quantifying uncertainty
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

405
(FIVE YEARS 104)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Mackenzie E. Meyer ◽  
Matthew P. Byrne ◽  
Iain D. Boyd ◽  
Benjamin A. Jorns

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Zahid Khan ◽  
Afrah Al-Bossly ◽  
Mohammed M. A. Almazah ◽  
Fuad S. Alduais

In the absence of a correct distribution theory for complex data, neutrosophic algebra can be very useful in quantifying uncertainty. In applied data analysis, implementation of existing gamma distribution becomes inadequate for some applications when dealing with an imprecise, uncertain, or vague dataset. Most existing works have explored distributional properties of the gamma distribution under the assumption that data do not have any kind of indeterminacy. Yet, analytical properties of the gamma model for the more realistic setting when data involved uncertainties remain largely underdeveloped. This paper fills such a gap and develops the notion of neutrosophic gamma distribution (NGD). The proposed distribution represents a generalized structure of the existing gamma distribution. The basic distributional properties, including moments, shape coefficients, and moment generating function (MGF), are established. Several examples are considered to emphasize the relevance of the proposed NGD for dealing with circumstances with inadequate or ambiguous knowledge about the distributional characteristics. The estimation framework for treating vague parameters of the NGD is developed. The Monte Carlo simulation is implemented to examine the performance of the proposed model. The proposed model is applied to a real dataset for the purpose of dealing with inaccurate and vague statistical data. Results show that the NGD has better flexibility in handling real data over the conventional gamma distribution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiong Shen ◽  
Adria Ruiz ◽  
Antonio Agudo ◽  
Francesc Moreno-Noguer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Harrington ◽  
Carl-Friedrich Schleussner ◽  
Friederike E. L. Otto

AbstractHigh-level assessments of climate change impacts aggregate multiple perils into a common framework. This requires incorporating multiple dimensions of uncertainty. Here we propose a methodology to transparently assess these uncertainties within the ‘Reasons for Concern’ framework, using extreme heat as a case study. We quantitatively discriminate multiple dimensions of uncertainty, including future vulnerability and exposure to changing climate hazards. High risks from extreme heat materialise after 1.5–2 °C and very high risks between 2–3.5 °C of warming. Risks emerge earlier if global assessments were based on national risk thresholds, underscoring the need for stringent mitigation to limit future extreme heat risks.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Luiz da Silva ◽  
Boxuan Zhong ◽  
Yuhan Chen ◽  
Edgar Lobaton

Preprint of manuscript submitted to an IEEE Journal currently under revision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document