arthroscopic rotator cuff
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1106
(FIVE YEARS 426)

H-INDEX

66
(FIVE YEARS 8)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Parel ◽  
Valeria Candoli ◽  
Maria Vittoria Filippi ◽  
Antonio Padolino ◽  
Giovanni Merolla ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED Background: The recovery of scapular and gleno-humeral physiological kinematic parameters, as well as sensorimotor control of movement, plays a primary role in the rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A highly customized rehabilitation approach is required to achieve this aim. Biofeedback can be a useful tool but there is poor evidence of its use in the rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. Objective: This article describes an exercise-based program (ISEO-Program) for the recovery of scapular kinematics of patients arthroscopically treated for rotator cuff tear. Methods: The program integrates a conventional rehabilitation program with the use of the ISEO (INAIL Shoulder and Elbow Outpatient protocol), a motion analysis system based on inertial wearable sensors positioned over the thorax, scapula, humerus and forearm. ISEO can return a visual biofeedback of humerus angles over time or of the scapula-humeral coordination, with the possible overlap of patient-specific or asymptomatic subjects’ reference values. Results and conclusions: A set of 12 progressive exercises were defined, divided in four groups based on humerus and scapula movements, each comprising from two to four drills of increasing complexity. Exercises can require the use of ball, stick, rubber band and towels. For each drill, the neuromotor goal and type of visual biofeedback is specified.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110671
Author(s):  
Kotaro Yamakado

UHMWPE suture shows excellent biocompatibility and complication associated with suture debris had not been described before in shoulder surgery. In this study, a case of a 38-year-old man with a wear debris pseudotumor mimicking osteochondromatosis in the subacromial bursa five years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a composite braid suture (a polydioxanone core with a sleeve of UHMWPE) was presented. Histological examination confirmed the presence of suture fragments surrounded with the osteochondral layer without inflammatory reactions. The present study implies the potential risk of free fragmented remnants from the UHMWPE suture. Because of the silent nature of the histological response, a high index of suspicion should be necessary to disclose the chanciness of its use.


Author(s):  
Daniel P. Berthold ◽  
Patrick Garvin ◽  
Michael R. Mancini ◽  
Colin L. Uyeki ◽  
Matthew R. LeVasseur ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Hui Kang ◽  
Hongchuan Li ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Yibin Meng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rotator cuff tear is one of the most common complaint with shoulder pain, disability, or dysfunction. So far, different arthroscopic techniques including single row (SR), double row (DR), modified Mason–Allen (MMA), suture bridge (SB) and transosseous (TO) have been identified to repair rotator cuff. However, no study has reported the comparative efficacy of these 5 suture configurations. The overall aim of this network meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical outcomes and healing rate with arthroscopy among SR, DR, MMA, SB and TO. Methods A systematic literature was searched from PubMed, EBSCO-MEDLINE, Web of Science, google scholar and www.dayi100.com, and checked for the inclusion and exclusion standards. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and SATA 15.0 software. Results Thirty-four studies were eligible for inclusion, including 15 randomized controlled trials, 17 retrospective and 2 prospective cohort studies, with total 3250 shoulders. Two individual reviewers evaluated the quality of the 34 studies, the score form 5 and 9 of 10 were attained according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for the 17 retrospective and 2 prospective studies. There was no significant distinction for the Constant score among 5 groups in the 16 studies with 1381 shoulders. The treatment strategies were ranked as MMA, DR, SB, SR and TO. In ASES score, 14 studies included 1464 shoulders showed that no significant differences was showed among all 5 groups after surgery. Whereas the efficacy probability was TO, MMA, DR, SB and SR according to the cumulative ranking curve. The healing rate in 25 studies include 2023 shoulders was significant in both SR versus DR [risk ratio 0.45 with 95% credible interval (0.31, 0.65)], and SR versus SB [risk ratio 0.45 (95% credible interval 0.29, 0.69)], and no significant in the other comparison, the ranking probability was MMA, SB, DR, TO and SR. Conclusion Based on the clinical results, this network meta-analysis revealed that these 5 suture configurations shows no significant difference. Meanwhile, suture bridge may be the optimum treatment strategy which may improve the healing rate postoperatively, whereas the DR is a suboptimal option for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.


Author(s):  
Nabil Mehta ◽  
Ophelie Z. Lavoie-Gagne ◽  
Matthew R. Cohn ◽  
Joseph Michalski ◽  
Ashlyn Fitch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712110508
Author(s):  
Rony-Orijit Day Hazra ◽  
Justin J. Ernat ◽  
Dylan R. Rakowski ◽  
Robert E. Boykin ◽  
Peter J. Millett

Over the past 30 years, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has evolved to become the gold standard in treating rotator cuff pathology. As procedural concepts of ARCR continue to improve, it is also continually compared with the open rotator cuff repair as the historical standard of care. This review highlights the evolution of ARCR, including a historical perspective; the anatomic, clinical, and surgical implications of the development of an arthroscopic approach; how arthroscopy improved some of the problems of the open approach; adaptations in techniques and technologies associated with ARCR; future perspectives in orthobiologics as they pertain to ARCR; and lastly, the clinical improvements, or lack of improvements, with all of these adaptations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document