destructive leadership
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

145
(FIVE YEARS 72)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Zappalà ◽  
Maha Yomn Sbaa ◽  
Elena V. Kamneva ◽  
Leonid A. Zhigun ◽  
Zhanna V. Korobanova ◽  
...  

This study provides a scoping review of the recent conceptual developments about the deviant work behavior and counterproductive work behavior constructs. It also examines the specific types of deviant work behavior that have been more consistently investigated in the last decade, and whether they cover the interpersonal or organizational type of deviant behavior. In addition, individual, group, and organizational predictors of deviant work behaviors are examined. A scoping review of reviews was conducted on Scopus and Web of Science databases and 54 studies published from 2010 to June 2021 were taken into account. Results show that more recent conceptualizations are based on well established models in the literature and consider the hierarchical structure of these two constructs. Recent reviews examine the relationships of deviant work behavior with job performance and ethical behavior constructs, the multilevel nature of deviant work behavior, and the consequences for the actor of the deviance. The specific types of deviant work behavior more frequently reviewed in the last decade are workplace abuse, incivility, ostracism, bullying and sexual harassment, and abusive and destructive leadership; this evidence suggests a much greater attention to interpersonal, rather than organizational, forms of deviant work behavior. Regarding antecedents, results show the continuing prevalence of personality factors antecedents. Limitations of the study and theoretical and practical implications for the field are also provided.


Author(s):  
Sara Grummert ◽  
Raquel Rall

The authors aim to further theoretical conceptualizations of sexual abuse in college sport by providing a wider framework to better identify and combat abuse within organizations. Building on the Toxic Triangle of Destructive Leadership, the authors offer an analysis of destructive leadership from an organizational perspective that reconceptualizes destructive leadership as a group and organizational phenomena by centering governing board actions in previous cases of abuse. Through analysis of the NCAA governance structure and the governance structure of higher education at large, the authors provide rationale for advancing governing boards as a sport governing body and demonstrate how governing boards are inseparable from the governance structure of the NCAA. In analyzing the literature on organizational responses to sexual abuse in intercollegiate athletics, the authors posit a new framework to better identify, prevent, and combat abuse in sport and call for enhanced proactivity from institutional leadership to address sexual abuse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kayani ◽  
Imran Ibrahim Alasan ◽  
Waqas Ali ◽  
Shoib Hassan

Still, there is a lack of research on the dark side or destructive leadership. The purpose of this research is to add the literature on the two shades of destructive leadership, that are aversive and exploitative leadership, and their shadow in the form of counterproductive work behavior on the nursing professionals. Using 485 samples collected from the nurses of different hospitals of Pakistan, the model is tested through multiple linear hierarchical regressions, correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis in Smart PLS software. The results reveal that people working under aversive and exploitative leaders are more likely to indulge in counterproductive work behavior. Still, proactive personalities have an essential impact which weakens the relationship between destructive leadership and counterproductive work behavior. Results of this study describe a vital requirement for corporate leaders to strengthen their recruitment process in such a way that people with aversive and exploitative attitudes ought to understand how to treat their subordinates before they enter top roles to discourage their workers from indulging in counterproductive behavior.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-206
Author(s):  
Murat Aydinay ◽  
Aysehan Cakici ◽  
A. Celil Cakici

The aim of this study was to find out the effect of destructive leadership on employees’ self-efficacy and counterproductive work behaviors. The data was collected from a convenience sample of 486 service sector employees in Mersin, Turkey. Descriptive statistics, explanatory factor analysis, and regression analysis were conducted to analyze the data. The results showed that lack of competence in leadership, excessive authoritarianism, and favoritism dimensions increased the organization-oriented counterproductive work behaviors while resistance to technology and change dimension decreased these behaviors. In contrast, insensitivity to subordinates had no effect on counterproductive work behaviors. Furthermore, destructive leadership had no effect on employees’ self-efficacy, but self-efficacy affected counterproductive work behaviors. This study provides theoretical and practical implications for understanding the effect of destructive leadership behaviors on the employees’ self-efficacy and counterproductive work behaviors in the context of the service sector.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-268
Author(s):  
Muhammad Bilal Kayani ◽  
Imran Ibrahim Alasan ◽  
Rashid Mehmood ◽  
Sumaira Mukhtar Butt ◽  
Muhammad Aksar

