dsRNA-induced condensation of antiviral proteins promotes PKR activation

Mammalian cells respond to dsRNA in multiple manners. One key response to dsRNA is the activation of PKR, an eIF2α kinase, which triggers translational arrest and the formation of stress granules. However, the process of PKR activation in cells is not fully understood. In response to increased endogenous or exogenous dsRNA, we observed that PKR forms novel cytosolic condensates, referred to as dsRNA-induced foci (dRIFs). dRIFs contain dsRNA, form in proportion to dsRNA, and are enhanced by longer dsRNAs. dRIFs also enrich several other dsRNA-binding proteins including ADAR1, Stau1, NLRP1, and PACT. Strikingly, dRIFs correlate with and form prior to translation repression by PKR and localize to regions of cells where PKR activation is initiated. We suggest that dRIF formation is a mechanism cells utilize to enhance the sensitivity of PKR activation in response to low levels of dsRNA, or to overcome viral inhibitors of PKR activation.

Epigenetic regulation of translation repression in ferroptosis, and a role of Alternative splicing and tRNA methylation.

Ferroptosis is a non-apoptotic cell death mechanism characterized by the production of lipid peroxides. Ferroptosis plays important roles in many diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. While many effectors in the ferroptosis pathway have been mapped, its epigenetic and epitranscriptional regulatory processes are not yet fully understood. Ferroptosis can be induced via system xCT inhibition (Class I) or GPX4 inhibition (Class II). Previous works have revealed important differences in cellular response to Class I and Class II ferroptosis inducers. Importantly, blocking mRNA transcription or translation appears to protect cells against Class I ferroptosis inducing agents but not Class II. Understanding these subtle differences is important in understanding ferroptosis as well as in developing therapeutics based on ferroptosis for various diseases. In this work, we examined the impact of blocking transcription (via Actinomycin D) or translation (via Cycloheximide) on Erastin (Class I) or RSL3 (Class II) induced ferroptosis. Blocking transcription or translation protected cells against Erastin but was detrimental against RSL3. Cycloheximide led to increased levels of GSH alone or when co-treated with Erastin and the activation of the reverse transsulfuration pathway. RNA sequencing analysis revealed an important and unexplored role of Alternative splicing (AS) in regulating ferroptosis stress response and mRNA translation repression. Our results indicated that translation repression is protective against Erastin but detrimental against RSL3. We tested this theory in Alkbh1 overexpressing glioma cells. Alkbh1 demethylates tRNA and represses translation and is associated with worse outcome in glioma patients. Our results showed that Alkbh1 overexpression protected glioma cells against Erastin but was detrimental against RSL3.

A specific eIF4A paralog facilitates LARP1-mediated translation repression during mTORC1 inhibition

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4A — a DEAD-box RNA-binding protein — plays an essential role in translation initiation. Two mammalian eIF4A paralogs, eIF4A1 and eIF4A2, have been assumed to be redundant because of their high homology, and the difference in their functions has been poorly understood. Here, we show that eIF4A1, but not eIF4A2, enhances translational repression during the inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), an essential kinase complex controlling cell proliferation. RNA-immunoprecipitation sequencing (RIP-Seq) of the two eIF4A paralogs revealed that eIF4A1 preferentially binds to mRNAs containing terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) motifs, whose translation is rapidly repressed upon mTOR inhibition. This biased interaction depends on a La-related RNA-binding protein, LARP1. Ribosome profiling revealed that the deletion of EIF4A1, but not EIF4A2, rendered the translation of TOP mRNAs resistant to mTOR inactivation. Moreover, eIF4A1 enhances the affinity between TOP mRNAs and LARP1 and thus ensures stronger translation repression upon mTORC1 inhibition. Our data show that the distinct protein interactions of these highly homologous translation factor paralogs shape protein synthesis during mTORC1 inhibition and provide a unique example of the repressive role of a universal translation activator.

