rp process
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

148
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gerken ◽  
S. Almaraz-Calderon ◽  
B. W. Asher ◽  
E. Lopez-Saveedra ◽  
L. T. Baby ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1643 ◽  
pp. 012064
Author(s):  
W. A. Richter ◽  
B. Alex Brown ◽  
R. Longland ◽  
C. Wrede ◽  
C. Fry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (40) ◽  
pp. 559-588
Author(s):  
Sawsan Kareem Zghayyir Al-Saaidi ◽  
Abdul-Ameer Hassan Al-Ubaidi

        Peer review (RP) process as an academic genre is a pivotal step to certify the research quality to be published by enhancing peer perspectives and imparting credibility. The aim of this paper is to scrutinise the formal, cognitive structuring, the significant evaluative features and pragmatic value. To address this aim, a framework based on Bhatia’s (1993) cognitive structuring model and Fortanet's (2008) model of moves is adopted to analyse two referees' reports from two various disciplines namely Social Sciences and Veterinary Medicine solicited from Iraqi academicians. The findings unravel that there is a special format that followed by referees in their reports concerning the balanced use of positive/ negative comments along with the structural organization adopted. The generic structuring of the two analysed reports includes four paramount moves that are similar despite they are from two different disciplines. In addition, the most notably comments assigned by referees' reports are content related defects which are amalgamated with the use of language written.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Richter ◽  
B. A. Brown ◽  
R. Longland ◽  
C. Wrede ◽  
P. Denissenkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 881-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Ngoc Duy ◽  
Phuong-Thao Ho ◽  
Nguyen Kim Uyen
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 305
Author(s):  
S. Athanassopoulos ◽  
E. Mavrommatis ◽  
K. A. Gernoth ◽  
J. W. Clark

We deal with the systematics of one and two proton separation energies as predicted by our latest global model for the masses of nuclides developed with the use of neural networks. Among others, such systematics is useful as input to the astrophysical rp-process and to the one and two proton radioactive studies. Our results are compared with the experimental separation energies referred to in the 2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation and with those evaluated from theoretical models for the masses of nuclides, like the FRDM of Möller et al. and the HFB2 of Pearson et al. We focus in particular on the proton separation energies for nuclides that are involved in the rp-process (29<Z<40) but they have not yet been studied experimentally.


2020 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 01010
Author(s):  
Shigeru Kubono

Binary stellar systems that involve a neutron star or two neutron stars make interesting phenomena, X-ray bursts and kilo-novae, respectively, which involve explosive burning either in the proton-rich environment or in the neutron-rich environment. These are very important problems for nuclear astrophysics. First, the current effort for the explosive hydrogen burning, the rapid proton capture (rp) process which would take place on a neutron star surface in X-ray burst is discussed together with a new X-ray observation that suggests the rp-process termination at around A = 100. The observation of the afterglow of the binary neutron star merger appears to be the kilo-nova predicted in the last decade in nuclear astrophysics, and to be the great success of the field. However, the detailed study of the kilo-nova by the r-process should be a great challenge for full understanding heavy element synthesis and the neutron star merger. Nuclear physics problems are discussed for the kilonova.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document