Case of Patient with AML with Complex Karyotype including Ultra-Rare t(4;8)(q32;q13), t(4;11)(q21;p15) and Familial Aggregation of Myeloid Malignancies

We present a unique case of a young woman with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with complex karyotype. The presence of the t(4;11)(q23;p15) is extremely rare in myeloid leukemias, while t(4;8)(q32;q13) has not yet been described in any leukemia reference. Another interesting issue is the familial aggregation of myeloid malignancies and worse course of the disease in each subsequent generation, as well as an earlier onset of the disease. Our report emphasizes the need for thorough pedigree examination upon myeloid malignancy diagnosis as there are relatives for whom counseling, gene testing, and surveillance may be highly advisable.

The Leukemic Phase of ALK-Negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Is Associated with CD7 Positivity, Complex Karyotype, TP53 Deletion, and a Poor Prognosis

Patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) rarely develop a leukemic phase of the disease. The reported leukemic ALCL cases are almost all ALK-positive, which are frequently associated with small cell morphology, t(2;5)(p23;q35), and a poorer prognosis. Rare leukemic ALK-negative ALCL cases have been reported. In the present study, we investigated the clinical and pathologic features and outcomes of nine patients with leukemic ALK-negative ALCL and compared these features with 39 patients without leukemic disease. Compared with the non-leukemic ALK-negative ALCL group, patients with leukemic disease more often had absolute lymphocytosis (50% vs. 0%, p = 0.008), thrombocytopenia (60% vs. 11%, p = 0.03), bone marrow involvement (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.04), and CD7 positivity (71% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Four of five (80%) patients with leukemic ALK-negative ALCL had a complex karyotype, which was significantly higher than that of the patients in the non-leukemic group. A fluorescence in situ hybridization for TP53 was performed on six leukemic ALK-negative ALCL cases and all (100%) had TP53 deletion. There were no significant differences in the other clinicopathologic features, treatment, and complete remission rates between patients in the leukemic versus non-leukemic group (all p > 0.05). The median follow-up of this cohort was 18 months with a range of 0.3–140 months. Eight of nine (90%) patients with leukemic ALK-negative ALCL died, and their overall survival was significantly shorter than that of the patients with non-leukemic disease (median 15.5 vs. 60 months, p = 0.001). In conclusion, we show that the leukemic phase of ALK-negative ALCL is associated with high-risk biologic features and, in particular, a complex karyotype and TP53 deletion. Compared with the non-leukemic ALK-negative ALCL patients, the patients with a leukemic phase of disease have poorer survival and may require more aggressive treatment.

Biology and Treatment of High-Risk CLL: Significance of Complex Karyotype

Several reports highlight the clinical significance of cytogenetic complexity, namely, complex karyotype (CK) identified though the performance of chromosome banding analysis (CBA) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Indeed, apart from a number of studies underscoring the prognostic and predictive value of CK in the chemo(immune)therapy era, mounting evidence suggests that CK could serve as an independent prognosticator and predictor even in patients treated with novel agents. In the present review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the clinical impact of CK in CLL, touching upon open issues related to the incorporation of CK in the clinical setting.

