Istidlal Batalnya Wudlu (Perspektif Imam Hanafi dan Imam Syafi’i)

<p><em>This study aims to determine 1) How is Istidlal (the process of searching for and using arguments) to invalidate ablution according to Imam Hanafi and Imam Syafii and 2) What are the factors that cause the difference of opinion between Imam Hanafi and Imam Shafii regarding the cancellation of ablution. The research method used in this study is descriptive qualitative with a comparative approach that compares the opinions of two scholars about the cancellation of wudlu. The research results obtained are: 1) Istidlal: Imam Hanafi's istidlal regarding the cancellation of ablution was inspired by analogues and qiyas, because he was nicknamed "ahlu alra'yu", while Imam Shafi'i's istidlal regarding the cancellation of ablution is to look for the rules and ushul of the problem of canceling wudlu, then after finding him combine it with a valid argument or basis and this is also chosen from a valid argument. 2) Factors: The factors that cause differences of opinion between Imam Hanafi and Imam Shafi'i regarding the cancellation of ablution are the time or era factor, the scientific factor possessed, the legal basis used, the search for a legal basis in determining the law, and the experience factor.</em></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui, 1) <em>Istidlal</em> (proses pencarian dan penggunaan dalil) batalnya wudlu menurut Imam Hanafi dan Imam Syafii dan 2) Faktor-faktor apakah yang menyebabkan perbadaan pendapat antara Imam Hanafi dan Imam Syafii tentang batalnya wudlu. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan komparatif yang membandingkan pendapat dua ulama tentang batalnya wudlu. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah1)<em>Istidlal</em> Imam Hanafi tentang batalnya wudlu diilhami dengan analog dan qiyas, karena beliau dijuluki <em>”ahlu alra’yu”,</em>sedangkan <em>istidlal</em> Imam Syafi’i tentang batalnya wudlu yaitu dengan mencari kaidah-kaidah dan ushul dari permasalahan batalnya wudlu, kemudian setelah ditemukan beliau memadukan dengan dalil atau dasar yang dan ini pun dipilih dari dalil yang sahih. 2) Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan perbedaan pendapat antara Imam Hanafi dan Imam Syafi’i tentang batalnya wudlu adalah faktor masa atau zaman, faktor Keilmuan yang dimiliki, faktor dasar hukum yang digunakan, faktor pencarian dasar hukum dalam menetapkan hukum, dan faktor Pengalaman.</p><p><em><br /></em></p>

قضية خلق القرآن عند الجبرية والمعتزلة وأهل السنة

The discussion of khalqul qur'an is a very crucial issue among the Mutakallimin. The Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah groups say that the Qur'an is a creature in order to purify Allah from human-like characteristics. In fact, saying khalqul qur'an (the Qur'an is a creature) is the same as negating the nature of God, in the form of kalam. Belief like this will lead to three imperatives: first, as if God as the essence of the nature is a creature. Second, Allah is a mute Rabb, while being mute is a deficiency trait. Third, Allah's knowledge is a creature, because the Qur'an is His knowledge, then how could Allah have created knowledge first in order to have knowledge. Therefore the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah are unanimously agreed that the Qur'an is kalamullah. Among the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah who are very firm in defending the beliefs of the Sunnah are Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. He not only gave strong arguments, but also refuted the group that said khalqul qur'an with a solid rebuttal. Based on a qualitative method and a comparative critical approach, it was found that, first, Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah agreed that the Qur'an was a creature. Second, the Sunnah experts in general and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in particular insist that the Qur'an is the kalamullah. Third, when their arguments are found, the strongest is the opinion of the Ahli Sunnah. The basis for this difference of opinion is based on their beliefs about the nature of Allah.

The Concept of Originality in Academic Research of Engineering

The definition of research appears to be a controversial subject in the academic community. It is almost becoming apparent that research remains a key element in master’s and doctoral degrees. Originality is, to varying degrees, the primary concern for the genuineness of research, but there is a difference of opinion on the concept of originality. In practice, a subjective analysis of originality is performed at the time of the assessment of the said degrees’ theses; therefore, the resulting evaluation is affected by the difference of opinion on the concept of originality. It has also emerged that the concept of originality in research is also marginally unique in various areas. This study is focused upon reaching a point of agreement for the definition of originality in the theses/dissertation of masters and doctorate degrees in engineering only. The outcome of the research should be something new and originally contribute to the body of knowledge. This study focused on to arrive at an accurate definition of originality in university degrees in the field of engineering. An online survey was designed and carried out on the basis of evidence and expert opinion. The survey was distributed amongst engineering peers. The results of the survey are systematically summed up in the study.

احادیث سحر کا مسئلہ عصمت انبیاءکے تناظر میں تحقیقی جائزہ

The existence of the effects of magic is proved by the Holy Qur'an, it can not be denied, but the question arises whether the effects of magic also affect the Prophets? It is narrated in many Ahadith the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was effected by evil magic while magic was done. Now the basic question is that how did the magic happen and the existence of magic is against the glory of the Prophet, isn't it? There is a difference of opinion among the Islamic Scholars on the subject. In the lying article,after researching the correct sequence of sorcery in the context of ahadiths, it has been clarified that the effect of sorcery on the Prophets is a human requirement because sorcery is a disease like other diseases and it is not against the infallibility of the Prophets (Asmat-e-Anbya).

