scholarly journals Eksistensi Hak Ulayat Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 18 Tahun 2019

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Wimba Roofi Hutama
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Land Community

The Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia recently issued Ministerial Regulation of ATR No. 18 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Administration of Customary Land Community Units of Customary Law. However, the reality is that until now there are still ulayat lands of customary law community units whose management, control and use are based on local customary law provisions and are recognized by the members of the customary law community unit concerned. The research uses normative research, namely normative juridical research, namely research based on applicable laws and legal norms and has binding power to answer the legal issues faced. The results obtained are that the characteristics of customary rights of customary law communities, that customary rights to land are controlled by customary law communities, namely people who live in groups, hereditary based on ties of origin/ancestor or similarity of residence, have the same culture, live in a certain area, have customary property that is jointly owned, have customary institutions containing sanctions, as long as they are still alive according to developments and do not conflict with national law.Keywords: Existence; Customary Rights; Minister of Agrarian Regulation.Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia baru-baru ini menerbitkan Permen ATR No. 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Tata Cara Penatausahaan Tanah Ulayat Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Namun kenyataannya hingga kini masih terdapat tanah ulayat kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang pengurusan, penguasaan dan penggunaannya didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum adat setempat dan diakui oleh para warga kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang bersangkutan”. Penelitian dengan menggunakan penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian didasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan atau norma-norma hukum yang berlaku dan mempunyai kekuatan mengikat guna manjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Diperoleh hasil bahwa Karakteristik hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat, bahwa hak ulayat atas tanah tersebut dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat, yakni masyarakat yang hidup berkelompok, turun menurun berdasarkan ikatan asal usul/leluhur atau kesamaan tempat tinggal, berbudaya sama, hidup dalam satu wilayah tertentu, memiliki harta benda adat milik bersama, mempunyai pranata adat mengandung sanksi, sepanjang masih hidup sesuai perkembangan dan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum nasional.Kata Kunci: Eksistensi; Hak Ulayat; Peraturan Menteri Agraria.

scholarly journals PIDANA MATI BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afdhal Askar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Adverse Impact ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Republic

The development of Corruption Crimes has a widespread adverse impact on the lives of Indonesian people life. To stop this, it is needed to be taken a variety of extraordinary efforts including by implementing capital punishment for perpetrators, especially related to criminal acts of corruption that concern to many people that occur when the country is in danger. Even so, not all people agree with the application of capital punishment because it is considered to be conflict with Human Rights, the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia and Pancasila. To analyze these legal issues, various efforts can be taken such as seeing the meaning of the nature of human rights in the perspective of national and international law, interpreting legal norms using appropriate interpretation methods and seeing the existence of capital punishment in the perspective of religious law and customary law. Writing in this study uses a normative juridical approach with the type of data in the form of secondary data which comes from primary legal material and secondary legal material. The writing is done descriptively.

scholarly journals Analisis Hukum Surat Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Adat (Dati) Di Kota Ambon

SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Desy Kosita Hallauw ◽  
Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja
Keyword(s):  
State Government ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Ownership Rights

Relinquishment of land rights is the relinquishment of legal relations between the holders of land rights and the land under their control by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. Letter of Waiver of rights is evidence that is made with the aim of releasing land rights. A letter of release of customary land rights (dati) is applied in the same way as the release of land rights in general, as enforced in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The process of registering customary land rights (dati) is based on the release of customary rights (dati) issued by the customary land owner (dati) as the basis for rights. So based on the release of land rights, it can be registered at the Ambon City Land Office to obtain proof of land ownership or certificates. The letter of release of customary land rights (dati) issued by the customary State Government in Ambon City is binding as long as it is carried out based on applicable customary law and can be proven the basis of ownership rights to customary land (dati) from the customary land owner (dati) that issues the release letter the land rights. However, as long as it cannot be proven valid, the letter of release of land rights does not have binding power, thus the release of the customary land rights (dati) becomes invalid and the certificate can be canceled.

scholarly journals Hak Milik Atas Tanah Adat Di Wilayah Kepulauan

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Mispa Christian Science Paisina ◽  
Adonia Ivone Laturette ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja
Keyword(s):  
Land Ownership ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Ownership Rights

