reduced fetal movement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-362
Author(s):  
P Pallavee ◽  
Prudvi Rani Podili ◽  
Rupal Samal ◽  
Seetesh Ghose

Fetal movement counting may assist clinicians to intervene at the right time and improve perinatal outcomes, but may sometimes cause unnecessary interventions. A recent Cochrane review in 2015 concludes that there is insufficient evidence to influence practice. This prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate pregnancy outcomes of 103 pregnant women presenting with primary complaints of reduced fetal movements to our Institute. All patients underwent ultrasonography (USG) and non-stress testing (NST) as preliminary investigations and were followed up till delivery. Labor outcomes like onset of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal outcomes like APGAR scores, admission to NICU for > 24 hours, birth weight, neonatal complications and maternal complications were noted. One hundred and three pregnant women presented with reduced fetal movements, of whom, 65% were term primigravida between the ages of 18-26 years. 47.5% belonged to the high risk pregnancy group. The rates of admission (62.1%), induction (77.7%) and cesarean section (43.7%) were high in this group. Pregnancy outcomes did not differ between single and multiple episodes of reduced fetal movements. Based on risk categorization we found that a single episode of reduced fetal movement was associated with approximately 70% good neonatal outcomes, whereas there was 50% risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with multiple episodes. Though this was clinically significant we could not establish statistical significance for this result. Reduced fetal movement can occur in both low and high risk pregnant population. Pregnancy outcomes between single and multiple episodes of RFM were not significantly different.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 101748
Author(s):  
Yoann Athiel ◽  
Emeline Maisonneuve ◽  
Cécile Bléas ◽  
Paul Maurice ◽  
Anne Cortey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nooshin Eshraghi ◽  
AshrafSadat Jamal ◽  
Nasim Eshraghi ◽  
Maryam Kashanian ◽  
Narges Sheikhansari

Author(s):  
Lindsay K Armstrong-Buisseret ◽  
Shonagh Haslam ◽  
Tim James ◽  
Lucy Bradshaw ◽  
Alexander EP Heazell

Background Placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble-fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) are biomarkers of placental function used to aid the diagnosis and prediction of pregnancy complications. This work verified the analytical performance of both biomarkers and provides preliminary diagnostic accuracy data to identify adverse pregnancy outcome in women with reduced fetal movement. Methods Verification of sFlt-1 and PlGF assays included a comparative accuracy assessment of 24 serum samples analysed at six different sites and laboratory-specific precision estimates. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was assessed in serum samples obtained prospectively from 295 women with reduced fetal movement ≥36 weeks’ gestation; diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using 2 × 2 tables and area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. Results Regression analysis showed that performance between sites was good with Passing-Bablok slopes ranging from 0.96 to 1.05 (sFlt-1) and 0.93 to 1.08 (PlGF). All sites had a mean bias <15%, although there was poorer agreement at the lowest PlGF concentrations. All within- and between-batch coefficients of variation were <10%. In 289 women with an appropriately grown fetus, an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≥38 had a sensitivity of 0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.41), specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83, 0.92) and AUROC curve of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47, 0.68) to identify adverse pregnancy outcome. Conclusions Analytical performance of the sFlt-1 and PlGF assays was comparable across different sites. The sensitivity of sFlt-1/PlGF to identify adverse pregnancy outcome in women with reduced fetal movement was considered acceptable, in the absence of other tests, to progress to a pilot randomized controlled trial.


Author(s):  
Mamta Gangwal

Background: A reduced fetal movement is a common indication for assessment of fetal well being. A reduced fetal movement is considered as high risk pregnancy because the fetus is at high risk of hypoxia and sudden demise. Methods: Hospital based prospective study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara. Total 130 pregnant women were included in this study. Results: 10.77% patients didn’t perceive fetal movements after admission. Out of 14 patients with absent DFMC, 6 babies (42.86%) died and 8 babies (57.14%) survived. The association betweenNon Stress Test and mode of delivery was found statistically significant. 83.33%) were admitted in NICU. Out of 24 patients presenting with non reactive NST, 20.83% (5) babies born with APGAR score more than 7 and 79.17% (19) babies had APGAR score 4-7. Conclusion: The association between NST & DFMC and fetal outcome was found statistically significant. Keywords: DFMC, NST, Fetal outcome, survived.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0206533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy E. Higgins ◽  
Jenny E. Myers ◽  
Colin P. Sibley ◽  
Edward D. Johnstone ◽  
Alexander E. P. Heazell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document