ozone monitoring
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

498
(FIVE YEARS 81)

H-INDEX

55
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quintus Kleipool ◽  
Nico Rozemeijer ◽  
Mirna van Hoek ◽  
Jonatan Leloux ◽  
Erwin Loots ◽  
...  

Abstract. The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) was launched on July 15, 2004, with an expected mission lifetime of 5 years. After more than 17 years in orbit the instrument is still functioning satisfactorily, and in principle can continue doing so for many years more. In order to continue the datasets acquired by OMI and the Microwave Limb Sounder the mission was extended up to at least 2023. Actions have been taken to ensure the proper functioning of the OMI instrument operations, the data processing, and the calibration monitoring system until the eventual end of the mission. For the data processing a new level 0 to level 1b data processor was built based on the recent developments for Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). With corrections for the degradation of the instrument now included, it is feasible to generate a new data collection to supersede the current collection 3 data products. This paper describes the differences between the collection 3 and collection 4 data. It will be shown that the collection 4 L1b data is a clear improvement with respect to the previous collections. By correcting for the gentle optical and electronic aging that has occurred over the past 17 years, OMI's ability to make trend-quality ozone measurements has further improved.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Weber ◽  
Carlo Arosio ◽  
Melanie Coldewey-Egbers ◽  
Vitali Fioletov ◽  
Stacey M. Frith ◽  
...  

Abstract. We report on updated trends using different merged zonal mean total ozone datasets from satellite and ground-based observations for the period from 1979 to 2020. This work is an update from the trends reported in Weber et al. (2018) using the same datasets up to 2016. Merged datasets used in this study include NASA MOD v8.7 and NOAA Cohesive Data (COH) v8.6, both based on data from the series of Solar Backscatter UltraViolet (SBUV), SBUV-2, and Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) satellite instruments (1978–present) as well as the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME)-type Total Ozone (GTO-ECV) and GOME-SCIAMACHY-GOME-2 (GSG) merged datasets (both 1995–present), mainly comprising satellite data from GOME, SCIAMACHY, OMI, GOME-2A, -2B, and TROPOMI. The fifth dataset consists of the annual mean zonal mean data from ground-based measurements collected at the World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Center (WOUDC). Trends were determined by applying a multiple linear regression (MLR) to annual mean zonal mean data. The addition of four more years consolidated the fact that total ozone is indeed on slowly recovering in both hemispheres as a result of phasing out ozone depleting substances (ODS) as mandated by the Montreal Protocol. The near global ozone trend of the median of all datasets after 1996 was 0.5 ± 0.2 (2σ) %/decade, which is in absolute numbers roughly a third of the decreasing rate of 1.4 ± 0.6 %/decade from 1978 until 1996. The ratio of decline and increase is nearly identical to that of the EESC (equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine or stratospheric halogen) change rates before and after 1996 which confirms the success of the Montreal Protocol. The observed trends are also in very good agreement with the median of 17 chemistry climate models from CCMI (Chemistry Climate Model Initiative) with current ODS and GHG (greenhouse gas) scenarios. The positive ODS related trends in the NH after 1996 are only obtained with a sufficient number of terms in the MLR accounting properly for dynamical ozone changes (Brewer-Dobson circulation, AO, AAO). A standard MLR (limited to solar, QBO, volcanic, and ENSO) leads to zero trends showing that the small positive ODS related trends have been balanced by negative trend contributions from atmospheric dynamics resulting in nearly constant total ozone levels since 2000.


Author(s):  
Nguyen Ha Trang ◽  
Nguyen Thi Tuyet Nam

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the atmosphere can be measured using the tropospheric NO2 columns, indicating the number of molecules of NO2 in an atmospheric column from the ground surface to the top of the atmosphere above a square centimeter of the surface. In this study, the temporal variations of tropospheric NO2 columns in Vietnam during 2015–2020 were investigated. To do this, data on the columnar NO2 obtained from the Ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) onboard the NASA’s Earth orbiting satellite Aura were used. Consequently, northeastern Vietnam showed the highest values of the tropospheric NO2 columns over the whole study period (2015–2020), suggesting that this area would be a hot spot of NO2 pollution in Vietnam. In addition, the lowest and highest mean levels of columnar NO2 were found in 2020 and 2016, respectively. However, there is no statistical significance among the columnar NO2 in 2015–2020. Regarding the monthly variation, March and April exhibited the highest levels of tropospheric NO2 columns, which would be affected by frequent combustion activities (e.g., post-harvesting combustion) and meteorological conditions, such as lower air temperature. Results of this study can contribute to an understanding of NO2 pollution in Vietnam over long period.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 7775-7807
Author(s):  
Christophe Lerot ◽  
François Hendrick ◽  
Michel Van Roozendael ◽  
Leonardo M. A. Alvarado ◽  
Andreas Richter ◽  
...  

