial area within the skull. Grievous bodily harm was due to the loss of vision in the eye, typically due to eyeball rupture. Conclusions: Even though the circumstances of the injuries were similar, different mechanisms were responsible for causing death and grievous bodily harm in the victims. The most severe consequences (death and grievous bodily harm) were not caused by injuries of the same type in any of the cases studied. A single punch to the facial part of the skull may be enough to lead to either grievous bodily harm or death, but the criminal-legal assessment of punching to the face can vary greatly.