scholarly journals Strategi belajar overlearning menggunakan media edmodo dapat meningkatkan motivasi belajar biologi peserta didik

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43
Author(s):  
Reski Rahayu Ramadan ◽  
Safei Safei ◽  
Eka Damayanti ◽  
Jamilah Jamilah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Biology Learning ◽  
Media Learning

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji perbedaan motivasi belajar biologi peserta didik yang diajar dengan penerapan strategi belajar overlearning yang menggunakan media edmodo dengan tanpa menggunakan media edmodo di kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 9 Sinjai. Penelitian kuantitatif eksperimen semu (quasi eksperimental design), ini menggunakan the static comparasion group design. Sampel berjumlah 29 peserta didik kelas XI MIA 3 di kelas eksperimen dan sebanyak 29 peserta didik kelas XI MIA 4 di kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan berupa angket motivasi belajar. Data dianalisis menggunakan independent sampel t test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan motivasi belajar biologi yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning menggunakan media edmodo dengan peserta didik yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning tanpa menggunakan media edmodo. Rata-rata motivasi belajar yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning dengan menggunakan media edmodo lebih tinggi daripada peserta didik yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning tanpa menggunakan media edmodo sehingga motivasi belajar peserta didik dapat ditingkatkan dengan penerapan strategi belajar overlearning melalui media edmodo. Kata kunci: media edmodo; motivasi belajar; strategi belajar overlearning ABSTRACTOverlearning strategies using edmodo media can increase the motivation of students in learning biologyThis study aims to examine the differences in biology learning motivation of students who were taught by applying the overlearning learning strategy using Edmodo media and students who were taught without using Edmodo media in class XI MIA SMA Negeri 9 Sinjai. This quasi-experimental quasi-experimental research used the comparison group design. The sample consisted of 29 students of class XI MIA 3 in the experimental class and 29 students of class XI MIA 4 in the control class. The instrument of the research was a learning motivation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test. The results showed there is a difference in the motivation of the students who were taught by applying the overlearning learning strategy using Edmodo media and the students who were taught without using Edmodo media. Learning motivation taught by applying overlearning learning strategies using Edmodo media higher than without using Edmodo media. It concluded that the students learning motivation can be improved by implementing overlearning learning strategies with Edmodo media.Keywords: edmodo media; learning motivation; overlearning learning strategy

scholarly journals Perbedaan Jigsaw II dan GI terhadap pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah masalah pada kompetensi mendiagnosis permasalahan pengoperasian PC dan Peripheral ditinjau dari motivasi belajar

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pipit Utami ◽  
Pardjono Pardjono
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah pada materi KK3: (1) antara siswa yang diajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Group Investigation (GI) ketika motivasi belajar TKJ dikendalikan; dan (2) antara penggunaan tipe pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI) dengan tingkat motivasi belajar TKJ (tinggi dan rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan nonequivalent comparison-group design menggunakan dua kelas perlakuan sebagai variabel bebas yang diberikan pembelajaran kooperatif dengan dua tipe berbeda. Satu kelas menggunakan tipe Jigsaw II, sedangkan kelas yang lainnya diberikan tipe GI. Variabel motivasi belajar TKJ dijadikan sebagai pembagi kategori kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah serta sebagai kovarian. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis multivarian kovariat dan desain faktorial dengan progam SPSS 16. Artikel ini menunjukkan tujuan kedua, dengan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) untuk pencapaian pemahaman konsep, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah, akan tetapi untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI; dan (2) untuk pencapaian pemecahan masalah, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah maupun siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI. Kata  THE DIFFERENCES OF JIGSAW II AND GI ON THE CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING AND PROBLEM SOLVING IN COMPETENCE OF DIAGNOSING PROBLEMS WHEN OPERATE PC AND PERIPHERAL IN TERMS OF LEARNING MOTIVATIONAbstractThis research aims to describe the differences of concept understanding and problem solving on the KK3 material: (1) between students taught using the cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type when TKJ learning motivation was controlled; and (2) between the use of cooperative learning (Jigsaw Type II and Group Investigation (GI) Type) with the levels of TKJ learning motivation (high and low). This research was quasi-experimental with the nonequivalent comparison-group design using two treatment classes as independent variables which were given cooperative learning with two different types. One class used the Jigsaw Type II while the other used the GI Type. The TKJ learning motivation was used as the divider category of students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation as well as covariant. The data analysis technique in this research was the multivariat analysis of covariate and factorial design using the SPSS 16 program. This article shows the second aim, and the results shows that: (1) for concept understanding achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied for students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation, but for those who have low TKJ learning motivation, GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II; and (2) for problem solving achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied to students who have high TKJ learning motivation, where for those who have high and low TKJ learning motivation GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Keefektifan Cornell Notes Method Dan Mind Maps Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Nurul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Note Taking ◽  
Paired Sample ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Eighth Grade Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mind Maps

