motor cortex plasticity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

123
(FIVE YEARS 22)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Zeng ◽  
Ghazaleh Darmani ◽  
Anton Fomenko ◽  
Xue Xia ◽  
Stephanie Tran ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Ke Zeng ◽  
Ghazaleh Darmani ◽  
Anton Fomenko ◽  
Xue Xia ◽  
Stephanie Tran ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110175
Author(s):  
Muhammed Enes Gunduz ◽  
Kevin Pacheco-Barrios ◽  
Camila Bonin Pinto ◽  
Dante Duarte ◽  
Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez ◽  
...  

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups ( F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 718
Author(s):  
Shane M. Fresnoza ◽  
Giorgi Batsikadze ◽  
Lynn Elena Müller ◽  
Constanze Rost ◽  
Michael Chamoun ◽  
...  

Dopamine is crucial for neuroplasticity, which is considered to be the neurophysiological foundation of learning and memory. The specific effect of dopamine on plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) is determined by receptor subtype specificity, concentration level, and the kind of plasticity induction technique. In healthy human subjects, the dopamine precursor levodopa (L-DOPA) exerts a dosage-dependent non-linear effect on motor cortex plasticity. Low and high dosage L-DOPA impaired or abolished plasticity, while medium-dose preserved and reversed plasticity in previous studies. Similar dosage-dependent effects were also observed for selective D1-like and D2-like receptor activation that favor excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, respectively. However, such a dosage-dependent effect has not been explored for a nonselective dopamine agonist such as apomorphine in humans. To this aim, nonfocal and focal motor cortex plasticity induction using paired associative stimulation (PAS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were performed respectively in healthy participants under 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg apomorphine or placebo drug. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials were used to monitor motor cortical excitability alterations. We hypothesized that, similar to L-DOPA, apomorphine will affect motor cortex plasticity. The results showed that apomorphine with the applied dosages has an inhibitory effect for focal and nonfocal LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity, which was either abolished, diminished or reversed. The detrimental effect on plasticity induction under all dosages of apomorphine suggests a predominantly presynaptic mechanism of action of these dosages.


Author(s):  
Andrea Guerra ◽  
Francesco Asci ◽  
Alessandro Zampogna ◽  
Valentina D'Onofrio ◽  
Alfredo Berardelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document