TP53 Allelic Status in Myeloid Malignancies

Introduction TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in regulating cell division and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. In hematologic malignancies, TP53 alterations are present in both myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. TP53 alterations including both sequence level mutations and deletions occur in 8-10% of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and are significantly enriched in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms with a frequency of 25-40%. TP53 alterations are associated with complex karyotype, resistance to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy and dismal outcome, and are well established poor prognostic markers for both AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). While both biallelic and monoallelic TP53 alterations are seen, biallelic TP53 alteration is more frequent in both AML and MDS. In the instances of monoallelic TP53 alterations, the remaining wild-type allele can be inhibited by the dominant negative effect of the mutant p53. The clinical implication of TP53 allelic status remains controversial. Biallelic TP53 alterations and/or high TP53 mutation variant allele frequency (VAF) are associated with older patients, complex karyotype, few co-occurring mutations and poor outcome in both AML and MDS. Other studies demonstrate that biallelic vs. monoallelic TP53 alterations or high vs. low TP53 VAF have similar prognosis in myeloid malignancies. Current European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommends testing TP53 deletion using karyotype analysis and TP53 mutations by molecular testing. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with myeloid malignancies, myeloid next generation sequencing (NGS) panel and cytogenetic tests performed at ARUP Laboratories. We identified 18 patients with myeloid malignancies and TP53 mutations. We used a combination of karyotype analysis, FISH, chromosomal microarray (CMA) and NGS to determine the TP53 allelic status. Results: 18 patients diagnosed with myeloid malignancies and TP53 mutations were identified. Among them, 6 were diagnosed with AML, 10 had MDS, one with CMML and one had post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Age range is from 31 to 78 with a median age 65.5 years. 23 TP53 mutations were identified among 18 patients. The majority (78%) of TP53 mutations are located in the DNA binding domain. Co-occurring mutations are uncommon in patients with TP53 mutations. 11 out of 18 patients did not have co-occurring mutations in other myeloid malignancy related genes. Three cases had 1, three cases had 2, and one case had 3 co-occurring mutations at the time of diagnosis. Karyotype analysis and FISH were performed on all 18 patients. CMA was performed on 9 patients. 17p abnormalities, defined by the deletion or copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) of 17p, were seen in 9 out of 18 cases. The 17p abnormalities in 8 out of these 9 cases were visible by karyotype. Case 11 had a CN-LOH identified by CMA which was cryptic by karyotype. Typical complex karyotype was seen in 16 out of 18 cases. Biallelic TP53 alterations are defined by either the presence of a TP53 mutation with a 17p abnormality (deletion or CN-LOH), or two TP53 mutations with similar VAF, or one TP53 mutation with VAF >50%. Biallelic TP53 alterations were seen more frequently compared with monoallelic TP53 alterations (14 vs. 4 patients) and enriched in older patients (Figure 1). All 6 AML patients had biallelic TP53 alterations. Outcome data is available in 10 patients including 8 patients with biallelic and 2 patients with monoallelic TP53 alterations. Patients with biallelic TP53 alterations have dismal outcome (Figure 2). Patient 7 represents an atypical patient with TP53 alteration in our study cohort. She was diagnosed with MDS at the age of 31. She had monoallelic TP53 mutation with a relatively low VAF and normal karyotype through her disease course. Her MDS never progressed and she remained in remission after transplant for more than four years and still doing well. Conclusion: In this study, we evaluated the TP53 allelic status in 18 patients with myeloid malignancies. Biallelic TP53 alterations are more frequent than monoallelic TP53 alterations, and are associated with older patients, and fewer co-occurring mutations. Biallelic TP53 alterations are associated with typical complex karyotype and dismal outcome. Our study supports the importance to differentiate between biallelic and monoallelic TP53 alterations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Clinical Outcome of t-AML with Respect to Genetic Abnormalities and Treatment Intensity - Single Center Analysis over the Past Two Decades

Background: Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) represents emerging challenge of the modern oncology as a life-threatening complication of cytotoxic therapy. Disease characterises poor prognosis and presence of adverse cytogenetic and genetic abnormalities. The goal of the study: Clinical outcome of t-AML patients with respect to genetic changes and treatment intensity. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive AML patients treated in years 2000-2021 in one hematological center was performed. Diagnosis of t-AML was established according to WHO 2016 criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was defined to evaluate treatment outcomes only within t-AML patients undergoing intensive treatment (standard induction/consolidation; allogeneic cell transplantation (alloHCT) if eligible). Results: Among 743 AML patients 60 (8.1%) were diagnosed as t-AML (38 woman) with median age 57 years. Solid tumors (ST) preceded t-AML in 63.3%, hematological neoplasms (HN) in 36.7%. Majority of t-AML was preceded by breast cancer (30.0%), Hodgkin Lymphoma (11.7%), non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (10.0%) and ovarian cancer (10.0%). Median latency time for ST and HN subgroups was 5 vs 7 years respectively (P = .036). Previous cytotoxic therapy consisted of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or combination in 56.6%, 18.3% and 25.0% (autologous cell transplantation was performed in 54.5% of HN). Cytogenetic and molecular biology analysis was performed in 44 and 27 of t-AML respectively. Cytogenetic abnormalities, complex karyotype and normal karyotype occurred in 78.9%, 28.9% and 15.8% patients. KMT2A, RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and PML-RARA rearrangement was found in 21.1%, 18.4% and 7.9% of t-AML. FLT3-ITD, FLT-TKD, NPM1 and C-KIT DNA sequence variant occurred as follows: 14.8%, 7.4%, 3.7% and 3.7% correspondingly. Three pathogenic TP53 DNA sequence variants were detected in t-AML patients: c.711G>A, c.704A>G and c.989T>C (analysis performed on 20 t-AML patients). According ELN2017 genetic risk stratification patients were classified as adverse, intermediate and favorable in 51.4%, 35.1% and 13.5% respectively. Intensive treatment was implemented in 48 patients including alloHCT in 23 of them. Median OS and PFS was 15 and 8 months respectively for whole treated group. Median OS in t-AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy only vs alloHCT was 7 vs 47 months (P = .0025) with 12-year OS after alloHCT- 21.1% (Fig.1A). Among therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia (t-APL) patients median OS was not reached, without alloHCT. Median OS was higher for t-AML patients younger than 65 years than older ones: 20 vs 13 months respectively (P = .048) (Fig.1B). Among t-AML median OS in subgroup with adverse ELN 2017 vs intermediate and favorable ELN 2017 was 15 vs 40 months (P = .037) with 5-years OS 8.2% vs 41.0% (Fig.1C). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model alloHCT was the only factor significantly influencing OS (HR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.05-0.56, P = .004). All patients with TP53 mutations were intensively treated, one patient underwent alloHCT. 66.6% of patients had complex karyotype and any co-occuring DNA sequence variant was detected. Importantly, c.704A>G and c.989T>C TP53 DNA sequence variants were not previously described in AML according Catalogue of Somatic Mutations In Cancer database. Median OS in t-AML with TP53 mutation vs without was 4 vs 7 months (P = .398) (Fig.1D). Conslusions: Our study brings detailed analysis of clinical outcome of t-AML. Patients with t-AML undergoing intensive treatment, younger than 65 years and with t-APL have significantly higher OS rates. On the contrary t-AML patients classified as adverse genetic ELN2017 subgroup have poorer OS rates. Treatment strategy in t-AML should rely on performing alloHCT possibly soon. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Two Distinct Clinical Courses and Outcomes in T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia

Introduction: T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare type of mature T-cell neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Up to 30% of patients initially present with indolent disease course that may be observed until progression to T-PLL with aggressive behavior. We aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with initially indolent versus aggressive disease. We hypothesized that patients with indolent disease have less cytogenetic abnormalities and a favorable overall survival (OS). Methods: We identified 65 patients diagnosed with T-PLL between 2004 and 2020 who were treated at Moffitt Cancer Center. Clinical presentation, laboratory parameters, and bone marrow biopsy at the time of diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: indolent or aggressive disease type. Patients were considered indolent if they did not have symptoms requiring immediate treatment such as B symptoms or fatigue, symptomatic lymphadenopathy, symptomatic organomegaly, hyperlymphocytosis, organ dysfunction, or cytopenias requiring transfusions. Patients with 3 or more chromosomal abnormalities were considered to have complex cytogenetics. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared using Chi-square test. OS and factors that are potential influencers of survival were compared using the Kaplan Meier curve as well as Cox Proportional Hazards regression. Results: Of the 65 patients with T-PLL, 32 (49%) presented with indolent disease and 33 (51%) presented with aggressive disease. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range 43-88 years). Patients with aggressive disease presented with a higher WBC compared to those with indolent disease, with median WBC 79.7 x 10 9/L and 22.9 x 10 9/L, respectively (p=<0.001). Patients with aggressive disease also presented with a higher absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), with median ALC 47.8 x 10 9/L and 15.4 x 10 9/L (p=<0.001) (Table 1). Extra-nodal, skin, and CNS involvement was not significantly different between disease types. Flow cytometry was similar between indolent and aggressive disease with the exception with the exception of CD56 and CD57 which were rare and only observed in aggressive disease. Patients with aggressive disease were more likely to have complex karyotype compared to patients with indolent disease (p=0.023). FISH results for inversion 14 and trisomy 8 were similar between disease types. Median time from diagnosis to initial treatment was 379 days for indolent and 44 days for those with aggressive disease. 36 (55%) patients were treated with Alemtuzumab as first line treatment. A total of 15 (23%) patients ultimately underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The median OS for the entire cohort was 30 months. The median OS for indolent and aggressive disease was 44 and 24 months, respectively (p=0.015, Figure 1). The median OS for patients who underwent HSCT compared to those who did not was 99 and 24 months, respectively (p=0.002). Among patients with indolent disease, those who underwent HSCT had a significantly longer median OS of 153 compared to 34 months for those who did not (p=0.022). There was a trend toward improved OS in patients with aggressive disease who underwent HSCT compared to those that did not (35 vs 16 months; p=0.08). In addition, there was a trend toward improved OS with earlier treatment (<12 months) in the indolent group (383 versus 86 months, p= 0.155). On multivariate analysis (Table 2), factors that negatively affected overall survival were aggressive disease type (HR 3.0, p=0.018), presence of inversion 14 (HR 2.5, p=0.032), presence of B symptoms (HR 2.4, p=0.036), and absence of HSCT (HR 0.2, p=0.001). Conclusion: Patients with T-PLL who present with aggressive disease, inversion 14, B symptoms, and those who are unable to undergo bone marrow transplant have lower overall survival. Characteristics that predict a more aggressive disease phenotype at diagnosis are high WBC, high ALC, presence of B symptoms, and complex karyotype. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Saeed: Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Other: investigator; Other-TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: investigator; sano-aventis U.S.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Other-Epizyme, Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, LP: Consultancy, Other: investigator; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Other: investigator; MEI Pharma Inc: Consultancy, Other: investigator; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: research investigator; MorphoSys AG: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Other-Secura Bio, Inc.: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sokol: Dren Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Hypomethylating Therapy Does Not Improve Outcome of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasm Including TP53 Mutated and Complex Karyotype Subgroups

Introduction: Therapy related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) is a rare but devastating complication of cytotoxic therapy used for management of unrelated malignancy or autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic options for t-MN are limited and although hypomethylating agents (HMA) are frequently used, the benefit of it in t-MN is unclear. There are no prospective trials of HMA in t-MN and published experience is based on retrospective analysis of small number of cases (n=42 to 54). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of HMA therapy in t-MN patients and evaluate predictors for it. Methods: t-MN patients managed with first line HMA therapy were analyzed. This study was approved by the participating institutional review board. Criteria for inclusion were a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of t-MN based on WHO 2016 criteria, age >18 years, and ≥1 cycle of decitabine or azacitidine. Patient characteristics were summarized by frequency (percentage). Overall survival was calculated from the time of starting azacitidine to last follow up or death date using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model. Statistical analysis was performed using R program and significance was defined as P<0.05. Results: Of the 554 t-MN patients analyzed, 184 (33%) patients were treated with HMA as the first line therapy and were included in the study. Median age at t-MN diagnosis was 70 (IQR 64-75) years and 112 (60%) patients were male. At the time of diagnosis, 84% (n=154) and 16% (n=30) patients were classified as t-MDS and t-AML and 47% (87/184) and 46% (49/107) of the evaluable patients had complex karyotype and TP53 somatic mutations (TP53 Mut) respectively. Azacitidine (n=145, 79%) was most frequently used HMA followed by decitabine (n=39, 21%). Median survival of the whole cohort since t-MN diagnosis was 13.2 months. At the time of analysis further treatment details were available for 78 patients and outcome of these patients were compared with primary MDS (p-MDS) and oligoblastic AML managed at the same institute. Completion of six-cycles of HMA (50% vs. 62%; P=0.07) and overall response rate (47 vs. 50%, P=0.22) was not significantly different between t-MN and p-MDS. However, median OS of t-MN was significantly poor compared to p-MDS (10 vs. 20 months, P=0.0004; Figure 1A). In t-MN patients treated with HMA as the first-line agent, median OS was significantly shorter in t-AML compared to t-MDS (7 vs.10 months, P=0.04; Figure 1B). Median OS was significantly shorter in patients with TP53 Mut and complex karyotype (Figure 1C-D). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, t-AML and complex karyotype were independently associated with poor outcome. Conclusion: This study demonstrates significantly poor outcome of t-MN patients treated with HMA therapy as first line. The outcome is particularly poor in t-AML and patients with complex karyotype and TP53 Mut. Hence there is urgent need for clinical trials of novel therapies for t-MN. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sharplin: Kite Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Travel Support. Ross: Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hiwase: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Hyperdiploid Complex Karyotype: A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Introduction: Cytogenetics remains one of the most important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, even for outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Complex karyotype (CK) constitutes a cytogenetic category with a very adverse prognosis in this setting. However, CK is a heterogenous and loosely defined category which comprises a high diversity of cytogenetic subtypes, which is highly enriched with specific cytogenetic subtypes characterized by losses of chromosomal material at critical regions known to confer a poor prognosis per se, such as monosomal karyotype, del(7q)/-7, del(5q)/-5 or abnormalities leading to 17p region loss. On the contrary, rare AML cases characterized with only multiple numerical abnormalities known as pure hyperdiploid karyotype (HDK), have a controversial prognosis. We hypothesized that pure complex HDK AML has a distinct and much better prognosis after allo-HCT compared to non-HDK, CK AML. Methods: We selected from the EBMT registry adult patients with AML and a full cytogenetic report. HDK was defined by the presence of 49 chromosomes or more. Patients were then stratified by pure HDK (pHDK) and HDK with other cytogenetic abnormalities (HDK+), characterized by HDK and the presence of a prognostic-defining cytogenetic abnormality such as del(5q)/-5, del(7q)/-7, del(17p)/-17/i(17q), inv(3q21-26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) or t(9;22). We included only first allo-HCT from a sibling or unrelated donor (UD) performed between 2000 and 2018. Results: A total of 236 patients were identified as having HDK. There were 95 pHDK and 141 HDK+. Median age at transplantation was 53 years (range, 18-74) and median follow-up was 43 months (range, 35-56). A diagnosis of secondary AML was reported in 48 patients (20%). At the time of allo-HCT, 180 patients (76%) were in first remission (CR1), and 56 were beyond CR1 (24%). Eighty-five (39%) patients received an allo-HCT from a sibling donor, with more matched unrelated donors (MUD) in HDK+ patients (p=0.02). Most patients (70%) had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of more than 90% at the time of transplantation. A myeloablative conditioning regimen was administered in 46% of the patients. In vivo T-cell depletion was part of the regimen in 66% of the patients. The most frequent trisomies were trisomy 8, 21, 13, and 22. The 2-year probability of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 26% for the entire cohort. The 2-year probability of LFS was 50% for pHDK and 31% for HDK+ (p=0.003). The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) was 57% for pHDK and 36% for HDK+ (p=0.007). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was 22% for pHDK and 44% for HDK+ (p=0.001) (Figure 1). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and chronic GvHD was 34% and 33%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Finally, the 2-year probability of GvHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 36% for pHDK and 21% for HDK+ (p=0.01). On multivariate analysis, pHDK remained associated with significantly better LFS, OS and GRFS and higher RI (all p-values<0.004). Age was associated with lower OS (p=0.05). Being in remission at the time of allo-HCT was associated with better LFS, OS and GRFS, and lower NRM and RI (all p-values<0.02). Secondary AML, donor type, KPS, and conditioning regimen intensity were not associated with any outcome in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: AML with pHDK has a better outcome after allo-HCT in terms of RI, LFS, OS and GRFS. pHDK AML constitutes probably a distinct cytogenetic entity from HDK+ or other non-hyperdiploid CK AML. CK remains a strong indication for allo-HCT, but the type of abnormalities included in CK significantly influences the outcome and should guide how to manage patients after allo-HCT in terms of immunosuppression withdrawal or prophylactic/preemptive post-transplant interventions such as use of hypomethylating agents or donor lymphocyte infusions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Ganser: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Socie: Alexion: Research Funding. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Esteve: Jazz: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.