This study aims to examine the comparison of the effectiveness of note taking styles of students who use the cornell notes method and mind maps in terms of student self-efficacy. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study with a pretets-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of SMPN 1 Sungguminasa. The sample is class VIIIE and VIIIB as the experimental class. Class VIIIE is treated in the form of a note-taking style using cornell notes, while class VIIIB is treated as a note-taking style by mind maps. To test the effectiveness of learning using a paired sample t test. To test the difference in effectiveness using the independent sample t-test. The results of this study are: 1) the cornell notes method is not effective if viewed from the students' self efficacy, 2) mind maps is effective if it is reviewed by students' self-efficacy. 3) There is a difference in effectiveness between the cornell notes method and mind maps in terms of students' self-efficacy where students who record by mind maps get better efficacy scores than students who record by cornell notes method.

scholarly journals Dampak Komunikasi Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Sekolah Dasar

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viana Teti Anggraeni ◽  
Sutama Sutama ◽  
Samino Samino
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Communication Competence ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Scheffe Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One

This study aims at know 1) in the contribution learning strategy for achievement; 2) contribution communication math for achievement; 4) the interaction learning strategy shown from the communication math for achievement. This was a quasi-experimental study employing the nonequivalent comparison-group design. This study involved two experimental groups. The sampel comprised Grade V students of SDN I Pengkok consisting of 2  classes to determine the class receiving the treatment of the cooperative learning model of the TGT  and the one receiving that of the TTW . The research instruments consisted of test and non-test instruments. The data were analyzed by theunivariate technique, namely the independent sample t-test  ata significance level of 5%. The data were analyzed  using the three way anova at a significance level of 5%. Follow up by a scheffe test fortwo-tailed test. The results of the study show that; 1) students who taught with TGT  get higher achievement; 2) the students who have high math communication competence have better achieve- ment; 4) the students who taught TGT type get higher achievement and the students have  high math communication competence get achievement

scholarly journals Keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving dalam pembelajaran kalkulus II

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Markus Palobo
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One ◽  
Approach Problem

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving serta membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent comparison group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Musamus Merauke. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika semester II yang dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving menggunakan uji one sample t-test dan untuk mengetahui pendekatan mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar; (2) pendekatan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar; dan (3) pendekatan problem posing lebih efektif dari pada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach in calculus II learning AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach, and to compare the effectiveness between problem posing and problem solving approach in terms of attitude toward Calculus and learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group design. The population of this study were student of Musamus University. The sample in this study were 2nd semester students of mathematics educations departement who were divided into two groups. To assess the effectiveness of the problem posing and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out and to determine the more effective approach, independent sample t-test was used. The results of this study show that (1) the problem posing approach was effective in terms of attitude towards Calculus and learning achievement; (2) problem solving approach was effective in terms of learning achievement; and (3) problem posing approach was more effective than problem solving approach in terms of students attitude toward calculus.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, attitude toward Calculus, leraning achievement

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN KEEFEKTIFAN QUANTUM TEACHING DAN TGT PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI PRESTASI DAN MOTIVASI

