double crossovers
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Marco Tulio Mendes Ferreira ◽  
Marek Glombik ◽  
Kateřina Perničková ◽  
Martin Duchoslav ◽  
Olga Scholten ◽  
...  

Abstract Crossing over, in addition to its strictly genetic role, also performs a critical mechanical function, by bonding homologues in meiosis. Hence, it is responsible for an orderly reduction of the chromosome number. As such, it is strictly controlled in frequency and distribution. The well-known crossover control is positive crossover interference which reduces the probability of a crossover in the vicinity of an already formed crossover. A poorly studied aspect of the control is chromatid interference. Such analyses are possible in very few organisms as they require observation of all four products of a single meiosis. Here, we provide direct evidence of chromatid interference. Using in situ probing in two interspecific plant hybrids (Lolium multiflorum×Festuca pratensis and Allium cepa×A. roylei) during anaphase I, we demonstrate that the involvement of four chromatids in double crossovers is significantly more frequent than expected (64% versus 25%). We also provide a physical measure of the crossover interference distance, covering ~30–40% of the relative chromosome arm length, and show that the centromere acts as a barrier for crossover interference. The two arms of a chromosome appear to act as independent units in the process of crossing over. Chromatid interference has to be seriously addressed in genetic mapping approaches and further studies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (6S1) ◽  
pp. 06GL04 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhipeng Ma ◽  
Seongsu Park ◽  
Naoki Yamashita ◽  
Kentaro Kawai ◽  
Yoshikazu Hirai ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asis Khan ◽  
Jahangheer S Shaik ◽  
Michael Behnke ◽  
Qiuling Wang ◽  
Jitender P Dubey ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1587) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne E. McGaugh ◽  
Mohamed A. F. Noor

Chromosomal inversions impact genetic variation and facilitate speciation in part by reducing recombination in heterokaryotypes. We generated multiple whole-genome shotgun sequences of the parapatric species pair Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis and their sympatric outgroup ( Drosophila miranda ) and compared the average pairwise differences for neutral sites within, just outside and far outside of the three large inversions. Divergence between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis is high inside the inversions and in the suppressed recombination regions extending 2.5 Mb outside of inversions, but significantly lower in collinear regions further from the inversions. We observe little evidence of decreased divergence predicted to exist in the centre of inversions, suggesting that gene flow through double crossovers or gene conversion is limited within the inversion, or selection is acting within the inversion to maintain divergence in the face of gene flow. In combination with past studies, we provide evidence that inversions in this system maintain areas of high divergence in the face of hybridization, and have done so for a substantial period of time. The left arm of the X chromosome and chromosome 2 inversions appear to have arisen in the lineage leading to D. persimilis approximately 2 Ma, near the time of the split of D. persimilis–D. pseudoobscura–D. miranda , but likely fixed within D. persimilis much more recently, as diversity within D. persimilis is substantially reduced inside and near these two inversions. We also hypothesize that the inversions in D. persimilis may provide an empirical example of the ‘mixed geographical mode’ theory of inversion origin and fixation, whereby allopatry and secondary contact both play a role.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (15) ◽  
pp. 5297-5299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radha Krishnakumar ◽  
Nacyra Assad-Garcia ◽  
Gwynedd A. Benders ◽  
Quang Phan ◽  
Michael G. Montague ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Most gene knockouts in mycoplasmas are achieved through labor-intensive transposon mutagenesis. Here, we describe a method for making targeted deletions in Mycoplasma pneumoniae by use of homologous recombination. In this method, M. pneumoniae is transformed with a plasmid carrying an antibiotic resistance marker flanked by 1-kb regions surrounding the target gene. Following selection for the antibiotic resistance, colonies are screened for double crossovers which indicate complete deletion of the target open reading frame.


2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lehmensiek ◽  
P. J. Eckermann ◽  
A. P. Verbyla ◽  
R. Appels ◽  
M. W. Sutherland ◽  
...  