ADAR1 limits stress granule formation through both translation-dependent and translation-independent mechanisms

Stress granules (SGs) are cytoplasmic assemblies of RNA and protein that form when translation is repressed during the integrated stress response (ISR). SGs assemble from the combination of RNA-RNA, RNA-protein, and protein-protein interactions between mRNPs. The protein Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) recognizes and modifies dsRNAs within cells to prevent an aberrant innate immune response. ADAR1 localizes to SGs, and since RNA-RNA interactions contribute to SG assembly and dsRNA induces SGs, we examined how ADAR1 affects SG formation. First, we demonstrate that ADAR1 depletion triggers SGs by allowing endogenous dsRNA to activate the ISR through PKR activation and translation repression. However, we also show that ADAR1 limits SG formation independently of translation inhibition. ADAR1 repression of SGs is independent of deaminase activity, but dependent on dsRNA-binding activity, suggesting a model where ADAR1 binding limits RNA-RNA and/or RNA-protein interactions necessary for recruitment to SGs. Given that ADAR1 expression is induced during viral infection, these findings have implications for ADAR1's role in the antiviral response.

mTORC1 promotes TOP mRNA translation through site-specific phosphorylation of LARP1

LARP1 is a key repressor of TOP mRNA translation. It binds the m7Gppp cap moiety and the adjacent 5′TOP motif of TOP mRNAs, thus impeding the assembly of the eIF4F complex on these transcripts. mTORC1 controls TOP mRNA translation via LARP1, but the details of the mechanism are unclear. Herein we elucidate the mechanism by which mTORC1 controls LARP1’s translation repression activity. We demonstrate that mTORC1 phosphorylates LARP1 in vitro and in vivo, activities that are efficiently inhibited by rapamycin and torin1. We uncover 26 rapamycin-sensitive phospho-serine and -threonine residues on LARP1 that are distributed in 7 clusters. Our data show that phosphorylation of a cluster of residues located proximally to the m7Gppp cap-binding DM15 region is particularly sensitive to rapamycin and regulates both the RNA-binding and the translation inhibitory activities of LARP1. Our results unravel a new model of translation control in which the La module (LaMod) and DM15 region of LARP1, both of which can directly interact with TOP mRNA, are differentially regulated: the LaMod remains constitutively bound to PABP (irrespective of the activation status of mTORC1), while the C-terminal DM15 ‘pendular hook’ engages the TOP mRNA 5′-end to repress translation, but only in conditions of mTORC1 inhibition.

RNA-binding proteins La and HuR cooperatively modulate translation repression of PDCD4 mRNA

Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression plays a critical role in controlling the inflammatory response. An uncontrolled inflammatory response results in chronic inflammation, often leading to tumorigenesis. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is a pro-inflammatory tumor-suppressor gene which helps to prevent the transition from chronic inflammation to cancer. PDCD4 mRNA translation is regulated by an interplay between the oncogenic microRNA miR-21 and the RNA-binding protein (RBP) HuR in response to LPS stimulation, but the role of other regulatory factors remain unknown. Here we report that the RBP Lupus antigen (La) interacts with the 3’UTR of PDCD4 mRNA and prevents miR-21-mediated translation repression. While LPS causes nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of HuR, it enhances cellular La expression. Remarkably, La and HuR were found to bind cooperatively to the PDCD4 mRNA and mitigate miR-21-mediated translation repression. The cooperative action of La and HuR reduced cell proliferation and enhanced apoptosis, reversing the pro-oncogenic function of miR-21. Together, these observations demonstrate a cooperative interplay between two RBPs, triggered differentially by the same stimulus, which exerts a synergistic effect on PDCD4 expression and thereby helps maintain a balance between inflammation and tumorigenesis.

Computational Identification and Comparative Analysis of Conserved miRNAs and Their Putative Target Genes in the Juglans regia and J. microcarpa Genomes

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important factors for the post-transcriptional regulation of protein-coding genes in plants and animals. They are discovered either by sequencing small RNAs or computationally. We employed a sequence-homology-based computational approach to identify conserved miRNAs and their target genes in Persian (English) walnut, Juglans regia, and its North American wild relative, J. microcarpa. A total of 119 miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs) were detected in the J. regia genome and 121 in the J. microcarpa genome and miRNA target genes were predicted and their functional annotations were performed in both genomes. In the J. regia genome, 325 different genes were targets; 87.08% were regulated by transcript cleavage and 12.92% by translation repression. In the J. microcarpa genome, 316 different genes were targets; 88.92% were regulated by transcript cleavage and 11.08% were regulated by translation repression. Totals of 1.3% and 2.0% of all resistance gene analogues (RGA) and 2.7% and 2.6% of all transcription factors (TFs) were regulated by miRNAs in the J. regia and J. microcarpa genomes, respectively. Juglans genomes evolved by a whole genome duplication (WGD) and consist of eight pairs of fractionated homoeologous chromosomes. Within each pair, the chromosome that has more genes with greater average transcription also harbors more pre-miRNAs and more target genes than its homoeologue. While only minor differences were detected in pre-miRNAs between the J. regia and J. microcarpa genomes, about one-third of the pre-miRNA loci were not conserved between homoeologous chromosome within each genome. Pre-miRNA and their corresponding target genes showed a tendency to be collocated within a subgenome.

eIF4G has intrinsic G-quadruplex binding activity that is required for tiRNA function

As cells encounter adverse environmental conditions, such as hypoxia, oxidative stress or nutrient deprivation, they trigger stress response pathways to protect themselves until transient stresses have passed. Inhibition of translation is a key component of such cellular stress responses and mounting evidence has revealed the importance of a class of tRNA-derived small RNAs called tiRNAs in this process. The most potent of these small RNAs are those with the capability of assembling into tetrameric G-quadruplex (G4) structures. However, the mechanism by which these small RNAs inhibit translation has yet to be elucidated. Here we show that eIF4G, the major scaffolding protein in the translation initiation complex, directly binds G4s and this activity is required for tiRNA-mediated translation repression. Targeting of eIF4G results in an impairment of 40S ribosome scanning on mRNAs leading to the formation of eIF2α-independent stress granules. Our data reveals the mechanism by which tiRNAs inhibit translation and demonstrates novel activity for eIF4G in the regulation of translation.

An ortholog of the Vasa intronic gene is required for small RNA-mediated translation repression inChlamydomonas reinhardtii

Small RNAs (sRNAs) associate with Argonaute (AGO) proteins in effector complexes, termed RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs), which regulate complementary transcripts by translation inhibition and/or RNA degradation. In the unicellular algaChlamydomonas, several metazoans, and land plants, emerging evidence indicates that polyribosome-associated transcripts can be translationally repressed by RISCs without substantial messenger RNA (mRNA) destabilization. However, the mechanism of translation inhibition in a polyribosomal context is not understood. Here we show thatChlamydomonasVIG1, an ortholog of theDrosophila melanogasterVasa intronic gene (VIG), is required for this process. VIG1 localizes predominantly in the cytosol and comigrates with monoribosomes and polyribosomes by sucrose density gradient sedimentation. AVIG1-deleted mutant shows hypersensitivity to the translation elongation inhibitor cycloheximide, suggesting that VIG1 may have a nonessential role in ribosome function/structure. Additionally, FLAG-tagged VIG1 copurifies with AGO3 and Dicer-like 3 (DCL3), consistent with it also being a component of the RISC. Indeed, VIG1 is necessary for the repression of sRNA-targeted transcripts at the translational level but is dispensable for cleavage-mediated RNA interference and for the association of the AGO3 effector with polyribosomes or target transcripts. Our results suggest that VIG1 is an ancillary ribosomal component and plays a role in sRNA-mediated translation repression of polyribosomal transcripts.