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisnawati Trisnawati ◽  
Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Instruction ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Teaching Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Teaching Models ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT) dan membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT) pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan motivasi belajar siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi-experiment dengan desain pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta, sedangkan sampelnya adalah siswa kelas VIII-D dan VIII-E. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes prestasi belajar dan angket motivasi belajar siswa. Untuk menguji keefektifan model  pembelajaran (Quantum Teachingdan TGT), data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT), data dianalisis dengan menggunakan MANOVA kemudian dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Bonferoni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran (Quantum TeachingdanTGT) efektif dan model Quantum Teaching lebih efektif daripada model TGT ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan motivasi belajar siswa. Kata Kunci: model quantum teaching, model TGT, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM TEACHING AND TGT IN MATHEMATICS’ INSTRUCTION VIEWED FROM ACHIEVEMENT AND MOTIVATION Abstract This study aims to describe the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching and Cooperative TGT Models and compare the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching models with TGT in mathematics’ instruction viewed from the students’ achievement and learning motivation. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population was all grade VIII students, while the sample is students of Class VIII-D and VIII-E. The data collecting instruments consisted of a students’ learning achievement test and learning motivation to questionnaires. To test the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching and TGT models, the data were analyzed using one sample t-test. Then, to comparethe effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching models TGT models, the data were analyzed using MANOVA and continued using the t-Beonferroni test. The results of the study show that the Quantum Teaching and TGT models are effective and the Quantum Teaching model is more effective than the TGT models in mathematics’ instruction viewed from the students’ achievement and learning motivation. Keywords: quantum teaching models, TGT models, learning achievement, learning motivation

scholarly journals Pengaruh media animasi terhadap hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa materi sistem kelistrikan otomotif

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadek Sukiyasa ◽  
Sukoco Sukoco
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Electrical System ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Scheffe Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan media animasi terhadap hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar materi sistem kelistrikan otomotif. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen ini menggunakan desain nonequivalent control group design. Jumlah responden sebanyak 63 orang. Instrumen pengumpulan data hasil belajar adalah tes, dan instrumen pengumpulan data motivasi belajar adalah angket. Data dianalisis dengan statistik parametris, yaitu uji-t dengan teknik independent sampel t-test dan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe. Hasilnya adalah terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari penggunaan media animasi terhadap hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar materi sistem kelistrikan otomotif pada siswa kelas X TKR di SMKN 1 Seyegan, ditunjukkan dengan hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan media animasi lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan media powerpoint. EFFECT ANIMATION MEDIA ON STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES AND LEARNING MOTIVATIONAbstractThe purpose of this study to determine the effect of animation media on learning outcomes and learning motivation the automotive electrical system material. This quasi-experimental research using nonequivalent control group design. The number of respondents being 63 students. The instrument for data collection for learning outcomes was a test, and the instrument for learning motivation was a questionnaire. The data were analyzed using parametric statistic namely t-test with independent sample t-test techniques and advanced test with Scheffe test. The result is that there is a significant effect of the use of animation media on learning outcomes and learning motivation on the automotive electrical system material among class X student of TKR of SMK Negeri 1 Seyegan, indicated by the learning outcomes and learning motivation of students who are taught by the animation media higher than the learning outcomes and learning motivation of students who are taught by powerpoint media.

scholarly journals Gallery of Learning with Geogebra: Does it Affect Students’ Learning Motivation?

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218
Author(s):  
Aan Putra ◽  
M Hafis ◽  
Laswadi Laswadi ◽  
Mesi Oktafia
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Active Learning Strategies ◽  
The One ◽  
Active Learning Strategy

This study aimed to determine the effect of Gallery of Learning with Geogebra as active learning strategies on students’ learning motivation. This research was a quantitative study with the one grup pretest-posttest design. The population of this study was all eight-grade students of SMP Negeri 27 Kerinci. The sample consisted of 27 students which selected by saturated sampling techniques. Student motivation data were obtained from motivation questionnaires that given before and after the application of the Gallery of Learning with Geogebra as active learning strategy. Data processing of student motivation was done by comparing students' motivation scores before and after treatmen by, using the t-test. The t-test results indicated that there was influence on the implementation of the active learning strategy of Gallery of Learning with Geogebra on students' learning motivation.

