Inflammation and Platelet Activation After COVID-19 Vaccines - Possible Mechanisms Behind Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Introduction of vaccines against COVID-19 has provided the most promising chance to control the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic. However, the adenovirus-vector based Oxford/AstraZeneca [ChAdOx1] (AZ) and Johnson & Johnson [Ad26.CoV2.S] COVID-19 vaccines have been linked with serious thromboembolic events combined with thrombocytopenia, denominated Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT). The pathogenesis of COVID-19 VITT remain incompletely understood; especially the initial events that trigger platelet activation, platelet factor (PF)4 release, complex formation and PF4 antibody production are puzzling. This is a prospective study investigating the impact of different COVID-19 vaccines on inflammation (CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), vascular endothelial activation (syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, E-selectin, ICAM-1, ICAM-3, VCAM-1), platelet activation (P-selectin, TGF-β, sCD40L) and aggregation (Multiplate® impedance aggregometry), whole blood coagulation (ROTEM®), thrombin generation and PF4 antibodies to reveal potential differences between AZ and mRNA vaccines in individuals without VITT. The study included 80 (55 AZ and 55 mRNA) vaccinated individuals and 55 non-vaccinated age- and gender matched healthy controls. The main findings where that both vaccines enhanced inflammation and platelet activation, though AZ vaccination induced a more pronounced increase in several inflammatory and platelet activation markers compared to mRNA vaccination and that post-vaccination thrombin generation was higher following AZ vaccination compared to mRNA vaccination. No difference in neither the PF4 antibody level nor the proportion of individuals with positive PF4 antibodies were observed between the vaccine groups. This is the first study to report enhanced inflammation, platelet activation and thrombin generation following AZ vaccination compared to mRNA vaccination in a head-to-head comparison. We speculate that specific components of the AZ adenovirus vector may serve as initial trigger(s) of (hyper)inflammation, platelet activation and thrombin generation, potentially lowering the threshold for a cascade of events that both trigger complications related to excessive inflammation, platelet and coagulation activation as observed in epidemiological studies and promote development of VITT when combined with high-titer functionally active PF4 antibodies.

Screening of Synthetic Heterocyclic Compounds as Antiplatelet Drugs

Background: Antiplatelet drugs represent the keystone in the treatment and prevention of diseases of ischemic origin, including coronary artery disease. The current palette of drugs represents efficient modalities in most cases, but their effect can be limited in certain situations or associated with specific side effects. In this study, representatives of compounds selected from series having scaffolds with known or potential antiplatelet activity were tested. These compounds were previously synthetized by us, but their biological effects have not yet been reported. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the antiplatelet and anticoagulation properties of selected compounds and determine their mechanism of action. Methods: Antiplatelet activity of compounds and their mechanisms of action were evaluated using human blood by impedance aggregometry and various aggregation inducers and inhibitors and compared to appropriate standards. Cytotoxicity was tested using breast adenocarcinoma cell cultures and potential anticoagulation activity was also determined. Results: In total, four of 34 compounds tested were equally or more active than the standard antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). In contrast to ASA, all 4 active compounds decreased platelet aggregation triggered not only by collagen, but also partly by ADP. The major mechanism of action is based on antagonism at thromboxane receptors. In higher concentrations, inhibition of thromboxane synthase was also noted. In contrast to ASA, the tested compounds did not block cyclooxygenase-1. Conclusion: The most active compound, 2-amino-4-(1H-indol-3-yl)-6-nitro-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile (2-N), which is 4-5x times more potent than ASA, is a promising compound for the development of novel antiplatelet drugs.

Whole blood platelet impedance aggregometry with the ROTEM platelet device: comparison of 2 anticoagulants and storage times for the establishment of canine reference intervals

The ROTEM platelet device, a point-of-care whole blood platelet impedance aggregometer, is an add-on to the rotational thromboelastometry ROTEM delta device. The latter has been validated in dogs. We examined whether canine whole blood is suited for analysis with the ROTEM platelet device using adenosine-5′-diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (ARA) as agonists for platelet activation, and if there are significant differences between sample storage times and anticoagulants used. Subsequently, we determined canine reference intervals (RIs) for the ROTEM platelet device for ADP and ARA. In a pilot study, we examined whole blood from 7 dogs after 15-min and 60-min storage of lithium-heparinized samples and 40-min and 80-min storage of hirudinized samples. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between ROTEM platelet device results for both ADP and ARA in lithium-heparin and hirudin anticoagulated canine whole blood. Lithium-heparinized blood samples analyzed after 15-min storage had the lowest coefficient of variation. RIs were determined for heparinized whole blood samples from 49 dogs after 15 min of storage.

Long-term post-discharge coagulation abnormalities in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19

Introduction Coagulopathy plays a significant role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Benefit from anticoagulation is well established in hospitalized patients. But since there is a lack of data on coagulopathy resolution: there is no consensus in guidelines if extended anticoagulation is required. Purpose The purpose of our work was to analyze coagulation abnormalities at 2 to 5 months after moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods COVID-19 reconvalescents (CR), discharged from our hospital, were called for follow-up at 2–3 (CR1 group, 21 patients) or 5–6 (CR2 group, 26 patients) months after discharge. All CR were not on the anticoagulation therapy by that time. In addition to clinical examination and standard lab tests, we performed an FMD-test to analyze endothelial function, impedance aggregometry to analyze platelet aggregation, and a thrombodynamics test to assess thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis. The control group was recruited before the pandemic started. Results All CR were free from thrombotic complications after discharge from the hospital. Endothelial function was not significantly impaired in CR compared with control, and was still in the normal range (7,07, IQR (3,36; 11,56) vs. 7,87 (5,42; 13,45)). Platelet aggregation was significantly lower in CR1 than in the control group in ADP-induced mode (37, IQR (19; 47) vs. 46, IQR (41; 50), p=0,02) and didn't differ in other groups and other modes (Asa, TRAP-induced). Thrombodynamics tests revealed suppression of the clot formation process in both CR1 and CR2 compared with control. There were decreased clot growth rates (μm/min) (CR1/CR2: 27,1, IQR (26,1; 29,2)/27,6, IQR (26,4; 30,0) vs. 32,2, IQR (30,0; 35,1), both p<0,001); decreased clot size (μm) (CR1/CR2: 1099, IQR (1069; 1194)/1199, IQR (1058; 1221) vs. 1304, IQR (1164; 1380), both p<0,001), and decreased optical density (arb units) (CR1/CR2: 21'607, IQR (20'363; 24'545)/22'741, IQR (21'344; 25'961) vs. 26'556, IQR (24'672; 29'387, p<0,001 and p=0,09 respectively. Fibrinolysis was enhanced in CR groups compared with control (lysis progression was significantly higher for CR2 only, CR1/CR2: 2,9, IQR (2,5; 3,8)/3,8, IQR (2,6; 5,4) vs. 2,5, IQR (1,1; 3,4) %/min, p=0,087 and p=0,007 respectively; expected clot lysis time was shorter in both CR1 and CR2: 36,5, IQR (29,8; 44,2)/31,7, IQR (24,3; 42,7) vs. 65,9. IQR (36,3; 95,5) min, p=0,019 and p=0,016 respectively). There was no statistical difference in clot formation and in fibrinolysis between CR1 and CR2. Conclusion In the deferred period (2–5 months) of COVID-19 the fibrinolysis process remains still active whereas the process of clot formation is mostly suppressed. Endothelial function assessed via the FMD test is within the normal range in the post COVID period. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

High Levels IPF as Possible Predictor Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents a serious complication of heparin treatment. IgG antibodies binding Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) and heparin trigger the clinical manifestations of HIT. A 4T score is used to stratify the selection of patients suitable for examination. However, the selection of suitable patients remains at the discretion of the clinician, who is confronted with determining the cause of thrombocytopenia. The inclusion of the evaluation of the Immature platelet fraction result seems to be a suitable complement to the stratification of patients because we do not climb elevated IPF values when consuming platelets due to their immunization. Materials and Methods: In a group of 432 thrombocytopenic samples IPF was detected and analyzed in 45 patients with suspected HIT, a 4T score was determined; IPF and HIT functional tests were examined. IPF was determined by oxazine fluorescent dyeing structures of nucleic acid-containing platelets and fluorescence detection on a Sysmex XN 1000 analyser. To determine HIT, impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate® analyser (MEA) as heparin-induced aggregation techniques. The MEA method uses sensitization of donor platelets with patient plasma in the presence of heparin at a concentration of 0.5IU/mL. Results: From the results of the test, it is evident that 10 patients from our group of 45 examined showed positivity of HIT, which is a significant number due to the proven occurrence of HIT in patients treated with LMWH and showing thrombocytopenia. If we evaluate these 10 patients in terms of IPF value, it is evident that 6 of them have an increased value of IPF >10%, which is a 33% positive predictive value and 4 have IPF >30%, when the positive predictive value is even 100%. Conclusions: Diagnosis of HIT remains a complicated clinical laboratory issue. However, new diagnostic options provide considerable potential for solving this problem. The implementation of IPF assays helps us in the diagnosis of HIT on two levels. On the one hand, it provides us with information on platelet consumption in hospitalized patients and thus draws our attention to HIT as one of the options for congestive thrombocytopenia, unless, of course, disseminated intravascular coagulation or thrombotic microangiopathy. Secondly, its implementation will increase the predictive value of the 4T score in patients at medium risk, which is, however, the vast majority indicated for HIT examination.