Correlation of lip profile preferences in Pakistani population; and its comparison with orthodontic norms

Objective: To determine the most desired lip profile and compare the subjective sense of aesthetics among orthodontists, general dentists and the general population. Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Orthodontic Department of the Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 1 to February 25, 2020, and comprised different silhouettes for each gender with increasing lip procumbence from -6mm to +6mm with respect to Rickett’s E-line which were created using Photoshop CS 8.0 after cephalometric analysis of 20 cephalograms. The sample comprised an equal number of orthodontists in group A, general dentists in group B and orthodontic treatment-seekers in group C with equal representation of the two genders. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. Results: Of the 180 subjects, there were 60(33.3%) in each of the three groups, with 30(50%) males and as many females in all the groups. All the three groups preferred the average lip profile for males (p=0.018) and 2mm procumbent lips for females (p=0.008). There was significant difference of opinion between groups A and C (p=0.034) and between groups B and C (p=0.022). Conclusion: There was found to be a marked difference of opinion among the orthodontists, the general dentists and the orthodontic treatment-seekers regarding the desired lip profile. Key Words: Aesthetics, Pakistani population, Cephalometrics, Lip profile. Continuous...

Hak dan Batas Masa Ḥaḍānah Anak Pasca Perceraian Menurut Mazhab Syāfi’ī dan Hanbali

This study aims to determine the rights and limitations of parenting after parental divorce in the view of the Syafi' and Hanbali schools. Qualitative descriptive method (non-statistical) is a type of library research, focused on the study of manuscripts and texts, and uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this study indicate that both schools agree that the right to care for children aged 0-7 years is the right of the mother, both male and female. The difference of opinion between the two schools lies in boys aged 7 years, the Shafi'i school argues that children who are able to choose are given the opportunity to choose between their parents, while the Hanbali school argues that children aged 7 years -old children can have custody. from his parents. both parents, if they do not agree then the child is asked to make a choice. Meanwhile, girls who are 7 years old until they reach puberty must be raised by their father according to the Hanbali school, in contrast to the Shafi'i school which still gives the same choices as boys.

Batas Waktu Mengqasar Salat bagi Musafir Menurut Ulama Empat Mazhab

The purpose of this research; 1) to find out the opinions of four mazhab scholars on the issue of the time limit for a traveler to be able to make up his prayers, the background of the differences and the opinion that is rajih. This research uses qualitative research through library research. Methods of normative theological approach and comparative approach. Research results; First, the Hanafi Mazhab: a traveler can make up his prayers for 15 days. Maliki and Shafi'i Mazhab; A traveler may make up his prayers for 4 days other than the day he arrives and leaves. Hanbali Mazhab: a traveler may make up his prayer for 4 days or 20 times of obligatory prayer, including the day of arrival and departure. The rajih views are the Shafi'i and Maliki Mazhab; Second, differences of opinion occur because this issue includes issues that are not explicitly discussed in the Shari'a ('amrun maskuutun 'anhu fi al-syar'i) so that each opinion is only guided by the conditions and actions quoted from the Prophet. The reason is because this issue is a problem that is not explicitly discussed in the Shari'a ('amrun maskuutun 'anhu fi al-syar'i). This triggers a difference of opinion regarding the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad. about traveling; Third, the opinion that is rajih in this matter is the opinion of the Shafi'i Mazhab and the Maliki Mazhab.

نواقض الوضوء عند الشافعية والحنابلة (دراسة مقارنة)

Ablution is a great form of taharah so Sharia makes it a legal condition of prayer. The four schools have agreed on most problems related to ablution, such as its pillars, its obligations, its circumcision and its nullifiers, but they are also different in some ways. This study aims to find out the opinions of Shafi'i and Hanbali schools about ablution and things which invalidate it, as well as strong opinions of both. The scientific methods used to achieve results are inductive-deductive and comparison methods. The results showed that the things which invalidate it according to the Shafi'i school there are four things and according to the Hanbali school there are seven. Then there is the difference of opinion between the two schools in this matter on four points, namely: the feces coming out of the body as thing can invalidate the ablution, sleeping while sitting, touching women and eating camel meat. This research is expected to contribute in the field of comparative jurisprudence of schools, especially in the problem of nullifiers of ablution according to Shafi'i and Hanbali schools, and increasing knowledge in this matter.

Iddah of Women Who Had Abortus In The Book of Mughni Al-Muhtaj and Mukhtashar Khalil in Perspective of Maqasid Shari'ah

Iddah is a period of waiting for a woman not to carry out a marriage after the death or divorce of her husband until the time limit determined by syara '. As for the iddah period for a woman who is pregnant until she gives birth. However, the problem that arises in this life is what if the woman has an abortion. In this matter, there is a difference of opinion in the books of Mughni al-Muhtaj and Mukhtashar Khalil about the end of the iddah period of a woman who has an abortion. This research aims to find out how the opinions of the two books about iddah women who experience abortion and what causes differences of opinion, and which opinion is chosen. This research is a type of library research, which is descriptive with qualitative analysis, and the primary data source used is the book of Mughni al-Muhtaj and Mukhtashar Khalil. This study indicates that the difference in opinion is due to differences in the book's writers in interpreting the word al-haml and the rules of ushul fiqih used. Moreover, from the two opinions, Muhammad Khatib asy-Syarbaini in the book Mughni al-Muhtaj which was chosen because it followed the wisdom of determining iddah.