scholarly journals Keefektifan PBL seting kolaboratif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Tety Dwi Setyaningsih ◽  
Agus Maman Abadi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Anxiety ◽  
Math Anxiety ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan mana yang lebih efektif antara PBL setting kolaboratif kelompok dan berpasangan ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-postest nonequivalent comparison-group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Kalasan yang terdiri dari empat kelas. Kelas VII C dan VII D ditentukan sebagai sampel secara acak. Dari kedua kelas tersebut diberi instrumen pretest dan postest tentang prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket kecemasan siswa. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran digunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan digunakan uji MANOVA dan untuk mengetahui pembelajaran mana yang lebih efektif digunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) PBL seting kolaboratif kelompok maupun berpasangan masing-masing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan siswa, (2) PBL seting kolaboratif kelompok lebih efektif dibandingkan PBL seting kolaboratif berpasangan ditinjau dari prestasi belajar aljabar, namun tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan siswa. The effectiveness of PBL with collaborative setting in terms of algebraic achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety AbstractThis study aimed to describe which was more effective between PBL with grouped collaborative setting or paired collaborative setting in terms of the algebraic achievement, critical thinking ability, and mathematics anxiety. This research was quasi-experimental with the pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The research population included all 7th grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Kalasan which consisted of four classes. Two classes were randomly established as the sample. Before and after the treatment, these two classes were given a pretest and posttest of algebraic achievements, critical thinking ability, and and questionnaire of math anxiety. To test the effectiveness of this study, the researcher used one sample t-test; to examine differences in the effectiveness, the researcher used MANOVA; to determine which learning model was more effective, the researcher used the independent sample t-test. The results of this study show that: (1) the PBL with grouped and paired collaborative setting were effective in terms of the algebraic achievements, critical thinking ability, and mathematics anxiety, (2) the PBL with grouped collaborative setting was more effective than that using the PBL with paired collaborative setting in terms of algebraic achievement, but no difference in the effectiveness in terms of critical thinking ability and math anxiety

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI GENIUS LEARNING DAN DISPOSISI MATEMATIS TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feniareny Feniareny
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This study was aimed at determining: (1) the effect of Genius Learning strategy toward concept understanding compared with conventional; (2) the effect of Genius Learning strategy towards concept understanding with high mathematical disposition compared with conventional; (3) the effect of Genius Learning strategy towards concept understanding with low mathematical disposition compared with conventional; (4) the interaction between learning strategy and mathematical disposition in influencing concept understanding. This study was designed as quasi-experimental research by using a 2 x 2 factorial. The data were obtained by using mathematical disposition questionnairesand concept understanding test. Data were analyzed by using t-test and Anova.The result of the data showed that: (1) understanding of the concepts taught by Genius Learning strategy was higher than conventional; (2) understanding of the concepts with high mathematical disposition taught by Genius Learning was higher than conventional; (3) understanding of the concepts with lower mathematical disposition taught by Genius Learning was higher than conventional; (4) There was no interaction between learning strategies andthemathematical disposition in influencing students’ understanding of the concept.Keywords: Concept Understanding; Mathematical Disposition; Genius Learning

THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING STRATEGY AND LEARNING MOTIVATION ON THE RESULTS OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN SMPN 45 MEDAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Siti Fatimah
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Simulation Learning

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out and describe: (1) the effect of the<br />application of learning strategies on the learning outcomes of students'<br />Islamic Education, (2) the effect of learning motivation on student Islamic<br />Education learning outcomes, and (3) the interaction between learning<br />strategies and learning motivation towards learning outcomes of students'<br />Islamic Education.The method of this research is quasi-experimental with<br />the population of this study are VII grade students of SMPN 45 Medan<br />consisting of 5 classes. The sample was selected by cluster random<br />sampling technique in this case taken one simulation learning strategy and<br />one class taught with expository strategies. The instruments of data<br />collection are questionnaires and test results. Technique by analysis of<br />variance (Anava) at = 0.05. The results of this study are: (1) the average<br />student learning outcomes taught with simulation learning strategies <br />higher than the average student learning outcomes learned by the<br />expository learning strategy, (2) the average learning outcomes of<br />students with high learning motivation higher than the learning outcomes<br />of students with low learning motivation, and (3) there is an interaction<br />between learning strategies and learning motivation towards learning<br />outcomes.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document