crop residue decomposition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 107823
Author(s):  
Resham Thapa ◽  
Katherine L. Tully ◽  
Chris Reberg-Horton ◽  
Miguel Cabrera ◽  
Brian W. Davis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3039-3059
Author(s):  
Cyrine REZGUI ◽  
Isabelle TRINSOUTROT-GATTIN ◽  
Marie BENOIT ◽  
Karine LAVAL ◽  
Wassila RIAH-ANGLET

2021 ◽  
Vol 320 ◽  
pp. 107609
Author(s):  
Sam J. Leuthold ◽  
Dan Quinn ◽  
Fernando Miguez ◽  
Ole Wendroth ◽  
Monsterrat Salmerón ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Adriele Tassinari ◽  
Lincon Oliveira Stefanello da Silva ◽  
Gerson Laerson Drescher ◽  
Rodolfo Assis de Oliveira ◽  
Elena Baldi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
Boris Alexandrovich Sotnikov ◽  
Vladimir Alexandrovich Kravchenko ◽  
Roman Viktorovich Shchuchka

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed Gregorich ◽  
Mike Beare ◽  
Denis Curtin ◽  
Henry Janzen ◽  
Ben Ellert ◽  
...  

<p>Crop residues are an important resource for maintaining soil productivity. The decay of crop residues is linked to many ecosystem functions, affecting atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, nutrient release, microbial diversity, and soil organic matter quality. The rate of decay, in turn, is regulated by soil type, management, and environmental variables, some of which will be changing in the future. Our objective in this study was to evaluate effects of soil type, climate, residue placement on the decomposition and retention of residue-derived C. <sup>13</sup>C-labelled barley straw was either placed at the surface or mixed to 10 cm in soils at four sites in Canada and one site in New Zealand representing different soil types and climates. Soils were collected periodically over 10 yr to determine <sup>13</sup>C remaining. The loss of C from crop residues occurred quickly, most (70-75%) within the first 2 yrs but with only 5-10% remaining after 10 yrs. There were large losses of C from the mixed treatments within the first year, with 20-50% lost after 6 months over winter and 50-70 % lost after one year; after that decomposition slowed. Temperature was the single most important factor regulating the rate of residue decay. Thermal time, expressed as cumulative degree days, explained more of the variability in residue C recovered than time (in calendar years). Slower decay of surface-placed residues may be attributed to lower mean annual precipitation at those sites. Thermal time is a robust, consistent way of predicting crop residue decay rates (or C storage) for comparing C kinetics across sites with different soils and climates.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Crusciol ◽  
João Rigon ◽  
Juliano Calonego ◽  
Rogério Soratto

Some crop species could be used inside a cropping system as part of a strategy to increase soil P availability due to their capacity to recycle P and shift the equilibrium between soil P fractions to benefit the main crop. The release of P by crop residue decomposition, and mobilization and uptake of otherwise recalcitrant P are important mechanisms capable of increasing P availability and crop yields.


2019 ◽  
Vol 436 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 413-426
Author(s):  
Qiao Xu ◽  
James B. O’Sullivan ◽  
Xiaojuan Wang ◽  
Caixian Tang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document