Introductioan: The Western Seram Islands have various customary rights that grow and develop in the lives of indigenous peoples and it becomes a rule that is believed by them, so that it becomes a law that binds them in determining their ownership rights to their customary land.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine how the position of customary land ownership rights in the national land law system, and what is the legal basis and the way in which customary land ownership rights occur according to customary law.Methods of the Research: This study uses the normative legal research method, which aims to find out how the position of ownership rights over customary land in the national land law system in the areas of Taniwel Timur, Negeri Maloang and Negeri Sohuwe, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province, and to understand what the legal basis and How to Have Land Ownership Rights According to Customary Law in the Taniwel Timur District, Maloang State and Sohuwe State, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province.Results of the Research: In principle, ownership of land rights by a member or group of customary law communities, whether individual or communal / group, has a very binding power de jure and de facto. The principle of ownership in the provision of de jure guarantees in the sense that the customary law community recognizes that if ownership rights are obtained by means of the permission of the head of the association (Kepala Adat or Kepala Soa), to open and manage land for customary law communities it can be said to be a legal act that is legal according to law. adat as long as it does not contradict the prevailing customary law norms, and the principle of ownership in a de facto manner, namely that the principle of ownership has been obtained from generation to generation. This is what the local government must pay attention to in terms of recognition of rights by customary law communities in West Seram District, Maluku Province.

Case Note: The interface between customary rights and environmental legislation: Lessons from Gongqose & Others vs Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries & Others (SCA) 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 134-160
Author(s):  
Alexander Paterson
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Protected Area ◽  
Marine Protected Area ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Eastern Cape ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law And Legislation

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, recognises customary law as an independent and original source of law, subject to the Constitution itself and legislation that specifically deals with customary law. As recognised by the Constitutional Court in Alexkor Ltd vs the Richtersveld Community (2004), customary law, as an independent source of law, may give rise to rights including rights to access and use natural resources. Rights to access and use natural resources are often comprehensively regulated by legislation. Conflicts between customary law and legislation relevant to natural resources may arise, as evidenced in the case of Mr Gongqose, who along with several other community members were caught fishing in the Dwesa-Cwebe Marine Protected Area situated off the Eastern Cape coastline. Notwithstanding their claims to be exercising their customary rights to fish in the area, they were convicted in the Magistrate’s Court for certain offences in terms of the Marine Living Resources Act (1998), under which the marine protected area had been established. Their appeal to the High Court proved unsuccessful and the Supreme Court of Appeal was tasked with considering the relationship between their customary rights to fish and legislation purportedly extinguishing these rights. The SCA’s judgment in Gongqose & Others vs Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries & Others (2018) is the first of its kind in South Africa to consider the extinguishment of customary rights to access and use natural resources through post-constitutional legislation. This note critically considers the guidance the SCA provided on proving the existence of customary rights to access and use natural resources, and the manner in which they may be extinguished through legislation. While the focus is on marine living resources, the lessons emerging from this case are relevant to other natural resource sectors.

scholarly journals Konstitusionalitas Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Hak Ulayat Rumpon di Provinsi Lampung

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Ahmad Redi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto ◽  
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana ◽  
Ade Adhari
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Coastal Communities ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Fishing Gear ◽  
Constitutional Protection ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI MASYARAKAT ADAT TERGERUS OLEH KEBUTUHAN ZAMAN Studi Analisis Konflik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan di Kuningan yang Terusir dari Tanah Adatnya Sendiri dengan Teori Identitas

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rachel Farakhiyah ◽  
Maulana Irfan
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Privately Owned

