bone plug
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

99
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouya Dehestani ◽  
Farzam Farahmand ◽  
Amirhossein Borjali ◽  
Kaveh Bashti ◽  
Mahmoud Chizari

Abstract Purpose Core Bone Plug Fixation (CBPF) technique is an implant-less methodology for ACL reconstruction. This study investigates the effect of bone density on CBPF stability to identify the bone quality that is likely to benefit from this technique. Methods Artificial blocks with 160 (Group 1), 240 (Group 2), and 320 (Group 3) kg/m3 densities were used to simulate human bone with diverse qualities. These groups are representative of the elderly, middle age and young people, respectively. A tunnel was made in each test sample using a cannulated drill bit which enabled harvesting the core bone plug intact. Fresh animal tendon grafts were prepared and passed through the tunnel, so the core bone was pushed in to secure the tendon. The fixation stability was tested by applying a cyclic load following by a pullout load until the failure occurred. The selected group was compared with interference screw fixation technique as a gold standard method in ACL reconstruction. Results The Group 2 stiffness and yield strength were significantly larger than Group 1. The graft slippage of Group 1 was significantly less than Group 3. The ultimate strengths were 310 N and 363 N, in Groups 2 and 3, significantly larger than that of Group 1. The ultimate strength in fixation by interference screw was 693.18 N, significantly larger than the bone plug method. Conclusions The stability of CBPF was greatly affected by bone density. This technique is more suitable for young and middle-aged people. With further improvements, the CBPF might be an alternative ACL reconstruction technique for patients with good bone quality. Clinical relevance The CBPF technique offers an implant-less organic ACL reconstruction technique with numerous advantages and likely would speed up the healing process by using the patient’s own bones and tissues rather than any non-biologic fixations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 263502542110326
Author(s):  
Navya Dandu ◽  
Nicholas A. Trasolini ◽  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Tai Holland ◽  
Adam B. Yanke

Background: Surgical repair of chronic quadriceps tendon ruptures can be daunting, especially after failure of a prior repair. In this setting, tissue quality is usually poor, necessitating graft augmentation. In this video, we describe our technique for Achilles tendon allograft augmentation for revision quadriceps tendon repair. Indications: Failed quadriceps tendon repair defined as ongoing extensor mechanism deficit including patella baja, functional deficit, or palpable quadriceps defect with confirmed retear on advanced imaging. Technique Description: Patient is placed in the supine position, and a midline incision is extended to the tibial tubercle. Full thickness medial and lateral flaps are raised, nonviable scar tissue is excised, and suprapatellar adhesions are released to ensure full mobilization of the viable remnant quadriceps. A plane is then developed deep to the patellar tendon paratenon from proximal to distal. A reamer is used to prepare a socket just medial to the tibial tubercle. The calcaneal bone block of the Achilles allograft is fashioned to match the recipient site on the tibia with a sagittal saw. The graft is shuttled deep to the paratenon, and the bone plug is fixed to the tibia with an interference screw. Suture from the patellar anchors is then used to place 2 running Krackow stitches spanning the remnant quadriceps tendon proximally. The remnant tissue is subsequently reduced and tied with an anchor pull-through technique. The soft tissue component of the Achilles graft is laid over the repair and oversewn with free nonabsorbable suture. Patient is placed in a brace locked in extension for 6 weeks and allowed to be weight bearing as tolerated. Results: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of Achilles allograft reconstruction for revision extensor mechanism repairs are limited. Two studies of 17 reconstructions each reported this to be a reliable and durable option at a mean follow-up of 65 and 52 months, respectively. Discussion/Conclusion: Revision surgery for extensor mechanism deficits can be a challenging procedure. Our preference is to perform augmentation with Achilles allograft with bone plug fixation on the tibial side. This allows for augmentation of the entire extensor mechanism, as well as bone-to-bone healing on the tibial side.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110420
Author(s):  
Zachariah Gene Wing Ow ◽  
Chin Kai Cheong ◽  
Hao Han Hai ◽  
Cheng Han Ng ◽  
Dean Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is an important treatment option for young patients with deficient menisci; however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal method of allograft fixation. Hypothesis: The various methods of MAT fixation have measurable and significant differences in outcomes. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A single-arm meta-analysis of studies reporting graft failure, reoperations, and other clinical outcomes after MAT was performed. Studies were stratified by suture-only, bone plug, and bone bridge fixation methods. Proportionate rates of failure and reoperation for each fixation technique were pooled with a mixed-effects model, after which reconstruction of relative risks with confidence intervals was performed using the Katz logarithmic method. Results: A total of 2604 patients underwent MAT. Weighted mean follow-up was 4.3 years (95% CI, 3.2-5.6 years). During this follow-up period, graft failure rates were 6.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-11.6%) for bone plug fixation, 6.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-10.3%) for suture-only fixation, and 9.3% (95% CI, 6.2%-13.9%) for bone bridge fixation. Transplanted menisci secured using bone plugs displayed a lower risk of failure compared with menisci secured via bone bridges (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .02). Risks of failure were not significantly different when comparing suture fixation to bone bridge (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; P = .12) and bone plugs (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.02; P = .64). Allografts secured using bone plugs were at a lower risk of requiring reoperations compared with those secured using sutures (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.95; P < .001), whereas allografts secured using bone bridges had a higher risk of reoperation when compared with those secured using either sutures (RR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.38; P < .001) or bone plugs (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.51; P < .001). Improvements in Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were comparable among the different groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that bone plug fixation of transplanted meniscal allografts carries a lower risk of failure than the bone bridge method and has a lower risk of requiring subsequent operations than both suture-only and bone bridge methods of fixation. This suggests that the technique used in the fixation of a transplanted meniscal allograft is an important factor in the clinical outcomes of patients receiving MATs.


