selenium removal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

84
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 127603
Author(s):  
Khaled Zoroufchi Benis ◽  
Kerry N. McPhedran ◽  
Jafar Soltan

2020 ◽  
Vol 742 ◽  
pp. 140661
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
Jung-Chen Huang ◽  
Chuanqi Zhou ◽  
Shengbing He ◽  
Weili Zhou
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Kalaitzidou ◽  
Andreas‐Arsenios Nikoletopoulos ◽  
Loukas Bakouros ◽  
Anastasios Zouboulis ◽  
Manassis Mitrakas

The present study aims at comparing the two most promising water treatment technologies for selenium removal. A techno‐economical comparison of Se(IV) uptake between the laboratory synthesized iron oxy hydroxide (FeOOH/2.5) with the highest positive surface density of 3.25 mmol [OH−]/g and adsorption capacity 4.3 μg Se(IV)/mg FeOOH/2.5 at pH 7, and coagulation/precipitation with the use of Fe(III) presenting an uptake capacity 3.2 μg Se(IV)/mg Fe was attempted based on the laboratory scale results. The evaluation showed that coagulation/precipitation treatment appears to be economically advantageous in comparison to adsorption process that was applied in Rapid Small Scale Column Tests (RSSCTs) with the FeOOH/2.5. It must be pointed out that for selection of the optimum removal method, other criteria should also be considered, such as post treatment requirements, water flow, labor cost, and maintenance requirements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document