scholarly journals The application of a targeted periprostatic nerve block in transperineal template-guided prostate biopsies

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2125-2132
Author(s):  
Xue-Fei Ding ◽  
Yang Luan ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Yao-Zong Xu ◽  
Cheng-Hao Guo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 2663-2669
Author(s):  
Sung Jin Kim ◽  
Jongpill Lee ◽  
Dong Hyeon An ◽  
Chang-Hoo Park ◽  
Ju Hyun Lim ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Müntener ◽  
Markus Fatzer ◽  
Valentin Praz ◽  
Urs Straumann ◽  
Räto T. Strebel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali H. Yilmaz ◽  
Elif Ziypak ◽  
Tevfik Ziypak ◽  
Mehmet Aksoy ◽  
Senol Adanur ◽  
...  

Introduction: To determine whether a combination of the long acting local anesthetic, bupivacaine, and lidocaine is better than lidocaine alone in the long-term pain control, which is a short-acting anesthetic. Materials and Methods: In group 1, periprostatic nerve block was applied to both neurovascular areas with 2% lidocaine (5 ml) in an isotonic solution (5 ml). In group 2, the combination of 2% lidocaine (5 ml) and 5mg/ml bupivacaine (5 ml) was used for the PPNB. Results: In the first 30 minutes the mean VAS scores of groups 1 and 2 were 2.1 ± 0.2 and 1.2 ± 0.1, respectively (p = 0.002). VAS scores of group II determined at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the biopsy were significantly lower since it was (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While periprostatic nerve block for late phase pain control, applying a combination of a long-acting local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine, is effective in terms of pain control and patient comfort.


BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Yoo ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
Byung Ha Chung ◽  
Kwang Suk Lee

Abstract Background We identified pain variation according to prostate biopsy sites and compared differences in pain relief according to the site of periprostatic nerve block (PNB). Methods This retrospective study collected data from 312 patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsies between January 2019 and August 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the site of local anesthesia (base vs. base and apex PNB), with each block achieved with 2.5 cm3 of 2% lidocaine. Pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at the following time points: probe insertion, PNB at base, PNB at apex, each of the 12 core biopsy sites, and 15 min after biopsy. The results were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results The average pain scores were significantly higher in the base-only PNB group than were those in the base and apex PNB group (3.88 vs 2.82, p < 0.001). In the base-only PNB group, the pain scores increased from base to apex (p < 0.001), and the pain at each site also gradually increased as the biopsy proceeded (p < 0.001). In contrast, in the base and apex PNB group, there was minor change in pain scores throughout the procedure. Conclusions The pain scores varied at each site during the prostate biopsy. The provision of a base and apex PNB provided greater pain relief than does base-only PNB during prostate biopsy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
TaiwoOpeyemi Alabi ◽  
KehindeHabeeb Tijani ◽  
AdekunleAyokunle Adeyomoye ◽  
EmmanuelAjibola Jeje ◽  
CharlesChidozie Anunobi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document