Author(s):  
Chilan B.G. Leite ◽  
João M.N. Montechi ◽  
Gilberto L. Camanho ◽  
Riccardo G. Gobbi ◽  
Fabio J. Angelini

AbstractPostoperative infections after allograft implantation is a major concern in knee ligament reconstructions considering the theoretical risk of disease transmission and its potential severity. Here, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative infection rate after knee ligament reconstructions using aseptically processed allografts, and provide an overview of the allografts use in an academic tertiary hospital. A retrospective study was performed evaluating patients who underwent knee ligament reconstructions using aseptically processed allografts, including primary and revision surgeries, from 2005 to 2018. Demographic data, including the type of knee injury and trauma energy, and postoperative data were collected focusing on postoperative infections. Regarding these infected cases, further analyses were performed considering the presenting signs and symptoms, the isolated microorganism identified in culture, the time between graft implantation and diagnosis of infection (defined as acute, subacute, and late), and the need for graft removal. A total of 180 cases of ligament reconstructions were included. The mean follow-up was 8.2 (range: 2.1–15.6) years and the mean age at surgery was 34.1 (± 11.1) years. A total of 262 allografts were implanted in those 180 cases, 93 (35.5%) as bone plug allografts and 169 (64.5%) as soft tissue allografts. Common surgical indications included multiligament reconstruction (57.2%) and primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (15%). Seven cases (3.9%) presented postoperative infections. Knee pain (100%) and swelling (100%) were the most prevalent symptoms. Two cases (28.6%) presented sinus tract. Allografts were removed in two cases, the same cases that presented draining sinus (p = 0.04). High-energy trauma was the only statistically associated factor for infection (p = 0.04). No significant association between infection and the type of allograft (p > 0.99) or sex (p = 0.35) were observed. Four cases (57.1%) had monomicrobial staphylococcal infections. Based on that, the allograft-related infection rate was 1.7% (the remaining three infected cases). Nonirradiated, aseptically processed allografts have a low postoperative infection rate in knee ligament reconstructions, being a safe alternative for surgeries that require additional source, increased variety, and quantity of grafts.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110302
Author(s):  
Wenli Dai ◽  
Xi Leng ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Jin Cheng ◽  
Xiaoqing Hu ◽  
...  

Background: The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable. Hypothesis: Compared with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies. Results: A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure ( P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score ( P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability ( P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure ( P = .57), the IKDC subjective score ( P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference ( P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies. Conclusion: The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Du ◽  
Wei-Jun Kong ◽  
Guang-Ru Cao ◽  
Zhi-Jun Xin ◽  
Jun Ao ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To investigate the 2-year follow-up outcomes of patients with cervical intervertebral disc herniation (CIVDH) after percutaneous full-endoscopic anterior transcorporeal cervical discectomy (PEATCD) and channel repair. Methods From Oct. 2016 to Mar. 2017, 24 patients with central/mediolateral CIVDH was treated with PEATCD and channel repair. Of the 24 cases, five interventions were performed at C3-C4 level, 11 were performed at C4-C5 level, and 8 were performed at C5-C6 level. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Radiographic outcomes were measured with X-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging.Results All the 24 procedures were completed successfully with an average operating time of 86.40±8.19min. Neck collar was advised for 3 weeks for all patients. No procedure-related complications were observed except for the swollen neck in 5 patients, which rehabilitated within 2 hours without sequela. The final scores of NDI, JOA, and VAS were improved significantly compared to those of preoperative assessments, 7.74±7.31 VS. 52.11±22.10, 16.04±0.68 VS. 9.08±1.31, and 0.52±0.65 VS. 6.73±1.45, respectively, P<0.05. Mean disc height was decreased from preoperative 5.43±0.52 mm to final 5.05±0.43 mm, without related-symptoms. No bone plug migration or channel collapse was measured during postoperative periods. All the channels were absent 12 months postoperative. Conclusion The most outstanding advantages of PEATCD with channel repair were “functional preservation” and “anatomical protection” for cervical spine, and which is a safe, feasible, effective, and minimally invasive surgery that offers an alternative for patients with CIVDH.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712097022
Author(s):  
Christian A. Cruz ◽  
Daniel Goldberg ◽  
Jeffrey Wake ◽  
Joshua Sy ◽  
Brian J. Mannino ◽  
...  

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft is associated with increased postoperative anterior knee pain and pain with kneeling and has the risk of intra- and postoperative patellar fracture. Additionally, graft-tunnel mismatch is problematic, often leading to inadequate osseous fixation. Given the disadvantages of BTB, an alternative is a bone-tendon autograft (BTA) procedure that has been developed at our institution. BTA is a patellar tendon autograft with the single bone plug taken from the tibia. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of BTA ACLR. We hypothesized that this procedure will provide noninferior failure rates and clinical outcomes when compared with a BTB autograft, as well as a lower incidence of anterior knee pain, pain with kneeling, and patellar fracture. Methods: A consecutive series of 52 patients treated with BTA ACLR were retrospectively identified and compared with 50 age-matched patients who underwent BTB ACLR. The primary outcome was ACL graft failure, while secondary outcomes included subjective instability, anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and functional outcome scores (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form). Results: At a mean follow-up of 29.3 months after surgery, there were 2 reruptures in the BTA cohort (4.0%) and 2 in the BTB cohort (4.0%). In the BTA group, 18% of patients reported anterior knee pain versus 36% of the BTB group ( P = .04). A total of 22% of patients noted pain or pressure with kneeling in the BTA cohort, as opposed to 48% in the BTB cohort ( P = .006). There were no differences in functional scores. In the BTA group, 94.2% of patients reported that their knees subjectively felt stable, as compared with 86% in the BTB group ( P = .18). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the BTA ACLR leads to similarly low rates of ACL graft failure requiring revision surgery, with significantly decreased anterior knee pain and kneeling pain when compared with a BTB. Additionally, the potential complications of graft-tunnel mismatch and patellar fracture are eliminated with the BTA ACLR technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document