Charge – fixed and floating: Agnew and Another v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council (New Zealand), 5 June 2001 (the “Brumark” case) Charge and Hypothec as Functional Equivalents

Our endeavour is dedicated to a few security devices. The first part of the current work is called “Words of Introduction”. The second portion takes into account a Privy Council case: Agnew and Another v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council (New Zealand), 5 June 2001 (the Brumark case). The third part briefly focuses on charge and mortgage. The fourth portion, in a succinct manner, describes the hypothec. The fifth and final part shows that charge and hypothec are functional equivalents.

Effect of Tax Audit and Tax Amnesty on Tax Yield in Southwest, Nigeria

The study aimed at investigating the effect of tax audit and tax amnesty on tax yield in southwest Nigeria. Tax audit and tax amnesty are part of the tax administration programmes which serves as government’s instrument for determining and monitoring tax collection. Residents have a natural urge to reduce their tax obligations by intentionally overstating their expenses and producing fraudulent entries and falsehoods in their accounting records. Without a doubt, this shows a lot about Nigeria’s tax administration. The study was carried out in southwest Nigeria which comprises of Ekiti, Ondo, Osun, Oyo, Ogun and Lagos States. Survey research method was used for the study and 302 staff of the audit and risk departments from the State Board of Internal Revenue (SBIR) and Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) formed the population of the study. Taro Yamane sampling technique was adopted to get the sampling size of 172 respondents. The researcher created a closed-ended questionnaire called Tax Administration and Tax Yield (TATY) to gather relevant data for the study. The study found that tax audit has significantly positive link with tax yield while tax amnesty has a negative and substantial correlational influence on tax yield significant relationship with tax yield. It was recommended that tax audits should be undertaken on a regular basis and tax amnesty should be fairly play down because it may reduce future tax revenue.

The history and development of the choice principle

<p>“The History and Development of the Choice Principle” is split into different categories of Australian and New Zealand cases in relation to the choice principle: dividend stripping, tax loss grouping provisions, inflated deductions, and income splitting. It considers the official position of the Inland Revenue Department on the choice principle, and sets out arguments for and against the advantages of adopting the principle in New Zealand.</p>

The history and development of the choice principle

<p>“The History and Development of the Choice Principle” is split into different categories of Australian and New Zealand cases in relation to the choice principle: dividend stripping, tax loss grouping provisions, inflated deductions, and income splitting. It considers the official position of the Inland Revenue Department on the choice principle, and sets out arguments for and against the advantages of adopting the principle in New Zealand.</p>

The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand

<p>This paper considers whether the fiscal nullity doctrine is part of New Zealand law with particular reference to Ben Nevis Forestry Ventures Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and some discussion of cases relating to fiscal nullity from the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada</p>

Tax avoidance in New Zealand: in search of principles

<p>This paper analyses the judicial application of New Zealand’s general anti-tax avoidance rule contained in s BG 1 of the Income Tax Act 2007 in the light of three 20th Century jurisprudential theories of legal reasoning. It focuses specifically on the role of moral principles in the process of judicial decision-making and explores whether existing case law on the avoidance provision can be seen as supporting the hypothesis that judges apply moral principles when reaching decisions. Following the test laid down for tax avoidance in the Supreme Court’s decision in Ben Nevis Ventures Ltd & Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue, the paper concludes that judges have the ability, in some cases, to reach their decision about whether there has been tax avoidance by applying the moral principle that tax should apply uniformly to all cases that are economically similar.</p>

Tax avoidance in New Zealand: in search of principles

<p>This paper analyses the judicial application of New Zealand’s general anti-tax avoidance rule contained in s BG 1 of the Income Tax Act 2007 in the light of three 20th Century jurisprudential theories of legal reasoning. It focuses specifically on the role of moral principles in the process of judicial decision-making and explores whether existing case law on the avoidance provision can be seen as supporting the hypothesis that judges apply moral principles when reaching decisions. Following the test laid down for tax avoidance in the Supreme Court’s decision in Ben Nevis Ventures Ltd & Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue, the paper concludes that judges have the ability, in some cases, to reach their decision about whether there has been tax avoidance by applying the moral principle that tax should apply uniformly to all cases that are economically similar.</p>

The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand

<p>This paper considers whether the fiscal nullity doctrine is part of New Zealand law with particular reference to Ben Nevis Forestry Ventures Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and some discussion of cases relating to fiscal nullity from the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada</p>

R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte National Federation of the Self Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617, House of Lords (also known as Fleet Street Casuals)

Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte National Federation of the Self Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617, House of Lords (also known as the Fleet Street Casuals case). This case concerns when and how an assessment of an applicant’s standing (or interest, locus standi) should be made for the purposes of determining whether they may bring a judicial review. Lord Diplock’s judgment provided a liberal approach to the assessment of standing as compared with the approaches offered by his fellow judges. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.

Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291, House of Lords

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.