Disparities in Outcomes Among Patients Diagnosed With Cancer in Proximity to an Emergency Department Visit

A suspected diagnosis of cancer in the emergency department (ED) may be associated with poor outcomes, related to health disparities, however data are limited. This study is a case-control analysis of the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, and the Indiana Network for Patient Care. First time cancer diagnoses appearing in the registry between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Cases were patients who had an ED visit in the 6 months before their cancer diagnosis; controls had no recent ED visits. The primary outcome was mortality, comparing ED-associated mortality to non-ED-associated. 134,761 first-time cancer patients were identified, including 15,432 (11.5%) cases. The mean age was same at 65, more of the cases were Black than the controls (12.4% vs 7.4%, P<.0001) and more were low income (36.4%. vs 29.3%). The top 3 ED-associated cancer diagnoses were lung (18.4%), breast (8.9%), and colorectal cancers (8.9%), whereas the controls were breast (17%), lung (14.9%), and prostate cancers (10.1%). Cases observed an over three-fold higher mortality, with cumulative death rate of 32.9% for cases vs 9.0% for controls (P<.0001). Regression analysis predicting mortality, controlling for many confounders produced an odds ratio of 4.12 (95% CI 3.72-4.56 for cases). This study found that an ED visit within 6 months prior to the first time of ICD-coded cancer is associated with Black race, low income and an overall three-fold increased adjusted risk of death. The mortality rates for ED-associated cancers are uniformly worse for all cancer types. These data suggest that additional work is needed to reduce disparities among ED-associated cancer diagnoses.

Oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of pituitary adenoma: cohort and case-control analyses

Background No prospective epidemiologic studies have examined associations between use of oral contraceptives (OC) or menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and risk of pituitary adenoma in women. Methods We evaluated the association of OC/MHT with risk of pituitary adenoma in the Nurses’ Health Study and Nurses’ Health Study II by computing multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (MVHR) of pituitary adenoma by OC/MHT use using Cox proportional hazards models. Simultaneously, we carried out a matched case-control study using an institutional data repository to compute multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (MVOR) of pituitary adenoma by OC/MHT use. Results During 6,668,019 person-years, 331 participants reported a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. Compared to never-users, neither past (MVHR=1.05, 95%CI:0.80-1.36) nor current OC use (MVHR=0.72, 95%CI:0.40-1.32) was associated with risk. For MHT, compared to never-users, both past (MVHR=2.00, 95%CI:1.50-2.68) and current use (MVHR=1.80, 95%CI:1.27-2.55) were associated with pituitary adenoma risk, as was longer duration (MVHR=2.06, 95%CI:1.42-2.99 comparing &gt;5 years of use to never, p-trend=0.002). Results were similar in lagged analyses, when stratified by BMI, and among those with recent healthcare utilization. In the case-control analysis, we included 5,469 cases. Risk of pituitary adenoma was increased with ever use of MHT (MVOR=1.57, 95%CI 1.35-1.83) and OC (MVOR=1.27, 95%CI:1.14-1.42) compared to never. Conclusion Compared to never use, current and past MHT use and longer duration of MHT use were positively associated with higher risk of pituitary adenoma in two independent datasets. OC use was not associated with risk in the prospective cohort analysis and was associated with only mildly increased risk in the case-control analysis.

Waning of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies targeting the Spike protein in individuals post second dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines and risk of breakthrough infections: analysis of the Virus Watch community cohort.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines stimulate production of antibodies targeting the spike protein (anti-S). The level of antibodies following vaccination and trajectories of waning may differ between vaccines influencing the level of protection, how soon protection is reduced and, consequently the optimum timing of booster doses. Methods: We measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-S titre in the context of seronegativity for SARS-CoV-2 anti-Nucleocapsid (anti-N), in samples collected between 1st July and 24th October 2021 in a subset of adults in the Virus Watch community cohort. We compared anti-S levels after BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer) or ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca/Oxford) vaccination using time since second dose of vaccination, age, sex and clinical vulnerability to investigate antibody waning. To investigate the use of anti-S levels as a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, we undertook a survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier and Cox) with individuals entering 21 days after their second dose of vaccine, or first antibody test after 1st July (whichever was latest) and exiting with the outcome of SARS-Cov-2 infection or at the end of follow up 24th October 2021. We also undertook a negative test design case-control analysis of infections occurring after the second vaccine dose (breakthrough infections) to determine whether the type of vaccine affected the risk of becoming infected. Results: 24049 samples from 8858 individuals (5549 who received a second dose of ChAdOx1 and 3205 BNT162b2) who remained anti-N negative were included in the analysis of anti-S waning over time. Three weeks after the second dose of vaccine BNT162b2 mean anti-S levels were 9039 (95%CI: 7946-10905) U/ml and ChadOx1 were 1025 (95%CI: 917-1146) U/ml. For both vaccines, waning anti-S levels followed a log linear decline from three weeks after the second dose of vaccination. At 20 weeks after the second dose of vaccine, the mean anti-S levels were 1521 (95%CI: 1432-1616) U/ml for BNT162b2 and 342 (95%CI: 322-365) U/ml for ChadOx1. We identified 197 breakthrough infections and found a reduced risk of infection post second dose of vaccine for individuals with anti-S levels greater than or equal to 500 U/ml compared to those with levels under 500 U/ml (HR 0.62; 95%CIs:0.44-0.87; p=0.007). Time to reach an anti-S threshold of 500 U/ml was estimated at 96 days for ChAdOx1 and 257 days for BNT162b2. We found an increased risk of a breakthrough infection for those who received the ChAdOx1 compared to those who received BNT162b2 (OR: 1.43, 95% CIs:1.18-1.73, p<0.001). Discussion: Anti-S levels are substantially higher following the second dose of BNT162b2 compared to ChAdOx1. There is a log linear waning in levels for both vaccines following the second dose. Anti-S levels are an important correlate of protection as demonstrated by those with anti-S levels < 500U/ml following vaccination being at significantly greater risk of subsequent infection. Since anti-S levels are substantially lower in ChAdOx1 than in BNT162b2 and both decline at similar rates we would expect waning immunity to occur earlier in ChAdOx1 compared to BNT162b2. Our results showing an increased risk of breakthrough infections for those who were vaccinated with ChAdOx1 compared to BNT162b2 are in line with this hypothesis. Consistent with our data, national analyses of vaccine effectiveness also suggest that waning of immunity for infection and, to a lesser extent for severe disease, is seen earlier in ChAdOx1 than in BNT162b2. Our data demonstrate the importance of booster doses to maintain protection in the elderly and clinically vulnerable and suggest that these should be prioritised to those who received ChAdOx1 as their primary course.

Varicella zoster virus-induced neurological disease after COVID-19 vaccination: a retrospective monocentric study

The description of every possible adverse effect or event related to vaccines is mandatory during the ongoing worldwide COVID-19 vaccination program. Although cases of cutaneous varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination have been increasingly reported in literature and database sets, a description of VZV-induced neurological disease (VZV-ND) is still lacking. In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated patients admitted to our clinic and diagnosed with VZV-ND during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign (January–April 2021) and in the same months in the previous two years. We identified three patients with VZV-ND after COVID-19 vaccination and 19 unvaccinated VZV-ND cases as controls. In the case–control analysis, the two groups showed no difference in clinical features, results of diagnostic investigations, and outcome. Thus, VZV reactivation with neurological involvement might be a possible event triggered by COVID-19 vaccination, but the benefit following COVID-19 vaccination overcomes significantly the potential risk associated with a VZV reactivation.

Bloodstream Infection Following Cardiac Valve Repair: A Population-Based Study

Background The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, epidemiology, and associated risk factors of bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients who had previously undergone cardiac valve repair. Methods A population-based study that included 7 counties in southeastern Minnesota using the expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project (e-REP) for adults (≥18 years) who underwent valve repair between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018 was conducted. Electronic health records were screened for development of BSI and infective endocarditis (IE) from the date of valve repair through 30 July 2020. A 1:4 nested case-control analysis was performed to determine an association, if any, of male sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and county of residence with BSI. Results A total of 335 patients underwent valve repair, of whom 28 (8.3%) developed an index case of BSI, with 14 episodes occurring within 1 year of surgery. The median age of patients with BSI was 70 years, and 79% were male. The crude incidence of BSI was 1671 cases per 100000 person-years and Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen. Case-control analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between CCI and incidence of BSI (P &lt; .001). Only 4 (14.3%) patients developed IE concurrent with the onset of BSI, and no patients developed IE subsequent to BSI. Conclusions The crude incidence of BSI following valve repair was higher in our e-REP cohort than previous population-based studies, and half of the BSI cases occurred within 1 year of surgery. Patients with a higher CCI at baseline were at increased risk of subsequent BSI.