Neurotoxic effect of nalufin on the histology, ultrastructure, cell cycle and apoptosis of the developing chick embryo and its amelioration by selenium

2021 ◽  
pp. 112693
Author(s):  
Marwa N. Atallah ◽  
Gamal M. Badawy ◽  
Islam M. El–Garawani ◽  
Fatma S. Abdallah ◽  
Hend T. El–Borm
2004 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Alisi ◽  
S. Spagnuolo ◽  
S. Napoletano ◽  
A. Spaziani ◽  
S. Leoni

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.W. van Straaten ◽  
J.W. Hekking ◽  
J.P. Beursgens ◽  
E. Terwindt-Rouwenhorst ◽  
J. Drukker

After implantation of a notochord fragment lateral to the neural tube in a 2-day chick embryo, at 4 days the ipsilateral neural tube half was increased in size and axons left the neural tube in a broad dorsoventral area (van Straaten et al. 1985). This enlargement appears to coincide with an increased area of AChE-positive basal plate neuroblasts, as determined with scan-cytophotometry. The effect was ipsilateral and local: clear effects were seen only when the implant was localized less than 80 microns from the neural tube and over 120 microns from the ventral notochord. In order to investigate the expected enhancement of proliferation, the mitotic density and the number of cells at the site of the implant at 3 days was determined and the mitotic index calculated. All three parameters showed an increase. It was concluded that the cell cycle was shorter in the implant area relative to the control area, at least during the third day. At 4 days the number of cells was still increased, predominantly in the basal plate. It appeared that the numerical increase was for the larger part due to neuroblasts. The synergism of two notochords thus resulted in enhancement of proliferation and differentiation in the neural tube. It is suggested that the notochord merely regulates and arranges the surrounding sclerenchymal cells, which are the effective cells in the regulation of neural tube development.


1971 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. van Steenis ◽  
M.J. van Logten

Nature ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 273 (5657) ◽  
pp. 50-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
JORDI DOMINGO ◽  
JOAN SERRATOSA ◽  
CONXITA VIDAL ◽  
EULALIA RIUS

Cytometry ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Giaretti ◽  
S. Bruno ◽  
A. DiVinci ◽  
E. Geido ◽  
G. Moro ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Robert Minkoff

Cell cycle parameters were analysed in mesenchyme of the maxillary process and the roof of the stomodeum in the chick embryo from stages 19 through 28. The generation times at stages 24–26 were determined by pulse labelling of embryos with [3H]thymidine, followed by labelled mitosis counts and construction and analysis of percent-labelled mitosis curves employing computer-assisted curve-fitting techniques. The median generation time was approximately 10·6 h in the maxillary process, and 16 h in the roof of the stomodeum; corresponding values for mean generation times were approximately 12·0 and 18·2 h, respectively. Median values for transit times of G1, S, and G2 were 2·0, 5·4, and 2·5 h in the maxillary process and 5·2, 6·7, and 2·7 h in the roof of the stomodeum. The distribution of generation times of cells in the roof of the stomodeum, however, appeared to be more heterogeneous than those of cells in the maxillary process. The percentage of cells which continue to cycle rapidly (i.e. the ‘growth fraction’) was determined by repeated-labelling experiments with [3H]thymidine in chick embryos from stages 19 through 28. Cumulative labelling of mesenchymal cells in both the maxillary process and roof of the stomodeum approached 100 % at stage 19 but dropped markedly from stage 19 to 25 declining to approximately 60–70 % in the maxillary process, and to 30 % in the roof of the stomodeum. The decline in cell proliferation rates for these regions, determined in previous studies with labelling indices, appears to be a result of the removal of cells from rapidly cycling cell populations into subpopulations which are cycling more slowly and possibly into subpopulations which have become quiescent; the difference in growth rates between these regions could be attributed to the time of appearance and the size of these emerging slow cycling or quiescent subpopulations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovannella Bruscalupi ◽  
Mara Massimi ◽  
Silvana Spagnuolo ◽  
Anna Maria Fiore ◽  
Silvia Leoni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document