Home Health Agencies With More Socially Vulnerable Patients Have Poorer Experience of Care Ratings

Objectives Examine the relationships between dual eligibility and race/ethnicity characteristics of Medicare-Certified Home Health Agencies (CHHAs) and experience of care ratings. Methods Analysis of 2017 national Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and matched datasets of 10,906 CHHAs Results CHHAs with higher concentrations of dual-eligible patients were less likely to have high experience of care ratings for all three domains (e.g., for care delivery, quartile 4 vs. 1: odds ratio [OR] = 0.622, p < .001); CHHAs with higher concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities generally were less likely to have high experience of care ratings in care delivery (e.g., Black: quartile 4 vs. 1: OR = 0.418, p<0.001), communication (e.g., Black: quartile 4 vs. 1: OR = 0.316, p<0.001), and specific care issues (e.g., Hispanic: quartile 4 vs. 1: OR = 0.397, p < .001). Discussion CHHAs with greater concentrations of dual-eligible patients and racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to have poor experience of care ratings.

Ohio's Large Scale Experiment on Integrated Care: Results and Implications for Long-Term Services Reform

Implemented through five health plans, Ohio’s MyCare demonstration began in 2014 and was designed to coordinate primary, acute care, behavioral health and long-term services in the major urban areas of the state. Individuals who are dually eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare and who reside in specified geographic regions must enroll into a managed MyCare plan. MyCare beneficiaries are assigned to two primary categories: community well and those needing long-term services and supports (LTSS). Individuals receiving the integrated MyCare intervention were expected to have lower acute care hospitalizations, lower long-term nursing home use, better longevity and lower overall health and long-term care costs. Using a propensity score matching design, the evaluation compared MyCare enrollees to comparison group members in non-MyCare counties of the state, using Medicaid and Medicare claims data. The 120,000 MyCare program participants represented about half of the dual eligible individuals in the state.

A Typology of Health Services Regulated in U.S. Assisted Living Communities

State agencies regulate assisted living (AL) with varying approaches across and within states. The implications of this variation for resident case mix, health service use, and policy, are not well described. We collected health services-relevant AL regulatory requirements for all 50 states and DC and used a mixed-methods approach (thematic analysis; k-means cluster analysis) to identify six types: Housing, Affordable, Hybrid, Hospitality, Healthcare, and Hybrid-Healthcare. We stratified Medicare claims data by regulatory type, identifying variation in resident case mix and health service use. Housing and Affordable clusters have larger proportions of dual-eligible beneficiaries, Black residents, and residents of Affordable had more long-term nursing home use compared to other clusters. Dual-eligible beneficiaries account for 26.6% of Housing cluster residents compared to 8.1% of Hybrid Healthcare cluster residents. We provide other examples and explain the implications in terms of sampling AL for single and multi-state studies, racial disparities, and health-related policies.

Ohio’s Dual Eligible Population: Effects of Program Design and Implementation on Care Management

MyCare Ohio is a prospective blended managed care payment model program tasked to provide comprehensive and coordinated care to Ohio residents who are dully eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. To understand the administration and day-to-day implementation of care management within MyCare Ohio, n=75 interviews with a total of n=331 personnel from Area Agencies on Aging, Managed Care Plans, and service providers were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and checked for accuracy. Data were analyzed by iterative reviews and deductive coding in Dedoose. Respondents provided insights on how care management activities are affected by program design features (e.g., ability to opt-out of the Medicare component), transitions between acute and long-term care settings, documentation systems and data-sharing, and high numbers of beneficiaries with behavioral health diagnoses. Implications for practice and policy will be discussed.

Social Isolation as a Risk Factor for Cigarette Smoking in Older Adults

Objective This study examined the prevalence of social isolation and cigarette smoking in a national sample of community-dwelling older adults, and assessed the role of social isolation on the risk of cigarette smoking. Methods Using data from 8,044 participants (age 65+ years) across two waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we analyzed the prevalence of social isolation in older adults and as a risk factor for cigarette smoking. Social isolation was measured across 4 relationship domains (Cudjoe, 2018) on a scale of 0 to 4, using objective measures of social interactions. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess how social isolation is associated with smoking. Results Preliminary results showed that 18.2% of older adults were socially isolated (3.5% severely isolated) and 7.1% of participants reported current smoking. We found that both social isolation (OR = 2.5, p&lt;.001) and severe isolation (OR = 5.9, p&lt;.001) increased the odds of smoking. Also, older adults with depression (OR = 1.6, p&lt;.01) and dual-eligible beneficiaries (Medicare and Medicaid) with TRICARE coverage (OR = 4.6, p&lt;.05) had greater odds of smoking. However, we did not find evidence that the odds of smoking varied significantly by the number of chronic conditions. Conclusion Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of cigarette smoking among older adults. Smoking may be an important behavior in the pathway between social isolation and its association with morbidity and mortality.

