nerve blocks
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2740
(FIVE YEARS 737)

H-INDEX

69
(FIVE YEARS 8)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Lee ◽  
Chau M. Pham ◽  
Randy H. Kardon ◽  
Erin M. Shriver

Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Yu Cui ◽  
Rong Cao ◽  
Qing-Hua Huang ◽  
Qian-Qian Zhang

Animals ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Hanneke Hermans ◽  
Ralph A. Lloyd-Edwards ◽  
Aukje J. H. Ferrão-van Sommeren ◽  
Anne A. Tersmette ◽  
Jacobine C. M. Schouten ◽  
...  

In standing ophthalmic surgery in horses, a retrobulbar nerve block (RNB) is often placed blindly for anesthesia and akinesia. The ultrasound (US)-guided RNB may have fewer complications, but the two techniques have only been compared once in equine cadavers. This study compares the techniques for success and complication rates and analyzes the effect of training on US guidance. Twenty-two equine cadavers were divided into three groups: blind RNBs were performed bilaterally in eight cadavers, US-guided RNBs were performed bilaterally in seven cadavers, and after US-guided training, blind RNBs were performed bilaterally in seven cadavers. All RNBs were performed by the same two inexperienced operators, and a combination of contrast medium (CM; 1.25 mL) and methylene blue dye (1.25 mL) were injected (2.5 mL total volume). Needle positioning in the periorbita and the distance of the CM to the optic foramen were assessed using computerized tomography (CT). Dye spreading was evaluated by dissection. In group 1, 37.5% of the injections were in the optimal central position in the periorbita; in group 2, 75% and in group 3, 71.4%. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding needle position (groups 1 and 2 p = 0.056; groups 1 and 3 p = 0.069, groups 2 and 3 p = 0.8). The mean CM distribution distance was not significantly different between all groups. Group 1 had 18.75% intraocular injections versus 0% in group 2 and 7.1% in group 3 (not significant). US guidance showed no significant increases in accuracy nor decreases in complications. However, the effects on accuracy showed a trend towards significant improvement, and larger scale follow-up studies might show significant training effects on US guidance.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao He ◽  
◽  
Zhaoqiong Zhu ◽  
Min Jiang ◽  
Xingxing Liu ◽  
...  

Review question / Objective: Patientor population: patients with emergence delirium; Exposure: anaesthesia and surgery; Control: patients with no emergence delirium; Outcome: risk factors; Study design: meta-analysis. Eligibility criteria: To ensure the quality of this meta-analysis, inclusion criteria was decided before we carried out the search. These criteria were: (a) Original researches that carried out in observational studies. (b)Adult patients who were extubated and recovered at PACU, operation room, or intensive care unit (ICU) after surgeries and anesthesia (including general and neuraxial anesthesia, peripheral nerve blocks and sedation). (c) Risk factors for delirium must be assessed with odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Researches must present the results of multivariate regression to be considered eligible for inclusion, since multivariate analysis results shall be used to identify variables eligible for meta-analysis. (d) Full-text available literatures.


2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Tuhin Mistry ◽  
Harshraj Bhendale ◽  
Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian ◽  
Kartik Sonawane

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e001370
Author(s):  
Joseph Christopher Arbizo ◽  
Kajal Dalal ◽  
Veronia Lao ◽  
Frank Rosinia ◽  
Temiloluwa Adejuyigbe

BackgroundProcedural time-outs and checklists are proven to be an effective means of improving teamwork and preventing wrong-sided procedures. The main objective of this study was to ensure that all regional nerve blocks being performed in the preoperative area at our hospital were executed with a proper time-out. The goal of this project was to increase integration of a safe preoperative block process including a time-out checklist to ensure; complete consents, correct patient and laterality were marked prior to each procedure. We focused on recognising events that took place before, during and after the nerve block including non-compliance with the checklist and deviations from protocol.MethodsA safe preoperative block process current and future state flowchart, revised time-out checklist and action/implementation plan as part of our Plan–Do–Study–Act model was constructed using a multidisciplinary approach. Pre-implementation and post- implementation data were collected by medical students acting anonymously via direct observation noting the presence of an anaesthesiologist, resident, nurse, time-out for procedure, checklist completed and procedure start and sedation time representing a complete time-out.ResultsThe direct observations in the pre-implementation group showed a 20% (3/15) compliance with a correct time-out. The direct observations in the post implementation group showed 85% (12/14) compliance. This revealed a 65% increase in all portions of the time-out checklist completed. Comparative analysis confirmed decrease in non-compliance and deviations from protocol as displayed by 65% increase in all portions of time-out checklist completed.ConclusionWe aimed to improve safety, communication and compliance for preoperative nerve blocks through development and implementation of a safe preoperative block process using a multidisciplinary model. We conclude that creation of a safe nerve block was achieved by integration of a preoperative nerve block process which included increased compliance to the time-out checklist, verifying patients and laterality with marking of patient prior to each procedure, identifying proper consents were completed and ensuring each regional nerve block was executed with a proper time-out.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document