Pengakuan pemerintah terhadap hukum adat masih setengah hati. Padahal, eksistensi hukum adat memiliki landasan konstitusional yang kuat dalam Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tubrukan antara proyeksi pembangunan dari pemerintah, kepentingan masyarakat umum, beserta hak ulayat dari masyarakat adat, telah menimbulkan gesekan yang sangat rentan akan timbulnya konflik. Seperti halnya yang memicu terjadinya konflik yang memanas di dalam masyarakat sunda wiwitan atas sengketa lahan. Yang mana perlakuan Jaka yang mengklaim tanah adat menjadi tanah milik pribadi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hukum adat dan kemudian ditambah dengan putusan PN Kuningan yang memanangkan permintaan Jaka atas hak milih tanah adat seluas 224 m2. Putusan PN tersebut dinilai cacat hukum dan tidak memperhatikan asal usul sejarah. Maka hal tersebut menimbulkan berbagai aksi perlawanan dari pihak kubu masyarakat adat Sunda Wiwitan untuk berusaha memperoleh kembali haknya atas tanah adat mereka. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan latarbelakang terjadinya konflik dan pemicu terjadinya konflik dengan menggunakan teori identitas yang nantinya dapat dirumuskan resolusi konflik yang efektif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini yaitu menggunakan studi litelatur yang diperoleh dari jurnal,buku, dan berbagai macam berita. Hingga saat ini konflik yang bergulir belum menemukan kejelasan karena belum terdapat resolusi konflik yang jelas dan masih sampai kepada tahap digagalkannya proses eksekusi tanah adat seluas 224 m2oleh Pengadilan Negri Kuningan. Government recognition of customary law is still half-hearted. In fact, the existence of customary law has a strong constitutional foundation in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Collisions between projected development from the government, the interests of the general public, along with customary rights from indigenous peoples, have created a very vulnerable friction in the emergence of conflict. As is the case that triggered a heated conflict in Sunda Wiwitan society over land disputes. Which is the treatment of Jaka who claimed customary land to be privately owned as a form of violation of customary law and then added with the Kuningan District Court decision to adopt Jaka's request for customary land rights of 225 m2. The Kuningan District Court ruling was deemed legally flawed and did not pay attention to the origin of history. So this caused various acts of resistance from the sides of the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people to try to regain their rights to their customary lands. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the background of the occurrence of the conflict and the trigger for the occurrence of conflict by using identity theory which can later be formulated effective conflict resolution. The method used in writing this article is to use litelatur studies obtained from journals, books, and various kinds of news. Until now the rolling conflict has not yet found clarity because there is no clear conflict resolution and is still up to the stage where the process of execution of customary land of 225 m2 was thwarted by the Kuningan District Court.

ASPEK YURIDIS PEMAKAIAN NAMA DAERAH DALAM USAHA KULINER BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Azvina Indriani ◽  
Pranoto '
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Using Data

<p>Abstract</p><p>This article aims to determinate whether in every culinary brand that uses the name of the region is a geographical indication and whether it adversely affects the typical culinary business in the area.This research is done by legal research method. The prescriptive nature of learning the purpose of law, concepts and legal norms. The research approach used is a legal approach to review all laws and regulations on legal issues. Research location at the ministry of justice and human rights of the republic of Indonesia. Research sources are primary legal materials in the form of legislation, secondary legal materials such as bibliography, non legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Technique of collecting data by interview. The technique of analysis of legal materials using data analysis technique with deductive logic.Based on the results of research conducted by the authors can be concluded that in the actual rules the use of regional names for the brand or culinary business is allowed. Because basically not all culinary efforts that use or enter the name of the region is reffered to as a geographical indication. Because it uses a valid region name only if there is a brand element in it.<br />Keywords: Culinary Business; Brand; Geographical Indication.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah dalam setiap suatu merek kuliner yang memakai nama daerah merupakan suatu indikasi geografis dan apakah mempunyai dampak yang buruk terhadap bisnis kuliner yang khas di daerah tersebut.Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum. Bersifat preskriptif yaitu mempelajari tujuan hukum, nilai keadilan validitas aturan hukum, konsep serta norma hukum. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan bersifat pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk menelaah semua undang-undang dan regulasi yang bersangkut dengan isu hukum. Lokasi penelitian di Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. Sumber penelitian adalah bahan hukum primer yang berupa perundang-undangan, Bahan hukum sekunder yaitu kepustakaan, bahan non hukum dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan cara wawancara. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan teknik analisis data dengan logika deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang di lakukan penulis dapat disimpulkan bahwa dalam aturan yang sebenarnya pemakaian nama daerah untuk suatu merek atau bisnis kuliner diizinkan. Karena pada dasarnya tidak semua usaha kuliner yang menggunakan atau mencantumkan nama daerah disebut sebagai indikasi geografis. Karena menggunakan nama daerahsah saja apabila ada elemen merek di dalamnya.<br />Kata kunci: Usaha Kuliner; Merek.;Indikasi Geografis.</p>

scholarly journals The Registration Of “Ulayat”’ Land In West Sumatra: Between The Legal Certainty And The Social Justice

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 585
Author(s):  
A. Yoma Amanda Putri ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Social ◽  
West Sumatra ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
The Right

