scholarly journals Efficacy of additional periprostatic apex nerve block on pain in each of 12 transrectal prostate core biopsies: a retrospective study

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Yoo ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
Byung Ha Chung ◽  
Kwang Suk Lee
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Probe Insertion

Abstract Background We identified pain variation according to prostate biopsy sites and compared differences in pain relief according to the site of periprostatic nerve block (PNB). Methods This retrospective study collected data from 312 patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsies between January 2019 and August 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the site of local anesthesia (base vs. base and apex PNB), with each block achieved with 2.5 cm3 of 2% lidocaine. Pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at the following time points: probe insertion, PNB at base, PNB at apex, each of the 12 core biopsy sites, and 15 min after biopsy. The results were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results The average pain scores were significantly higher in the base-only PNB group than were those in the base and apex PNB group (3.88 vs 2.82, p < 0.001). In the base-only PNB group, the pain scores increased from base to apex (p < 0.001), and the pain at each site also gradually increased as the biopsy proceeded (p < 0.001). In contrast, in the base and apex PNB group, there was minor change in pain scores throughout the procedure. Conclusions The pain scores varied at each site during the prostate biopsy. The provision of a base and apex PNB provided greater pain relief than does base-only PNB during prostate biopsy.

scholarly journals Pain control according to the periprostatic nerve block site in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal targeted prostate biopsy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Yoo ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
Byung Ha Chung ◽  
Kwang Suk Lee
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Probe Insertion ◽  
Site Pain ◽  
Periprostatic Nerve Block

AbstractWe analyzed the intensity of pain at each site of systemic prostate biopsy (SBx) and compared the intensity of pain among magnetic resonance (MRI)-targeted transrectal biopsies according to the periprostatic nerve block (PNB) site. We collected data from 229 consecutive patients who had undergone MRI-targeted biopsy. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the site of PNB (base versus base and apex PNB). Pain was quantified at the following time points: probe insertion, injection at the prostate base, injection at the prostate apex, MRI cognitive biopsy (CBx), MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FBx), SBx, and 15 min after biopsy. For all biopsy methods, the average pain were significantly higher in the base PNB group than in the base and apex PNB group (CBx, p < 0.001; FBx, p = 0.015; SBx, p < 0.001). In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was significantly more painful than SBx (p = 0.024). Overall, regardless of the PNB site, pain at the anterior sites was more than that at the posterior sites in FBx (p = 0.039). Base and apex PNB provided better overall pain control than base-only PNB in all biopsy methods. In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was more painful than CBx and SBx.

scholarly journals Pain control according to the periprostatic nerve block site in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal targeted prostate biopsy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Yoo ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
Byung Ha Chung ◽  
Kwang Suk Lee
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Probe Insertion ◽  
Site Pain ◽  
Periprostatic Nerve Block

Abstract INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the intensity of pain at each site of systemic prostate biopsy (SBx) and compared the intensity of pain among magnetic resonance (MRI)-targeted transrectal biopsies according to the periprostatic nerve block (PNB) site.METHODSWe collected data from 229 consecutive patients who had undergone MRI-targeted biopsy. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the site of PNB (base versus base and apex PNB). Pain was quantified at the following time points: probe insertion, injection at the prostate base, injection at the prostate apex, MRI cognitive biopsy (CBx), MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FBx), SBx, and 15 minutes after biopsy.RESULTSFor all biopsy methods, the average pain were significantly higher in the base PNB group than in the base and apex PNB group (CBx, p < 0.001; FBx, p = 0.015; SBx, p < 0.001). In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was significantly more painful than SBx (p = 0.024). Overall, regardless of the PNB site, pain at the anterior sites was more than that at the posterior sites in FBx (p = 0.039).CONCLUSIONSBase and apex PNB provided better overall pain control than base-only PNB in all biopsy methods. In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was more painful than CBx and SBx.

