active confinement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Mari Carmen García-Domene ◽  
Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada ◽  
María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo ◽  
María José Luque ◽  
Susana Ortí-Navarro
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Aliakbar Gholampour ◽  
Togay Ozbakkaloglu ◽  
Osman Gencel ◽  
Tuan D. Ngo
Keyword(s):  

Langmuir ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 4224-4230
Author(s):  
Tian-Chen Huang ◽  
Xing-Ping Zhou ◽  
Chun-Lai Ren ◽  
Peng Zhan ◽  
Yu-Qiang Ma

2019 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 116722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliakbar Gholampour ◽  
Togay Ozbakkaloglu ◽  
Ching-Tai Ng
Keyword(s):  

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Ferretti ◽  
Giovanni Pascale

The purpose of this study is to improve the performance of walls under out-of-plane loads especially when subjected to the hammering action of the floors. The idea behind the paper is to provide the masonry walls with a device that behaves like a buttress, without having to build a traditional buttress. The solution presented in this paper consists of a mechanical coupling between the three-dimensional net of steel ribbons of the CAM (Active Confinement of Masonry) system and the CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer) strips. Since the steel ribbons of the CAM system have a pre-tension, the mechanical coupling allows the steel ribbons to establish a semi-rigid transverse link between the CFRP strips bonded on the two opposite sides of a wall. Therefore, two vertical CFRP strips tied by the steel ribbons behave like the flanges of an I-beam and the flexural strength of the ideal I-beam counteracts the out-of-plane displacements of the wall. The experimental results showed that the combined technique inherits the strong points of both constituent techniques. In fact, the delamination load is comparable to that of the specimens reinforced with the CFRP strips and the overall behavior is as ductile as for the specimens reinforced with the CAM system. They also inspired a more performing combined technique.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Ferretti ◽  
Giovanni Pascale

The present paper deals with the retrofitting of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, subjected to in-plane shear and out of-plane loading when struck by an earthquake. After an introductive comparison between some of the latest punctual and continuous active retrofitting methods, the authors focused on the two most effective active continuous techniques, the CAM (Active Confinement of Masonry) system and the Φ system, which also improve the box-type behavior of buildings. These two retrofitting systems allow increasing both the static and dynamic load-bearing capacity of masonry buildings. Nevertheless, information on how they actually modify the stress field in static conditions is lacking and sometimes questionable in the literature. Therefore, the authors performed a static analysis in the plane of Mohr/Coulomb, with the dual intent to clarify which of the two is preferable under static conditions and whether the models currently used to design the retrofitting systems are fully adequate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document