Racial Disparities in Use of Memory Care and Prevalence of Duals in Assisted Living

Assisted living (AL) communities with memory care licenses are disproportionately located in affluent and predominantly White communities and Black older adults are underrepresented in AL. But little is known about characteristics of AL that care for Black residents. We estimated the association of facility-level characteristics as proxy measures for AL resources, such as memory care designations and percentage of dual-eligible residents, across low (0-5%), medium (5-10%) and high (&gt;10%) percentages of Black residents. We found broad differences among communities in the three levels of Black-resident prevalence. High percentage of Black residents was associated with large differences in the percentage of Medicaid-enrolled residents (high 54% duals [s.d.=34], med 28% [31], low=13% [22], p&lt;0.001). ALs with high Black populations were less likely to have a memory-care designation than ALs with medium and low percentages of Black residents (high 4.7% memory care, med 11%, low 17%).

Home Health Agencies With More Socially Vulnerable Patients Have Lower Experience-of-Care Ratings

Little is known about the disparities in patient experience of home health (HH) care related to social vulnerability. This study examined the relationships of patient Medicare-Medicaid dual eligible status and race and ethnicity with patient experience of HH care. We analyzed national data from the Home Health Care Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HHCAHPS), Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare claims and Area Health Resources File for 11,137 Medicare-certified HH agencies (HHA) that provided care for Medicare beneficiaries in 2017. Patient-reported experience of care star ratings (1-5) in HHCAHPS included 3 domains (professional care delivery, effective communication, and specific issues in direct patient care) with each dichotomized into high (4-5) and low (1-3) experience of care. The proportion of patients with dual eligibility and the proportion of racial/ethnic minorities were summarized at the HHA level. HHA with higher proportion of dual eligible patients were less likely to have high experience of care rating in professional care delivery (smallest Odds Ratio [OR]=0.514; 95% CI: 0.397, 0.665; p&lt;0.001), effective communication (smallest OR=0.442, 95% CI: 0.336, 0.583; p&lt;0.001), and specific direct care issues (smallest OR=0.697, 95% CI: 0.540, 0.899; p=0.006). HHA with higher proportion of racial/ethnic minorities were also less likely to have high patient experience of care rating across all three domains (smallest OR=0.265, 95% CI: 0.189, 0.370; p&lt;0.001). Disparities in patient experience of HH care exist and they are associated with low income and racial/ethnic minority status, indicating substantial unmet needs among these socially vulnerable patients.

Multimorbidity among Diverse Communities in New England: Findings from the Healthy Aging Data Reports

The risk for multimorbidity increases with age. Community burden of comorbidities in New England (NE) was assessed by comparing state and community rates of two measures (having no comorbidities and having 4 or more) among Medicare beneficiaries age 65+ in CT, MA, NH, and RI. Data sources were the Medicare Current Beneficiary Summary File (2014-2017) and the American Community Survey (2014-2018). Small area estimation techniques were used to calculate age-sex adjusted community rates. Multimorbidity was measured as people with zero or with 4 or more of the following chronic conditions: Alzheimer’s disease, asthma, atrial fibrillation, cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate), kidney disease, COPD, depression, diabetes, congestive heart failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, arthritis, and stroke. Rates for 4+ conditions: RI 63.8% (45.76-70.69%), CT 61.8% (47.82-70.05%), MA 60.7% (40-74.96%), NH 54.4% (36.67-62.99%). Results were mapped, showing the statewide and regional distribution of rates. Rates were much higher for having 4+ chronic conditions than not having any comorbidities. RI had the highest rates of 4+ and in MA the highest chronic disease rates were found in lower socioeconomic communities. CT has the highest number of diverse older residents and dual-eligible beneficiaries for Medicare and Medicaid in NE. The rates show late-life health disparities that have implications for independent living, quality of life, and mortality suggesting the need for policies to provide equitable access to care and resources to disadvantaged NE communities.