Three Australian doubled haploid populations were used to illustrate the importance of map curation in order to improve the quality of linkage maps and quantative trait locus (QTL) detection. The maps were refined and improved by re-examining the order of markers, inspection of the genetic maps in relation to a consensus map, editing the marker data for double crossovers, and determining estimated recombination fractions for all pairs of markers. The re-ordering of markers and replacing genotypes at double crossovers with missing values resulted in an overall decrease in the length of the maps. Fewer apparent genotyping errors, associated with the presence of double recombinants, were identified with restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) than with other types of markers used in this study. The complications that translocations may cause in the ordering of markers and subsequent QTL analysis were investigated. QTL analysis using both the original and revised maps indicated that QTL peaks were more sharply located or had improved log-likelihood (LOD) scores in the revised maps. An accurate indication of the QTL peak and a significant LOD score are both essential for the identification of markers suitable for marker-assisted selection. Recommendations are provided for the improvement of the quality of linkage maps.


Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 1169-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M Meneely ◽  
Anna F Farago ◽  
Tate M Kauffman

Abstract Regulation of both the number and the location of crossovers during meiosis is important for normal chromosome segregation. We used sequence-tagged site polymorphisms to examine the distribution of all crossovers on the X chromosome during oogenesis and on one autosome during both oogenesis and spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. The X chromosome has essentially one crossover during oogenesis, with only three possible double crossover exceptions among 220 recombinant X chromosomes. All three had one of the two crossovers in the same chromosomal interval, suggesting that crossovers in that interval do not cause interference. No other interval was associated with double crossovers. Very high interference was also found on an autosome during oogenesis, implying that each chromosome has only one crossover during oogenesis. During spermatogenesis, recombination on this autosome was reduced by ∼30% compared to oogenesis, but the relative distribution of the residual crossovers was only slightly different. In contrast to previous results with other autosomes, no double crossover chromosomes were observed. Despite an increased frequency of nonrecombinant chromosomes, segregation of a nonrecombinant autosome during spermatogenesis appears to occur normally. This indicates that an achiasmate segregation system helps to ensure faithful disjunction of autosomes during spermatogenesis.


Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 1717-1726
Author(s):  
Donald L Auger ◽  
William F Sheridan

Abstract Negative interference describes a situation where two genetic regions have more double crossovers than would be expected considering the crossover rate of each region. We detected negative crossover interference while attempting to genetically map translocation breakpoints in maize. In an attempt to find precedent examples we determined there was negative interference among previously published translocation breakpoint mapping data in maize. It appears that negative interference was greater when the combined map length of the adjacent regions was smaller. Even positive interference appears to have been reduced when the combined lengths of adjacent regions were below 40 cM. Both phenomena can be explained by a reduction in crossovers near the breakpoints or, more specifically, by a failure of regions near breakpoints to become competent for crossovers. A mathematical explanation is provided.


Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Cáceres ◽  
Antonio Barbadilla ◽  
Alfredo Ruiz

Abstract Most species of the Drosophila genus and other Diptera are polymorphic for paracentric inversions. A common observation is that successful inversions are of intermediate size. We test here the hypothesis that the selected property is the recombination length of inversions, not their physical length. If so, physical length of successful inversions should be negatively correlated with recombination rate across species. This prediction was tested by a comprehensive statistical analysis of inversion size and recombination map length in 12 Diptera species for which appropriate data are available. We found that (1) there is a wide variation in recombination map length among species; (2) physical length of successful inversions varies greatly among species and is inversely correlated with the species recombination map length; and (3) neither the among-species variation in inversion length nor the correlation are observed in unsuccessful inversions. The clear differences between successful and unsuccessful inversions point to natural selection as the most likely explanation for our results. Presumably the selective advantage of an inversion increases with its length, but so does its detrimental effect on fertility due to double crossovers. Our analysis provides the strongest and most extensive evidence in favor of the notion that the adaptive value of inversions stems from their effect on recombination.


Genomics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vickie L. Jarrell ◽  
Harris A. Lewin ◽  
Yang Da ◽  
Matthew B. Wheeler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document