A Prospective Phase 2 Study Testing High Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide As Sole Ghvd Prophylaxis after Matched Allotransplant Using Baltimore-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens and PBSC As Source of Graft

Introduction: The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) has revolutionized graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and allowed to successfully reconsider haplotransplant in recent years. As this strategy significantly reduces the incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD, PTCY has been thereafter considered not only in matched settings but also as sole GVHD prophylaxis, at least when considering myeloablative allotransplant using matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donors and bone marrow as source of graft. Here, PTCY, as a sole GVHD prophylaxis, was tested in a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) setting, using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as source of graft considering that this platform is currently broadly used worldwide in adults. Methods: This prospective monocentric phase 2 study was designed with the main objective to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using only PTCY (without cyclosporine A nor mycophenolate mofetyl after transplant) in adults (18-70 years old) eligible for a RIC PBSC transplant with MSD or MUD. The Baltimore platform with 2 days of PTCY 50mg/kg/day on days 3 and 4 post infusion was considered as conditioning regimen, using fludarabine for lymphoid disease or clofarabine for myeloid disease. The primary objective was to appreciate the incidence of corticosteroid-resistant acute grade 3-4 GVHD (CR 3-4 GVHD) within 100 days post-transplant. According to statistical rules, patients have to be included in a step by step fashion (3, 3, 6, 15, 15 and 17 patients) for a total of 59 evaluable patients (meaning having received PTCY), in order to stop the protocol soon enough in case of excessive rate of deleterious severe acute GVHD (graded according to Mount Sinai International Consortium). Thus, the trial had to be stopped in case of documentation of > 2 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 3 patients, >3 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 6 patients, > 4 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 12 patients, > 6 3-4 CR GVHD for the first 27 patients, > 8 CR 3-4 GVHD for the first 42 patients and finally as soon as > 9 CR 3-4 GVHD for the last included patients. All patients gave informed consent. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263767. Results: The results of the first 27 first patients (males n=17 and female n=10; median age: 59 years old (yo), range: 26-70) are reported here. They were included between February 2018 and November 2020. Diagnoses were AML (N=8), MDS (N=5), CMML (N=2), myelofibrosis (N=5), CML (N=1), DLBCL (N=1), T-cell lymphoma (N=1), Philadelphia positive B-ALL (N=1), CLL (N=1), lymphoblastic lymphoma (N=1) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (N=1). Donors were MSD in 10 cases and MUD in 17. Only one primary graft failure was documented in a 61 yo MDS patient with active disease at transplant. He is however still alive in response after autologous reconstitution. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 10-42) for alive patients at the time of analysis (July 2021), 1-year and 2-year survivals were 80.9+7% and 74.7+9%, respectively, for both OS et DFS. GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year and 2-year was 58.7+9% and 52.2+10%, respectively. Three relapses (11%) and 6 deaths occurred. Deaths were due to acute GVHD in 4 patients (including 1 with sepsis and 1 with SARS-COVID 19 infection) and relapse in 2. Grade 2, 3 and 4 acute GVHD occurred in 11, 1 and 4 patients, respectively, for a total of 59% of grade 2-4 acute GVHD. CR 3-4 GVHD was observed in all of 5 patients with acute grade 3-4 GVHD and 4 died related to GVHD. Moderate/severe chronic GVHD occurred in 5/22 (22.7%) evaluable patients, including 4 still on immunosuppressive therapy at 40, 28, 25 and 16 months post-transplant. Overall non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 14.8% and related to acute GVHD. However, the number of cases conducting to stop the protocol was not reached. Conclusion: PTCY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis is here demonstrated as possible and relatively safe for adults receiving a matched PBSC Baltimore-based RIC allograft. The very good survivals reported here may be related to a strong GVL effect associated with the high incidence of acute GVHD. However, because of this high incidence and the fact that NRM was related to GVHD after this first analysis, we have now made an amendment to test the addition to PTCY of one day of anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) 2.5 mg/kg on day-2 for the next 32 patients to be included. This second cohort receiving PTCY+ATG as a sole prophylaxis is ongoing. Disclosures Moreau: Celgene BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria.

Prognostic Impacts of Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities Acquired at the First Relapse in Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Second Complete Remission

Background: Additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACA), the most frequent form of cytogenetic changes, are considered as a result of genetic instability and clonal evolution of leukemia cells. Recently, we described that ACA at the first relapse was associated with the significantly lower second complete remission (CR2) rate and poor survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36:252-257). However, the prognostic impact of ACA after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) has not been elucidated in adult AML patients. Patients and methods: Of the 145 adult AML patients who underwent the first allo-SCT in CR2 between 1997 and 2019, 98 patients whose cytogenetic abnormality data both at diagnosis and at the first relapse were available were included in this study. Cytogenetic changes between at diagnosis and the first relapse were classified into four groups: (1) no change, (2) ACA was acquired at the first relapse, (3) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared at the first relapse, and (4) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared, and completely different ACA was acquired at the first relapse. In this study, groups 2 and 4 were defined as ACA acquisition. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the date of transplant to the date of death. Fisher's exact test was used to compare binary variables. The cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were evaluated with Gray's test, considering relapse and NRM as a competing risk, respectively. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with at least borderline significance (p < 0.20) in univariate analyses were subjected to multivariate analysis. The Cox and Fine-Gray proportional hazard model were used for multivariate analysis of prognostic and risk factors, respectively. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Of the 98 patients included in this study, 57 were male, and 41 were female. The median age at transplant was 45 years (range, 17-71 years). The median duration of CR1 was 12.4 months (range, 1.3-70.3 months) and cytogenetic risk groups were good, intermediate, and poor in 26 (27%), 70 (71%), and two patients (2%), respectively. Donor types were related, unrelated, and cord blood in 23 (24%), 59 (60%), and 16 patients (16%), respectively, and 86 (87%) and 61 patients (62%) were conditioned with myeloablative and total body irradiation-containing regimens, respectively. According to the definition described above, 20 patients (20%) acquired ACA at the first relapse. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and transplant procedures between patients with and without ACA acquisition. The OS rates were not significantly different between two groups (55% vs. 72% at three years after transplant; p = 0.28). The CI of relapse was significantly higher in patients with ACA acquisition than those without ACA acquisition (59% vs. 15%; p < 0.01), while the CI of NRM were not significantly different between two groups (5% vs. 19%; p = 0.17). Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that age over 50 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4; p < 0.01), but not ACA acquisition, was identified as an independent prognostic factor. ACA acquisition (HR = 4.7; p < 0.01) was extracted as an independent risk factor of relapse, while use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (HR = 3.1; p = 0.03) and more than or equal to 1 of performance status at transplant (HR = 2.7; p = 0.04) showed independent risks of NRM. The similar OS rates between two groups might resulted from an offset of the lower relapse rate with the higher NRM rate in patients without ACA acquisition despite not reaching statistical significance. This increasing NRM rates in those without ACA acquisition was potentially associated with use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens in larger proportion (0% vs. 15%; p = 0.12). Conclusion: These findings suggested that ACA acquisition at the first relapse was associated with a higher risk of relapse even after allo-SCT in CR2 in adult AML patients. As AML cells with ACA acquisition was resistant to not only chemotherapy but also graft-versus-leukemia effect, innovative therapeutic strategy is warranted. Disclosures Handa: Janssen: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Chugai: Research Funding; Ono: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Shionogi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding.