Interdependent Group Contingencies

Author(s):  
Daniel M. Maggin ◽  
Christerallyn A. J. Brown ◽  
Skip Kumm

Interdependent group contingencies involve a common consequence based on the behavior of all members of the group, as groups may have to meet a behavioral criterion together or all group members must meet a criterion to access a consequence. Interventions such as the Good Behavior Game, Peer Reporting Interventions, and mystery motivators are examples of interdependent group contingencies that utilize peer influence to improve appropriate behaviors in classrooms. This chapter discusses implementation issues with group contingencies, including target behavior selection, classroom training, addressing group sabotage, and managing contingencies. This chapter also discusses considerations of diversity and equity within interdependent group contingencies.

Author(s):  
Tai A. Collins ◽  
Renee O. Hawkins ◽  
Kamonta Heidelburg ◽  
Keisha Hill

Group contingencies describe interventions in which a reward is delivered to a group of individuals based on meeting a predetermined target level of performance. Group contingencies have repeatedly been found to be effective in modifying student behavior. Not only are group contingences effective, but they also have several logistical advantages over individual contingencies. Namely, the delivery of a common consequence to a group of individuals increases efficiency, the use of peers as change agents increases positive peer pressure for appropriate behavior, group contingencies are flexible, and they allow access to a variety of reinforcers. Three different types of group contingencies are described. Finally, specific examples of group contingencies are provided. This includes the Good Behavior Game, Positive Peer Reporting, and Mystery Motivator.


1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 61-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Skinner ◽  
Craig S. Cashwell ◽  
Merrily S. Dunn

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Parks Ennis

Group contingencies are effective classroom-based interventions that can be used to increase the academic engagement of students with disabilities. This article defines and outlines examples of dependent, independent, and interdependent group contingencies. In addition, tips for success, including making reinforcement accessible to students, pairing reinforcement with behavior-specific praise, integrating self-monitoring, and providing a visual display of progress toward reinforcement, are discussed. Strategies for preventing challenges to implementation are also discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Reinhardt ◽  
Lea A. Theodore ◽  
Melissa A. Bray ◽  
Thomas J. Kehle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document