pendulum appliance
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

65
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Abhishek Jain ◽  
Garima Jain ◽  
Madhuli Bhide ◽  
Pratibha Sharma ◽  
Janhavi Sapre ◽  
...  

A 12 years 6 months old Indian male presented with a chief complaint of irregular upper and lower front teeth. Patient exhibited a mild convex profile on Class l skeletal base with slightly decreased vertical proportions. This was complicated by severe upper and lower labial segment crowding. Also the molar relationship was half unit class ll bilaterally. Since the patient did not want to go for extraction of premolars, treatment involved use of Pendulum appliance along with upper and lower pre-adjusted edgewise appliance (0.022x0.028” slot) with MBT prescription. Various elastics and overlay wires were used along with proximal stripping for the correction of severe crowding in upper and lower anterior teeth.: Clinically Angle’s Class I occlusion was achieved bilaterally with good intercuspal relationship. Vertical growth continued throughout the treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Nivedita Nandeshwar ◽  
Sujoy Banerjee ◽  
Rashmi Jawalekar ◽  
Usha Shenoy

24 year male patient presented with skeletal class II base with prognathic maxilla and orthognathic mandible. Angles class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion with proclined upper and lower anteriors, increase overjet, increased overbite, spacing with upper and lower anteriors, scissor bite with 35, class I molar and canine relation on right side, end on molar and canine relation on left side. Distalization was planned in maxillary arch to correct end on molar relation on left side and upper incisor proclination. Unilateral Pendulum appliance was used to distalize upper left molar. Post treatment Class I molar relationship was achieved bilaterally within 2-4 months with incisor proclination reduced. The total treatment ended in 18 months.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-504
Author(s):  
Himawan Halim

Background: The process of distalization in orthodontic treatment is often very difficult. The most common method is the use of cervical headgear. However, due to poor patient compliance, it leads to poor treatment outcomes. Treatment alternatives that require minimal compliance include Jones jig, magnets, and pendulum. Objective: This study aimed to perform distalization of a maxillary molars on a bilateral Class II molar relationship patient with a crowded maxillary arch. Case Report: A 10-year-old female with a Class II molar relationship, bilateral posterior crossbite, and nonerupted upper canines was treated with a rapid palatal expander (RPE), pendulum appliance, and fixed appliance. The crowding in the maxillary arch and spacing in the mandibular arch were eliminated, and transverse discrepancies were corrected. Conclusion: Pendulum appliance is very effective in creating spaces for the eruption of canines and ectopic premolars. Pendulum appliances have been introduced for a long time and have proven successful for molar distalization and space regainer and require minimal patient cooperation. Like other distalization appliances, distal tipping of the molars and mesial movement of the premolars could be observed.


Author(s):  
Manish Goyal ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Kalpit Shaha ◽  
Madhur Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  

2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422110054
Author(s):  
Shweta Nagesh ◽  
M Aravind ◽  
Amit Rekhawat

This article describes the use of a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) 3D metal printed adjunctive orthodontic appliance that can be used with palatal miniscrews for molar distalization. CAD/CAM technology was used to fabricate a customized framework for bone-anchored pendulum appliance effectively based on the patient’s palatal contour, location, and the number of implants to be placed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422097668
Author(s):  
Vasu Murthy Sesham ◽  
Naveen Garipelli ◽  
Praveen Kumar Neela ◽  
Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli

Introduction: Correction of Class II has become a routine with the introduction of mini-implants. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency of bone-anchored intraoral bodily molar distalizer (BAIBMD) as compared to bone-anchored pendulum appliance (BAPA). Materials and Methods: This split-mouth study included 11 subjects (6 boys and 5 girls) who required molar distalization. BAPA constructed on one side and BAIBMD on the other side. Both the appliances were anchored to the bone, using a single 2 × 8 mm titanium mini-screw placed in the anterior para-median region of the mid-palatal suture with its head embedded into the Nance button during construction. The force delivery mechanism on both the sides consisted of 200 g-force application, using an activated 0.032˝ titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA)[A]:Author: Please provide expansion for “TMA.” springs fabricated with respective designs and inserted into the lingual sheaths of the first molar bands. The rate, duration, and nature of tooth movement for both the sides were compared. Descriptive statistics for various parameters were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Clinically successful distalization was achieved on both sides. No statistical difference was found in the rate of distalization. Differences in the treatment duration between the two groups were statistically significant, with less duration taken for distalization with BAPA. Statistically significant molar tipping was observed in BAPA. Conclusion: While both the appliances provided a similar rate of distalization, BAIBMD took more duration than BAPA but produced a predominantly translatory type of distal tooth movement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Eduardo Alessio Junior ◽  
Renato Rodrigues de Almeida ◽  
José Gregório Pelayo Guerra ◽  
Olga Benário Vieira Maranhão ◽  
Guilherme Janson

Author(s):  
Lorenz Moser ◽  
Enrica Di Lorenzo ◽  
Marco Serafin ◽  
Giuliano Maino ◽  
Ute Schneider-Moser ◽  
...  

Introduction: Problem solving in Class II malocclusion treatment performed with premolars extractions or distalizing techniques in relation to the profile modification. Aim: To cephalometrically compare soft tissue changes produced either by maxillary premolar extraction, tooth-borne Pendulum appliance or bone-borne MGBM appliance. Materials and Methods: Both pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) lateral cephalograms of 89 skeletal Class II patients (36 M, 53 F), treated during pubertal growth spurt, were retrospectively selected. Three groups were formed based on the therapy performed: 30 patients had been treated with maxillary first premolars extraction (U4), 31 patients with a conventional tooth-borne distalizing with Pendulum appliance (PA), and 28 patients with a skeletally anchored distalizing appliance (MGBM). Soft tissue was analyzed comparing upper (UL) and lower (LL) lip’s points with regard to True Vertical Line (TVL) and Esthetic plane (E-plane). Skeletal and dental values have been recorded in order to cephalometrically compare ΔT2-T1 changes among groups and to correlate dental and skeletal changes to profile modifications. One-way ANOVA was employed to compare groups at T1. Paired sample t-tests were employed to assess significant intra- and intergroup differences between T2 and T1. Significance level was set at 0.05 Results: UL and LL showed a slight but not significant retrusion relative to TVL in all three groups. UL and LL distances to E-plane were not statistically significant among U4, PA, and MGBM groups. Independently of the treatment, UL was tangent to TVL in all groups. No statistically significant differences have been shown in skeletal records. Significant differences were recorded in Overjet among U4 than PA and MGBM groups. Conclusions: Class II malocclusion treatment with maxillary first premolar extraction, conventional or skeletal distalization did not significantly affect the profile producing similar changes in the soft tissue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document