A Three-arm Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Continuous Femoral Plus Single-injection Sciatic Peripheral Nerve Blocks versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam W. Amundson ◽  
Rebecca L. Johnson ◽  
Matthew P. Abdel ◽  
Carlos B. Mantilla ◽  
Jason K. Panchamia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Multimodal analgesia is standard practice for total knee arthroplasty; however, the role of regional techniques in improved perioperative outcomes remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that peripheral nerve blockade would result in lower pain scores and opioid consumption than two competing periarticular injection solutions. Methods This three-arm, nonblinded trial randomized 165 adults undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty to receive (1) femoral catheter plus sciatic nerve blocks, (2) ropivacaine-based periarticular injection, or (3) liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection. Primary outcome was maximal pain during postoperative day 1 (0 to 10, numerical pain rating scale) in intention-to-treat analysis. Additional outcomes included pain scores and opioid consumption for postoperative days 0 to 2 and 3 months. Results One hundred fifty-seven study patients received peripheral nerve block (n = 50), ropivacaine (n = 55), or liposomal bupivacaine (n = 52) and reported median maximal pain scores on postoperative day 1 of 3, 4, and 4.5 and on postoperative day 0 of 1, 4, and 5, respectively (average pain scores for postoperative day 0: 0.6, 1.7, and 2.4 and postoperative day 1: 2.5, 3.5, and 3.7). Postoperative day 1 median maximal pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve blockade compared to liposomal bupivacaine-based periarticular injection (P = 0.016; Hodges–Lehmann median difference [95% CI] = −1 [−2 to 0]). After postanesthesia care unit discharge, postoperative day 0 median maximal and average pain scores were significantly lower for peripheral nerve block compared to both periarticular injections (ropivacaine: maximal −2 [−3 to −1]; P &lt; 0.001; average −0.8 [−1.3 to −0.2]; P = 0.003; and liposomal bupivacaine: maximal −3 [−4 to −2]; P &lt; 0.001; average −1.4 [−2.0 to −0.8]; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Ropivacaine-based periarticular injections provide pain control comparable on postoperative days 1 and 2 to a femoral catheter and single-injection sciatic nerve block. This study did not demonstrate an advantage of liposomal bupivacaine over ropivacaine in periarticular injections for total knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals The Long Term Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve Blocks for Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Study

2018 ◽  
pp. 75-77
Author(s):  
Laura Anne Lynem
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Chronic Knee Pain ◽  
Post Procedure

Chronic knee pain is a leading cause of chronic disability and its symptoms have a profound impact on the lives of those suffering from it. Current treatment modalities for chronic knee pain include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Genicular nerve blocks are a new therapeutic alternative that have been shown to relieve chronic knee pain and may provide significant relief in patients who are either poor surgical candidates or are unwilling to accept the risks associated with surgery. Genicular nerve blocks may provide long term pain relief for chronic knee pain and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may not be necessary. This Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective study conducted at a single center university hospital involved 44 patients aged 43 to 87 who received genicular nerve blocks for chronic knee pain. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if genicular nerve blocks provide effective long term pain relief for patients with chronic knee pain. The numeric rating scale was used to measure the patient’s knee pain at baseline, 30, 90, and 120 days post procedure. Patients experienced a mean pain level of 7.43 out of 10 before the genicular nerve block and 4.02 afterward representing an average improvement of 42.6% in pain relief overall post procedure follow-up. A t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the mean pain score before and after the blocks (t = 8.534, P < 0.01). Overall, the patients experienced significant pain relief of an average of 111.9 days resulting in an average of 42.6 percent pain relief post procedure follow-up. Out of the 44 patients, 15 (34.1%) underwent a RFA after receiving a genicular nerve block procedure to further manage their chronic knee pain symptoms. In conclusion, we have found statistically significant evidence that genicular nerve blocks provide effective long-term pain relief for patients with chronic knee pain. Therefore, for patients who are not surgical candidates, genicular nerve blocks represent a viable alternative treatment for knee pain. Key words: Genicular nerve blocks, chronic knee pain, genicular nerves, genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

scholarly journals Evaluation of the efficacy of a combination of diltiazem and periprostatic nerve block in pain control during transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Jindal ◽  
SN Mandal ◽  
G Biswas ◽  
D Karmakar
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Dual Origin ◽  
Probe Insertion ◽  
Periprostatic Nerve Block

Introduction The choice of analgesia during prostate biopsy remains controversial. The pain has dual origin: from the insertion of the probe as well as the biopsy itself. Periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) is currently the gold standard modality for decreasing pain of prostate biopsy but it does not alleviate the pain of probe insertion. A randomised controlled trial was performed to test the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical application of diltiazem gel and PPNB for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy. Methods A total of 73 patients who were to undergo their first prostate biopsy were randomised to receive either 2ml of 2% topical diltiazem gel or a placebo 15 minutes before the biopsy. All the patients then had a PPNB using 1% lignocaine. A ten-point visual analogue scale was used to record the pain immediately after the insertion of the probe and during the biopsy. Any adverse effects were also recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the mean age and prostate volumes between the groups. There was a significantly lower mean pain score due to probe insertion in those patients who received topical diltiazem than in the placebo group (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the pain scores during the biopsy itself between the two groups. Conclusions Topical diltiazem significantly reduces the pain of probe insertion during prostate biopsy and can be used effectively as an adjuvant to PPNB.