Abstract. We present the first global glyoxal (CHOCHO) tropospheric column product derived from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on board the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite. Atmospheric glyoxal results from the oxidation of other non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) and from direct emissions caused by combustion processes. Therefore, this product is a useful indicator of VOC emissions. It is generated with an improved version of the BIRA-IASB scientific retrieval algorithm relying on the differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) approach. Among the algorithmic updates, the DOAS fit now includes corrections to mitigate the impact of spectral misfits caused by scene brightness inhomogeneity and strong NO2 absorption. The product comes along with a full error characterization, which allows for providing random and systematic error estimates for every observation. Systematic errors are typically in the range of 1 ×1014–3 ×1014 molec. cm−2 (∼30 %–70 % in emission regimes) and originate mostly from a priori data uncertainties and spectral interferences with other absorbing species. The latter may be at the origin, at least partly, of an enhanced glyoxal signal over equatorial oceans, and further investigation is needed to mitigate them. Random errors are large (>6×1014 molec. cm−2) but can be reduced by averaging observations in space and/or time. Benefiting from a high signal-to-noise ratio and a large number of small-size observations, TROPOMI provides glyoxal tropospheric column fields with an unprecedented level of detail. Using the same retrieval algorithmic baseline, glyoxal column data sets are also generated from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura and from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) on board Metop-A and Metop-B. Those four data sets are intercompared over large-scale regions worldwide and show a high level of consistency. The satellite glyoxal columns are also compared to glyoxal columns retrieved from ground-based Multi-AXis DOAS (MAX-DOAS) instruments at nine stations in Asia and Europe. In general, the satellite and MAX-DOAS instruments provide consistent glyoxal columns both in terms of absolute values and variability. Correlation coefficients between TROPOMI and MAX-DOAS glyoxal columns range between 0.61 and 0.87. The correlation is only poorer at one mid-latitude station, where satellite data appear to be biased low during wintertime. The mean absolute glyoxal columns from satellite and MAX-DOAS generally agree well for low/moderate columns with differences of less than 1×1014 molec. cm−2. A larger bias is identified at two sites where the MAX-DOAS columns are very large. Despite this systematic bias, the consistency of the satellite and MAX-DOAS glyoxal seasonal variability is high.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sekiya ◽  
Kazuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
Henk Eskes ◽  
Kengo Sudo ◽  
Masayuki Takigawa ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study gives a systematic comparison of the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) version 1.2 and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) QA4ECV tropospheric NO2 column through global chemical data assimilation (DA) integration for the period April−May 2018. DA performance is controlled by measurement sensitivities, retrieval errors, and coverage. The smaller mean relative observation errors by 16 % in TROPOMI than OMI over 60° N−60° S during April−May 2018 led to larger reductions in the global root mean square error (RMSE) against the assimilated NO2 measurements in TROPOMI DA (by 54 %) than in OMI DA (by 38 %). Agreements against the independent surface, aircraft-campaign, and ozonesonde observation data were also improved by TROPOMI DA compared to the control model simulation (by 12−84 % for NO2 and by 7−40 % for ozone), which were more obvious than those by OMI DA for many cases (by 2−70 % for NO2 and by 1−22 % for ozone). The estimated global total NOx emissions were 15 % lower in TROPOMI DA, with 2−23 % smaller regional total emissions, in line with the observed negative bias of the TROPOMI version 1.2 product compared to the OMI QA4ECV product. TROPOMI DA can provide city scale emission estimates, which were within 10 % differences with other high-resolution analyses for several limited areas, while providing a globally consistent analysis. These results demonstrate that TROPOMI DA improves global analyses of NO2 and ozone, which would also benefit studies on detailed spatial and temporal variations in ozone and nitrate aerosols and the evaluation of bottom-up NOx emission inventories.


2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 124105
Author(s):  
Alina Lozina ◽  
Igor Garkusha ◽  
Anton Taran ◽  
Yuri Nezovibat’ko ◽  
Oleg Chechelnitskyi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria F. Sofieva ◽  
Risto Hänninen ◽  
Mikhail Sofiev ◽  
Monika Szelag ◽  
Hei Shing Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document