volcanic tableland
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Erik Lund Snee ◽  
Elizabeth L. Miller

ABSTRACT The paleogeographic evolution of the western U.S. Great Basin from the Late Cretaceous to the Cenozoic is critical to understanding how the North American Cordillera at this latitude transitioned from Mesozoic shortening to Cenozoic extension. According to a widely applied model, Cenozoic extension was driven by collapse of elevated crust supported by crustal thicknesses that were potentially double the present ~30–35 km. This model is difficult to reconcile with more recent estimates of moderate regional extension (≤50%) and the discovery that most high-angle, Basin and Range faults slipped rapidly ca. 17 Ma, tens of millions of years after crustal thickening occurred. Here, we integrated new and existing geochronology and geologic mapping in the Elko area of northeast Nevada, one of the few places in the Great Basin with substantial exposures of Paleogene strata. We improved the age control for strata that have been targeted for studies of regional paleoelevation and paleoclimate across this critical time span. In addition, a regional compilation of the ages of material within a network of middle Cenozoic paleodrainages that developed across the Great Basin shows that the age of basal paleovalley fill decreases southward roughly synchronous with voluminous ignimbrite flareup volcanism that swept south across the region ca. 45–20 Ma. Integrating these data sets with the regional record of faulting, sedimentation, erosion, and magmatism, we suggest that volcanism was accompanied by an elevation increase that disrupted drainage systems and shifted the continental divide east into central Nevada from its Late Cretaceous location along the Sierra Nevada arc. The north-south Eocene–Oligocene drainage divide defined by mapping of paleovalleys may thus have evolved as a dynamic feature that propagated southward with magmatism. Despite some local faulting, the northern Great Basin became a vast, elevated volcanic tableland that persisted until dissection by Basin and Range faulting that began ca. 21–17 Ma. Based on this more detailed geologic framework, it is unlikely that Basin and Range extension was driven by Cretaceous crustal overthickening; rather, preexisting crustal structure was just one of several factors that that led to Basin and Range faulting after ca. 17 Ma—in addition to thermal weakening of the crust associated with Cenozoic magmatism, thermally supported elevation, and changing boundary conditions. Because these causal factors evolved long after crustal thickening ended, during final removal and fragmentation of the shallowly subducting Farallon slab, they are compatible with normal-thickness (~45–50 km) crust beneath the Great Basin prior to extension and do not require development of a strongly elevated, Altiplano-like region during Mesozoic shortening.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
William T. Jenkins ◽  
Christian Klimczak ◽  
Patrick M. Trent ◽  
Douglas E. Crowe

The Volcanic Tableland, a plateau at the northern end of Owens Valley, CA, is capped by the rhyolitic Bishop Tuff. It hosts many tectonic and volcanic landforms, including hundreds of fault scarps, large joint sets, and inactive fumarolic mounds and ridges. The 1986 Chalfant Valley earthquake sequence shed light on a blind strike-slip fault system beneath the Bishop Tuff. The spatial relationships of the volcanic and tectonic structures have previously been well documented, however, the mechanisms of formation of structures and their enhancement as fumarolic pathways remain largely unexplored. We collected fault kinematic indicators, joint orientations, and documented fumarolic alterations of microcrystalline quartz in the Bishop Tuff and combined those field observations with fault response modeling to assess whether strike-slip activity played a key role in the development of fumarolic pathways. We found field evidence of dip-slip and strike-slip faulting that are consistent with the overall transtensional regional tectonics. Our modeling indicates that a blind strike-slip fault system would dilate joints in the overlying Bishop Tuff with preferred orientations that match observed orientations of joints along which fumarolic activity occurred. Our results imply that the localization of fumaroles was tectonically controlled and that fault activity in the valley floor likely initiated prior to tuff emplacement.


Geosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1206-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin DeLano ◽  
Jeffrey Lee ◽  
Rachelle Roper ◽  
Andrew Calvert

Abstract Strike-slip faults commonly include extensional and contractional bends and stepovers, whereas rotational stepovers are less common. The Volcanic Tableland, Black Mountain, and River Spring areas (California and Nevada, USA) (hereafter referred to as the VBR region) straddle the transition from the dominantly NW-striking dextral faults that define the northwestern part of the eastern California shear zone into a rotational stepover characterized by dominantly NE-striking sinistral faults that define the southwestern Mina deflection. New detailed geologic mapping, structural studies, and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology across the VBR region allow us to calculate Pliocene to Pleistocene fault slip rates and test predictions for the kinematics of fault slip transfer into this rotational stepover. In the VBR, Mesozoic basement is nonconformably overlain by a Miocene sequence of rhyolite, dacite, and andesite volcanic rocks that yield 40Ar/39Ar ages between 22.878 ± 0.051 Ma and 11.399 ± 0.041 Ma. Miocene rocks are unconformably overlain by an extensive sequence of Pliocene basalt and andesite lava flows and cinder cones that yield 40Ar/39Ar ages between 3.606 ± 0.060 Ma and 2.996 ± 0.027 Ma. The Pliocene sequence is, in turn, unconformably overlain by Quaternary tuffs and sedimentary rocks. This sequence of rocks is cut by NS- to NW-striking normal faults across the Volcanic Tableland that transition northward into NS-striking normal faults across the Black Mountain area and that, in turn, transition northward into NW-striking dextral and NE-striking sinistral faults in the River Spring area. A range of geologic markers were used to measure offset across the faults in the VBR, and combined with the age of the markers, yield minimum ∼EW-extension rates of ∼0.5 mm/yr across the Volcanic Tableland and Black Mountain regions, and minimum NW-dextral slip and NE-sinistral slip rates of ∼0.7 and ∼0.3 mm/yr, respectively, across the River Spring region. In the River Spring area, our preferred minimum dextral slip and sinistral slip rates are 0.8–0.9 mm/yr and 0.7–0.9 mm/yr, respectively. We propose three kinematic fault slip models, two irrotational and one rotational, whereby the VBR region transfers a portion of dextral Owens Valley fault slip northwestward into the Mina deflection. In irrotational model 1, Owens Valley fault slip is partitioned into two components, one northeastward onto the White Mountain fault zone and one northwestward into the Volcanic Tableland. Slip from the two zones is then transferred northward into the southwestern Mina deflection. In irrotational model 2, Owens Valley fault slip is partitioned into three components, with the third component partitioned west-northwest onto the Sierra Nevada frontal fault zone. In the rotational model, predicted sinistral slip rates across the southwestern Mina deflection are at least 115% greater than our observed minimum slip rates, implying our minimum observed rates underestimate true sinistral slip rates. A comparison of summed geologic fault slip rates, parallel to motion of the Sierra Nevada block relative to the central Great Basin, from the Sierra Nevada northeastward across the VBR region and into western Nevada are the same as geodetic rates, if our assumptions about the geologic slip rate across the dextral White Mountain fault zone is correct.


Lithosphere ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Ferrill ◽  
Alan P. Morris ◽  
Ronald N. McGinnis ◽  
Kevin J. Smart ◽  
Morgan J Watson-Morris ◽  
...  

Lithosphere ◽  
10.1130/l43.1 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald N. McGinnis ◽  
Alan P. Morris ◽  
David A. Ferrill ◽  
Cynthia L. Dinwiddie

GSA Today ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
David A. Ferrill ◽  
Alan P. Morris ◽  
Nancye H. Dawers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document