scholarly journals Interpersonal and Group Contingencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-135
Author(s):  
Tom Cariveau ◽  
Colin S. Muething ◽  
Whitney Trapp
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea A. Theodore ◽  
Annmarie Lynch ◽  
Melissa A. Bray ◽  
Thomas J. Kehle

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 61-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Skinner ◽  
Craig S. Cashwell ◽  
Merrily S. Dunn

Author(s):  
Tai A. Collins ◽  
Renee O. Hawkins ◽  
Kamonta Heidelburg ◽  
Keisha Hill

Group contingencies describe interventions in which a reward is delivered to a group of individuals based on meeting a predetermined target level of performance. Group contingencies have repeatedly been found to be effective in modifying student behavior. Not only are group contingences effective, but they also have several logistical advantages over individual contingencies. Namely, the delivery of a common consequence to a group of individuals increases efficiency, the use of peers as change agents increases positive peer pressure for appropriate behavior, group contingencies are flexible, and they allow access to a variety of reinforcers. Three different types of group contingencies are described. Finally, specific examples of group contingencies are provided. This includes the Good Behavior Game, Positive Peer Reporting, and Mystery Motivator.


Author(s):  
Tom Cariveau

Group contingencies include the arrangement of a common consequence for responding by members of a group. Independent group contingencies involve a common consequence being delivered to an individual student based on her performance. Dependent group contingencies involve the consequence being delivered to the entire group based on the performance of an individual or small group of students. Numerous variables may be altered in a group contingency and arranging an effective intervention requires planful incorporation of each. This chapter reviews the components of independent and dependent group contingencies and considerations when designing and implementing group contingencies in educational settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Parks Ennis

Group contingencies are effective classroom-based interventions that can be used to increase the academic engagement of students with disabilities. This article defines and outlines examples of dependent, independent, and interdependent group contingencies. In addition, tips for success, including making reinforcement accessible to students, pairing reinforcement with behavior-specific praise, integrating self-monitoring, and providing a visual display of progress toward reinforcement, are discussed. Strategies for preventing challenges to implementation are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document