transfusion transmitted infection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Antibiotics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Sahra Fonseca ◽  
Marie-Pierre Cayer ◽  
K. M. Tanvir Ahmmed ◽  
Nima Khadem-Mohtaram ◽  
Steve J. Charette ◽  
...  

Technological innovations and quality control processes within blood supply organizations have significantly improved blood safety for both donors and recipients. Nevertheless, the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection remains non-negligible. Applying a nanoparticular, antibacterial coating at the surface of medical devices is a promising strategy to prevent the spread of infections. In this study, we characterized the antibacterial activity of an SiO2 nanoparticular coating (i.e., the “Medical Antibacterial and Antiadhesive Coating” [MAAC]) applied on relevant polymeric materials (PM) used in the biomedical field. Electron microscopy revealed a smoother surface for the MAAC-treated PM compared to the reference, suggesting antiadhesive properties. The antibacterial activity was tested against selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in accordance with ISO 22196. Bacterial growth was significantly reduced for the MAAC-treated PVC, plasticized PVC, polyurethane and silicone (90–99.999%) in which antibacterial activity of ≥1 log reduction was reached for all bacterial strains tested. Cytotoxicity was evaluated following ISO 10993-5 guidelines and L929 cell viability was calculated at ≥90% in the presence of MAAC. This study demonstrates that the MAAC could prevent bacterial contamination as demonstrated by the ISO 22196 tests, while further work needs to be done to improve the coating processability and effectiveness of more complex matrices.


Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh Chidambaram ◽  
Jennifer M. Jones ◽  
Parvez M. Lokhandwala ◽  
Evan M. Bloch ◽  
Sophie Lanzkron ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Nina Khanna ◽  
Maja Weisser ◽  
Anemone Hedstueck ◽  
Sarah Tschudin Sutter ◽  
Sandra Roesch ◽  
...  

Background. COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is a pandemic disease with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, available therapeutic options for COVID-19 are limited. Prior experience in epidemics with convalescent plasma (CP) containing antibodies to viruses has demonstrated variable indications of therapeutic efficacy for: Influenza, Argentine Hemorrhagic Fever, and SARS. Characterizing antibody titers to viruses has indicated correlation with therapeutic efficacy. Convalescent COVID-19 patients with potent SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses can serve as plasma donors for immune therapy. However, antibody responses are variable, many donors are first-time higher risk blood donors, and rapid assays to select optimal CP immune efficacy are limited. Pathogen inactivation (PI) of CP can reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection by unrecognized pathogens. Objectives. This study characterized COVID-19 PI-CP activity; and evaluated efficacy and safety of PI CP transfusion in a case matched controlled cohort of acute COVID-19 patients. Methods. COVID-19 apheresis CP (650 - 1300 mL) was collected from nasopharyngeal PCR + outpatients following 2 PCR negative tests or 28 days after symptom resolution. Amotosalen-UVA PI of CP (INTERCEPT Blood System for Plasma) was performed, and antibody efficacy before and after PI was characterized by: VSV reporter pseudo-virus plaque neutralization (RVPN) NT-50 titer (Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco), antibody to S and N virus proteins by agglutination-dependent antibody PCR (ADAP, Enable Biosciences, San Francisco), virus ACE-2 soluble receptor neutralization assay (Enable Biosciences), and SARS-CoV-2 antibody profile by coronavirus microarray (University of California, Irvine). Patient inclusion criteria were: confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, pulmonary infiltrates, availability of ABO compatible CP, and informed consent. CP patients were matched with control patients (CTRL) for disease severity at diagnosis by standardized clinical risk score (W. Liang et al JAMA Intern Med 2020) and concomitant Tocilizumab use. CP Patients received a total of 400 mL of PI CP from 2 donors over 48 hours and standard therapy. CTRL patients received standard COVID-19 therapy without CP. The primary outcome was in-hospital death to day 28. Secondary outcomes included: progression to intubation, admission to ICU, time to discharge, serious adverse events, NP viral clearance, plasma viral clearance, and humoral immune responses. Differences between CP and CTRL patients were assessed by the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables, and by Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Progression to ICU and intubation were analyzed as odds ratios calculated by conditional logistic regression. Results. 15 CP and 30 CTRL patients were enrolled. One CP patient was admitted in cardiogenic shock. Only 2 of 15 CP cohort patients had detectable IgG antibody to SARS CoV-2 S1 antigen at study entry. 3 of 15 PI CP donors had negligible SARS CoV-2 IgG antibodies to all antigens, and demonstrated poor neutralization efficacy. 12/15 CP had effective RVPN titers (> 1:80), RVPN titers were correlated with ACE-2 neutralization antibody titers (r2 = 0.83), and had significant activity specific for S and RBD antigens by microarray profiling (Figure 1). SARS CoV-2 antibody levels were variable between CP donors, but not impacted by PI (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics of CP and matched CTRL patients were similar (Table 1). Sensitivity analysis was performed assessing mortality after exclusion of one CTRL patient admitted in cardiogenic shock and the 2 respective controls. In-hospital 28-day mortality was lower in the CP cohort (0/14) compared to 5/28 CTRL, p = 0.151, 2-sided Fisher's exact test. Progression to intubation, ICU admission, and days in hospital were not significantly different (Table 1). There was a trend toward decreased inflammatory response (CRP normalization) in CP patients. Conclusions. In hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients was lower in the PI-CP cohort, but not statistically significant. 15% of CP had ineffective antibody by multiple assays. However, PI did not impact CP anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. PI of plasma provides reduced risk of transfusion transmitted infection from COVID-19 CP donors. In this study, PI CP was safe, and may be effective for early treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Disclosures von Goetz: Cerus Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Khan:Nanommune Inc.: Current equity holder in private company. Tsai:Enable Biosciences: Current Employment. Robinson:Enable Biosciences: Current Employment. Seftel:Enable Biosciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Bagri:Cerus Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Corash:Cerus Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. e189-e189
Author(s):  
Marini Ramli ◽  
Zefarina Zulkafli ◽  
Geoffrey Keith Chambers ◽  
Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Zilan ◽  
Hisham Atan Edinur

Objectives: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) markers using standard serological methods and nucleic acid testing (NAT) among blood donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Methods: Donated blood units were assessed for the presence or absence of HBV, HCV, and HIV using two screening method: serology and NAT. Reactive blood samples were then subjected to serological confirmatory and NAT discriminatory assays. Results: A total of 9669 donors were recruited from September 2017 to June 2018. Among these, 36 donors were reactive either for HBV, HCV, or HIV by serological testing and eight by NAT screening. However, only 10 (three for HBV and seven for HCV) donors tested positive using serological testing and five (two for HBV and three for HCV) by NAT discriminatory assays. Note that all five NAT positive donors detected in the NAT discriminatory assays were confirmed to be serologically reactive. Therefore, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV was 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.0%, respectively, in our donor pool. Conclusions: Both serological and NAT screening and confirmatory assays should be used routinely to reduce the risk of infection transmission via the transfusion of blood and blood components.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahsan Ashfaq ◽  
Ayesha Ejaz ◽  
Fareena Khalil Ahmed ◽  
Noor Un Nisa ◽  
Suresh Langhani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 121-127
Author(s):  
Teuku Ilhami Surya Akbar ◽  
Sarah Rahmayani Siregar ◽  
Riska Nadia Amris

Background. Blood transfusion is an important part of modern health services. When used properly, transfusion can save patient's life and improve health. Blood transfusion has risk of transmitted infectious diseases through blood transfusion (TTI) especially HIV / AIDS, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, and Syphilis, and Malaria, Dengue Fever (DHF) can only be done in endemic areas, as well as other transfusions which can be life threatening. Method. This was descriptive study with cross sectional approach and sampling techniques using secondary data with total population method. From the sample of 23,875 samples (12,305 (2017) and 11,573 (2018)), it was seen which results of TTI reactive from donor data to be included in finding research objects. Results. In 2017 HbSAg reactive TTI parameters 1.7%, Anti HCV 0.5%, HIV Ag / Ab 0.7%, and Treponema 4% and TTI reactive results in donors in 2018 HbSAg parameters 1.3%, Anti HCV 0.3%, HIV Ag / Ab 0.25% and Treponema 2.2%. Comparison of donor TTI screening results in Blood Center of North Aceh-Indonesia in the period 2017-2018 changes in the ratio of TTI reactive numbers in the HbSAg parameter of 0.4%, Anti HCV 0.2%, HIV Ag / Ab 0.45% and Treponema 1.8% in period 2018. Conclusion: Although the reactive rate in 2017 is relatively high, in 2018 the reactive TTI level shows a decline. This condition can be caused by two factors. ; (1) Implementation of donor selection was good with good data collection and documentation system. (2) The inspection method carried out affects the results of the existing inspection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
Md Abdul Quader ◽  
Khan Anisul Islam ◽  
Tashmim Farhana Dipta ◽  
Md Ashadul Islam

Background: Patients with chronic renal failure on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) have high risks of viral infections and the prevalence of transfusion transmissible viral infection is common among them. The aim of our study was to detect hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients and healthy donors and to explore if there was a relationship between duration of hemodialysis and hepatitis B and hepatitis C in our patients. Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted in a private hemodialysis clinic in Dhaka city with end stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis and an age matched healthy donors as comparable group from July 2015 to June 2016. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), HBsAg and anti HCV were determined along with duration and units of blood transfusion needed by them. Results: Our study showed the mean age of 126 MHD patients were 42.2±11.7 years along with 132 healthy donors as control group had mean age 39.2±9.7 years. Among the hemodialysis patients 34 (26.98%) showed transfusion transmitted infection positivity and in control group 11 (8.33%) showed transfusion transmitted infection positivity with the difference between two study group showed statistical significance (p<o.oo1). History of blood transfusion showed the significant predictor of occurrence of TTV infection in hemodialysis patients (p<0.01). Duration of hemodialysis and seropositivity of TTI was not significant (p>0.05). The number of units of blood transfusion and the TTI positivity also showed no significant difference (p>0.05) with HBsAg (17.46%) and anti HCV (9.52%). Conclusions: The prevalence of TTI in hemodialysis patients is significantly higher than that in healthy individuals. So, the regular screening of HBV and HCV among patients and healthy donors are strictly provided to monitor the communicable disease. Bangladesh J Medicine July 2019; 30(2) : 78-82


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document