scholarly journals Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Articular Sensory Branches of the Obturator and Femoral Nerves using Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound Guidance: A Large Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. E611-E617
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Average Decrease ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Radiofrequency Denervation ◽  
Large Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: We previously reported on a combined technique and initial data of hip denervation using an anterior approach and cooled radiofrequency. OBJECTIVES: A large retrospective study to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) in the general chronic hip pain population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective electronic chart review. SETTING: A single specialty private practice. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 235 consecutive (CRFA) in 136 patients with chronic hip pain. RESULTS: Out of 235 CRFA, 178 (96 initial procedures and 82 repeats) were performed in 84 patients with 12 or more months follow-up. The average decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores was 7.3 ± 1.3 to 2.3 ± 1.5 and 2.48 ± 1.5 for the first and second diagnostic block, respectively, and was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Similarly, the average decrease in VAS pain scores at 6 and 12 months after CRFA denervation was 3.44 ± 2.5 and 4.23 ± 2.5, respectively; P < 0.001. Out of the 96 initial procedures in 84 patients, 66 procedures (69%) provided more than 50% relief at 6 months, and 50 (52%) at 12 months. There were 82 repeat denervations in 36 patients. Repeated procedures in the same patients provided a similar degree of pain relief with no statistically significant difference in the median pain scores (2.8 ± 2.1 cm vs 3.1 ± 1.7 cm ; P = 0.197) or time interval of pain relief (12.7 ± 10.9 vs 10.3 ± 4.7; P = 0.508). There were 3 minor complications. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: Improvements in pain scores and longevity of pain relief from chronic hip pain using a simple, anterior approach to radiofrequency denervation of the lateral obturator and lateral femoral nerves justifies further randomized prospective trials. Repeated CRFAs demonstrated consistency in pain relief and absolute safety of repeated denervation. KEY WORDS: Hip denervation, degenerative joint disease, chronic hip pain, radiofrequency denervation, lateral obturator nerve, lateral femoral nerve

scholarly journals The relative analgesic value of a femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff C. Gadsden ◽  
Siddharth Sata ◽  
W. Michael. Bullock ◽  
Amanda H. Kumar ◽  
Stuart A. Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Adductor Canal Block ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Total Knee

Background: Multiple comparative studies report that adductor canal blocks provide similar pain relief to femoral nerve blocks following total knee arthroplasty. However, adductor canal blockade fails to anesthetize several important femoral nerve branches that contribute to knee innervation. We sought to clarify this anatomic discrepancy by performing both blocks in sequence, using patients as their own controls. We hypothesized that patients would experience additional pain relief following a superimposed femoral nerve block, demonstrating that these techniques are not equivalent.Methods: Sixteen patients received continuous adductor canal block before undergoing knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia. In the recovery room, patients reported their pain score on a numeric scale of 0–10. Once a patient reached a score of five or greater, he/she was randomized to receive an additional femoral nerve block using 2% chloroprocaine or saline sham, and pain scores recorded every 5 min for 30 min. Patients received opioid rescue as needed. Anesthesiologists performing and assessing block efficacy were blinded to group allocation.Results: Patients randomized to chloroprocaine versus saline reported significantly improved median pain scores 30 min after the femoral block (2.0 vs. 5.5, P = 0.0001). Patients receiving chloroprocaine also required significantly fewer morphine equivalents during the 30 min post-femoral block (1.0 vs. 4.5 mg, P = 0.03).Conclusions: Adductor canal block is a useful technique for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty, but it does not provide equivalent analgesic efficacy to femoral nerve block. Future studies comparing efficacy between various block sites along the thigh are warranted.

Analyzing discontinuities in longitudinal count data: A multilevel generalized linear mixed model.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Peugh ◽  
Sarah J. Beal ◽  
Meghan E. McGrady ◽  
Michael D. Toland ◽  
Constance Mara
Keyword(s):  
Count Data ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Generalized Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Longitudinal Count Data

Predicting bycatch hotspots based on suitable habitat derived from fishery-independent data

2020 ◽  
Vol 641 ◽  
pp. 159-175
Author(s):  
J Runnebaum ◽  
KR Tanaka ◽  
L Guan ◽  
J Cao ◽  
L O’Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Suitability ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Gulf Of Maine ◽  
Homarus Americanus ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
American Lobster ◽  
Suitable Habitat ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Suitability Index

Bycatch remains a global problem in managing sustainable fisheries. A critical aspect of management is understanding the timing and spatial extent of bycatch. Fisheries management often relies on observed bycatch data, which are not always available due to a lack of reporting or observer coverage. Alternatively, analyzing the overlap in suitable habitat for the target and non-target species can provide a spatial management tool to understand where bycatch interactions are likely to occur. Potential bycatch hotspots based on suitable habitat were predicted for cusk Brosme brosme incidentally caught in the Gulf of Maine American lobster Homarus americanus fishery. Data from multiple fisheries-independent surveys were combined in a delta-generalized linear mixed model to generate spatially explicit density estimates for use in an independent habitat suitability index. The habitat suitability indices for American lobster and cusk were then compared to predict potential bycatch hotspot locations. Suitable habitat for American lobster has increased between 1980 and 2013 while suitable habitat for cusk decreased throughout most of the Gulf of Maine, except for Georges Basin and the Great South Channel. The proportion of overlap in suitable habitat varied interannually but decreased slightly in the spring and remained relatively stable in the fall over the time series. As Gulf of Maine temperatures continue to increase, the interactions between American lobster and cusk are predicted to decline as cusk habitat continues to constrict. This framework can contribute to fisheries managers’ understanding of changes in habitat overlap as climate conditions continue to change and alter where bycatch interactions could occur.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document