Destructive leadership research is neither much studied by the researchers, nor their styles are studied together in the previous literature. This paper adds aversive and autocratic leadership (two shades of destructive leadership) to the investigation, particularly the Pakistani context, which has not been studied before. This paper further proposes that psychological contract breach (PCB) results from the aversive and autocratic leadership due to their destructiveness. The model also gets its support from the COR theory by [47]. People with proactive personalities were hypothesized to moderate the two relations. However, the results supported only two hypotheses. However, the moderation effect was found to be insignificant. It is a cross-sectional study. The data for the current study were collected from 386 nurses working in the public sector hospitals by questionnaires. Quota and convenient sampling techniques were used for the person. In addition to limitations and suggestions for future researchers, the theoretical and practical implications are also provided conclusively. Limitations to the study and suggestions for future examination alongside theoretical and practical implications are also stated.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agrata Pandey ◽  
Ranjeet Nambudiri ◽  
Patturaja Selvaraj ◽  
Ashish Sadh

Purpose The literature on destructive leadership has largely ignored the perspective of the subordinate, especially in terms of conflict coping mechanisms. This study aims to integrate research on destructive leadership and subordinates’ voice behaviour as a conflict coping mechanism. Drawing on the social exchange, conservation of resources and social identity theories, it argues that destructive leadership negatively affects employees’ voice behaviour and that this relationship is moderated by subordinate personality and organization climate. Design/methodology/approach The proposed model was tested on a sample of 275 professionals working in the banking and insurance sector in India using a temporal research design with data collected in two phases six months apart. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was used for data analysis. Findings The results support the main effect relationship between destructive leadership and subordinates’ voice behaviour and the moderation of subordinates’ personality and organizational climate. Temporal analysis indicates that the nature of some relationships changed across the two time periods. Practical implications A greater understanding of destructive leader behaviour and resultant coping strategies of subordinates is likely to provide insights for managers facing such situations. The findings of this study will inform the creation of redressal and voice mechanisms in organizations. Originality/value This is among the first studies to examine the impact of negative forms of leadership on subordinates’ conflict coping mechanisms using a temporal lag design across two time periods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Lundmark ◽  
Andreas Stenling ◽  
Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz ◽  
Susanne Tafvelin

There is a growing awareness that destructive leadership has a significant negative impact on employe outcomes. However, little is known about the content and dimensionality of this multidimensional concept, and there are few reliable measures available for organizations and researchers to evaluate these behaviors. Based on a representative sample (N = 1132) of the Swedish workforce, the aim of this study is threefold: first, to examine the factor structure and validity of an easy-to-use multidimensional destructive leadership measure (Destrudo-L)in the general Swedish work context; second, to identify destructive leadership profiles using latent profile analysis (LPA), and determine in what way they are related to employe outcomes; third, to examine the prevalence of destructive leadership using population weights to estimate responses of a population total in the Swedish workforce (N = 3100282). Our analysis supported the structural validity of Destrudo-L, reflecting both a global factor and specific subdimensions. We identified seven unique destructive leadership profiles along a passive and active continuum of destructive leadership behaviors, with the active showing a less favorable relation to employe outcomes. Finally, we found that a substantial proportion of the Swedish workforce report being exposed to destructive leadership (36.4–43.5%, depending on method used). Active destructive leadership was more common in the public sector and passive destructive leadership in the private. Given the potentially severe effects and the commonness of these behaviors, we argue that organizations should work actively with strategies to identify and intervene, to prevent and to handle the manifestation of these harmful behaviors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 15865
Author(s):  
Daniel Nelson Jones ◽  
Peter Hom

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 12614
Author(s):  
Joshua C. Palmer ◽  
Katherine Crawford Alexander ◽  
Jeremy Mackey ◽  
B. Parker Ellen ◽  
Charn Patrick McAllister ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document