Ulayat land House of communal rights is a member of the House, as a fellowship of customary law. The purpose of the arrangement of Ulayat Land is to protect the customary land and take the benefits for survival in some generations and uninterrupted between the members of the House with its territory. Conceptually, this is related to a social justice. While the purpose of the registration of land, according to the article 19 BAL is to guarantee the legal certainty over land. The implementation of Customary Land or Ulayat Land Registration was preceded by the creation of the base rights. The making of the pedestal of this right in the form of a waiver of physical mastery of plots of land (Sporadic). Before the creation of the pedestal of this right was preceded by the creation of Ranji by Ninik Mamak, which was passed by the House. The writing Empirical Juridical approach, was supported by empirical juridical approach. Empirical juridical approach was done by collecting all the materials and data obtained from the field-related to the problems are examined. Registration of the customary (Ulayat) rights of the House is done by applying to the Head Office of land district/city. The filing listed on behalf of or Mamak Head Heirs using a waiver of physical mastery of parcels of the land that are signed by the Mamak Head Chiefs as Heir. The statement must be approved by the head of the tribe or Tribal King and Chairman of custom Density Nagari and known by Lurah/village chief concerned by attaching a document containing the names of the members of the House of at least three generations created by Mamak Chief Heir and known by the ruler of the tribe and the leader of the RIGHT. The registration of Customary House was expected to guarantee legal certainty for members of the House as a fellowship of customary law, because it is aimed at maintaining Customary Rights for indigenous Justice. Therefore, the customary land register of House in conceptional in touch with the land registry purposes, i.e. to guarantee legal certainty while also embodying a sense of Justice for indigenous citizens (members of the House). Keywords: Social Justice; Legal Certainty; The Registration of Ulayat Land.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HAK ATAS TANAH MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (25) ◽  
pp. 69-84
Author(s):  
Jhon A Mebri
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Close Correlation ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Economic Resource ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land

Land has a very important meaning in human life, because most of human life depends on the land. There is a close correlation between man and the land and there is no human in this world who does not need the land. The land is not only understood as an economic resource, but for others it sees the land as sacred and one of the indigenous peoples of Papua must preserve. So with the government policy to allocate land for public interest often conflict with the interest of indigenous people of Papua. Related to the procurement of land is regulated in Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for Public Interest. The focus of this research is how to recognize and regulate land rights of indigenous and tribal peoples for the public interest in Papua and how are the legal effects on customary land rights for indigenous and tribal peoples in Papua? By using normative research methods it can be concluded that the recognition and regulation of indigenous peoples' rights to land as customary rights in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Agrarian Law, the Law on Special Autonomy and Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, is recognized Of its existence and use in accordance with applicable provisions in indigenous and tribal peoples. However, in practice it is often not in accordance with the provisions in force in Indonesia, so as not to provide justice and legal certainty.The legal consequences of customary law community land acquisition for public interest are the form of indemnity for indigenous and tribal peoples through the agreed mechanism and the transfer of land rights of customary law community to the government.

The Law and Land Grabbing: Friend or Foe?

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liz Alden Wily
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Land Acquisitions ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Large Scale Land ◽  
Customary Land

AbstractThis paper reflects upon the role of law in the contemporary surge in global large-scale land acquisitions. Its point of reference is the land security of several billion rural poor who traditionally own and use untitled lands that are classified as state lands or unowned public lands in national laws. Most of the affected lands are off-farm areas including forests, marshlands, and rangelands. Investors target these lands in belief they are unowned. Governments concur, selling or leasing these lands on grounds of being technically the lawful owner and despite awareness that these lands are occupied and used. Despite the longstanding nature of such conflicts as well known and long debated, the present land rush brings unresolved contradictions between statutory and customary law and associated meanings of property firmly to the fore. Using Sub-Saharan Africa as the example, this paper examines the legal effects. It is shown that while millions of local land rights are threatened, the land rush also vitalises demands for improved national law status for unregistered customary rights, including those such as forest and rangelands purposely held by communities in common. To this extent, the contemporary rush could prove as much legal friend as foe to majority land rights in agrarian economies. This is partly because the current rush, unlike those that have gone before it, occurs in an environment of advanced popular communication, emergent mass empowerment, and has the advantage of a pre-rush era of legal improvement in the handling of indigenous and customary land rights that has established alternative precedents. Opportunities to coerce modification of classical dispossessory paths of economic growth strongly exist. Global advocacy for secure community land rights is rapidly advancing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document