Novel Predictors of Future Vascular Events in Post-stroke Patients—A Pilot Study

Introduction: A modified platelet function test (mPFT) was recently found to be superior compared to impedance aggregometry for selection of post-stroke patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). We aimed to explore some peripheral blood cell characteristics as predictors of recurrent ischemic episodes. The predictive value of mPFT was also assessed in a cohort followed up to 36 months regarding recurrent ischemic vascular events.Methods: As a novelty, not only whole blood (WB), but after 1-h gravity sedimentation the separated upper (UB) and lower half blood (LB) samples were analyzed including neutrophil antisedimentation rate (NAR) in 52 post-stroke patients taking clopidogrel. Area under the curve (AUC, AUCupper and AUClower, respectively) was separately measured by Multiplate in the WB, UB and LB samples to characterize ex vivo platelet aggregation in the presence of ADP. Next, the occurrence of vascular events (stroke, acute coronary syndrome, ACS) were evaluated during 36-month follow-up.Results: A total of 11 vascular events (stroke n = 5, ACS n = 6) occurred during the follow-up period. The AUCupper was significantly higher in patients with recurrent stroke compared to those with uneventful follow-up (p = 0.03). The AUCupper with a cut-off value ≥70 based on the mPFT, was able to predict all stroke events (p = 0.01), while the total vascular events were independently predicted by NAR with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 88%.Conclusions: A combination of NAR reflecting the inflammatory state and AUCupper indicating HTPR may provide a better prediction of recurrent ischemic events suggesting a better selection of patients at risk, thus providing an individually tailored vascular therapy.

A Combination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Predict More Favorable Dynamics of Platelet Reactivity versus Clopidogrel Alone in the Acute Phase of Minor Stroke

Background: The combined use of clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for the short-term (21 days) therapy of minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Previous studies have demonstrated its efficacy and superiority over treatment with a single antiplatelet agent. However, there is insufficient support for the advantages of such therapy based on platelet function testing. We aimed to compare the effect of the concomitant use of clopidogrel and aspirin versus clopidogrel alone on the dynamics of platelet reactivity over time to determine the appropriate antiplatelet treatment strategy for minor strokes. Methods: We enrolled 74 ischemic stroke subjects, including 38 minor strokes. Platelet reactivity was assessed by impedance aggregometry (Multiplate Analyzer) 48 and 96 h after a first 75 mg dose of clopidogrel, using the acetylsalicylic acid platelet inhibition (ASPI) test and the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test. Dual antiplatelet therapy was strictly reserved only to minor strokes, as the other strokes received clopidogrel alone in the secondary prevention. The dynamics of platelet reactivity refer to the difference between two assessments, and a decrease in values over time was considered favorable. Results: The incidence of clopidogrel non-responsiveness was 64.8%, and this was similar in the group of minor strokes and the group of more disabling strokes. We indicated diabetes mellitus as an independent predictor of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (Odds ratio OR 5.69 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.13–41.26, p = 0.0386). Among minor strokes treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, in relation to clopidogrel, we reported a trend toward more favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time compared to the group using clopidogrel alone (p = 0.0652 vs. p = 0.3384, respectively). We identified five predictors (sex, female; small-vessel disease; no diabetes; no hyperlipidemia; and no alcohol abuse) related to a significant decrease in platelet reactivity over time with respect to clopidogrel. No significant dynamics of platelet reactivity when using aspirin were found. Conclusions: Our findings, based on the favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time in relation to clopidogrel, confirm the usefulness of dual antiplatelet therapy in minor strokes and support the continuation of the secondary prevention with clopidogrel alone rather than aspirin, particularly among identified beneficiaries of such a strategy.

Influence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Platelet Aggregation in Cirrhosis

Hyper-functional platelets are being proposed as a potential therapeutic target in multiple cancers. Whether this can be considered in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown as their platelet function has not yet been investigated. We evaluated platelet function in cirrhosis patients with HCC. Patients with cirrhosis with and without HCC were prospectively recruited. Platelet aggregation, a marker of platelet function, was assessed by impedance aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (ASPI), and thrombin (TRAP) stimulation. Plasmatic levels of Von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF) were also determined. One-hundred patients were recruited (50 cirrhotics with and 50 without HCC). Cirrhosis severity by Child class and platelet count were comparable between cirrhotics with and without HCC. Cirrhotics with HCC had higher ADP- (45 vs. 28; p < 0.001), ASPI- (47 vs. 28; p < 0.001), and TRAP- (85 vs. 75; p = 0.01) induced platelet aggregation than cirrhotics without HCC, all indicative of platelet hyper-function. The relatively increased platelet aggregation in patients with HCC was confirmed after adjusting the analysis for platelet count/severity of thrombocytopenia. Levels of VWF were higher in patients with vs. without HCC (348 vs. 267; p = 0.006), particularly in compensated cirrhosis. In patients with cirrhosis, HCC is associated with increased platelet aggregation and higher VWF. The clinical implications of these findings deserve further investigation.