TP53 Mutations, Deletions, and CN-LOH: Comparison of TP53 single Hit and Double Hit Events and Their Impact on Prognosis in Hematological Malignancies

Background: TP53 is altered in ~50% of human cancers. Alterations mainly include mutations and/or deletions, but also copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) was reported. Frequently, both TP53 alleles are altered (by mutation + deletion, mutation + CN-LOH or ≥2 mutations), leading to a "double hit" event. Aim: Analysis of TP53 aberrations using WGS in 4646 cases with 29 different hematological malignancies, comparing (1) the frequencies of TP53 alterations, (2) occurrence of single hit vs. double hit, (3) correlation with complex karyotype and (4) impact on survival. Methods: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for all 4,646 patients (median coverage 100x). 151bp paired-end reads were generated on NovaSeq 6000 and HiSeqX machines (Illumina, San Diego, CA). As no sample specific normal tissue was available, a so-called Tumor/Unmatched normal (TUN) workflow was used to reduce technical artefacts and germline calls. All reported p-values are two-sided and were considered significant at p<0.05. Results: In the total cohort of 4,646 cases, in 582 (13%) at least one alteration (alt) involving TP53 was detected (comprising mutations (mut), deletions (del) and CN-LOH (LOH); Fig 1A,B). Cases were categorized as follows: cases with (1) 1 TP53 mut only (n=166), (2) del only (n=100), (3) LOH only (n=15), constituting the single hit events. Further, (4) cases with mut+del (might include 1 or more mut, n=211), cases with mut+LOH (≥1 mut, n=41), cases with ≥2 mut only (without del or LOH, n=49), resulting in double hit events (Fig 1B). Regarding the respective entities, high frequencies of TP53 alt were mainly detected in lymphoid malignancies (e.g. HGBL, MPAL, vHZL, MZL, MCL), whereas they were infrequent or absent in many myeloid malignancies (e.g. aCML, MPN, CMML, CML, MLN_eo; Fig 1A). For further analysis, only entities in which >10 cases showed TP53 alt events were used. Comparison of single hit vs. double hit revealed that T-NHL, MM, MPN and MDS predominantly showed a single hit, whereas the double hit was frequent in MPAL, MZL, MDS/MPN-U, CLL and MCL cases (Fig 1A). However, the type of double hit differed between myeloid and lymphoid malignancies, as myeloid neoplasms showed a high frequency of cases with ≥2 mut only, whereas in many lymphoid malignancies the double hit was predominantly generated by mut+del (Fig 1A,C). All TP53-associated events (mut, del, LOH and the respective combinations) were found to be associated with a complex karyotype in the total cohort (LOH: 14% complex karyotype in cases without TP53 alt vs. 59% in cases with TP53 alt, p<0.001). This association was also detected for most of the selected entities (exceptions: MZL, T-NHL). Regarding overall survival (OS), in the total cohort, all events involving TP53 impact on OS (TP53 alt: 22 months vs. 84 months, p<0.001; TP53 mut: 20 vs. 82 months, p<0.001; TP53 del: 20 vs. 79 months, p<0.001; TP53 LOH: 20 vs. 75 months, p<0.001). Moreover, although the single hit already impacts on OS, the double hit leads to an even inferior outcome (no hit vs. single hit vs. double hit: 84 vs. 39 vs. 14 months, p<0.001). In the selected entities, an influence of TP53 alt on OS was detected for all malignancies except HGBL, MZL and T-NHL, for which also the presence of a double hit did not show an effect on OS. For the majority of the other entities, the double hit leads to a shorter OS than the single hit (as observed for the total cohort), with the exceptions of MCL and MPAL: in these entities, the single hit did not impact on OS, but only a double hit is associated with inferior outcome. Conclusions: (1) Frequency of TP53 alterations and of double hit vs. single hit differs markedly between entities. (2) The kind of TP53 complexity differs between both lineages (double hit in myeloid neoplasms: often ≥2 mut only; in lymphoid malignancies: predominantly mut+del). (3) In 7% (41/582) of cases with TP53 alt, CN-LOH transforms a single hit into a double hit. (4) In the total cohort and in the majority of selected entities (except MZL and T-NHL), TP53 alt are associated with complex karyotype. (5) In the total cohort, all events involving TP53 impact on OS; cases with double hit show an inferior outcome compared to single hit. (6) Regarding OS, the selected entities can be divided into three categories: (i) no influence of TP53 alt (HGBL, MZL, T-NHL); (ii) double hit required for impact on OS (MCL, MPAL); (iii) influence of both single hit and double hit with inferior outcome of double hit (all other). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kern: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership.

TP53 mutation in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

Objectives TP53 mutation is found frequently in therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/ myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), AML and MDS patients with monosomy or complex karyotype. However, the prevalence and treatment outcome in TP53 mutated AML/MDS patients in Asian population are scarce. We therefore conducted this study to analyze the prevalence and the treatment outcomes of TP53 mutation in AML and MDS-EB patients. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed AML and MDS-EB were recruited, extraction of deoxyribonucleic acid from bone marrow samples were done and then performing TP53 mutation analysis, using MassArray® System (Agena Bioscience, CA, USA). Results A total of 132 AML/MDS patients were recruited, patients with de novo AML, secondary AML, MDS-EB1, MDS-EB2 and T-AML/MDS were seen in 66, 13, 9, 9 and 3%, respectively. TP53 mutation was found in 14 patients (10.6%), and prevalence of TP53 mutation in T-AML/MDS, secondary AML, de novo AML and MDS-EB patients were 50, 17.6, 9.2 and 8%, respectively. Three patients had double heterozygous TP53 mutation. Mutated TP53 was significantly detected in patients with monosomy and complex chromosome. Common TP53 mutation were R290C, T220C, A249S and V31I which V31I mutation was reported only in Taiwanese patients. Most variant allele frequency (VAF) of TP53 mutation in the study were greater than 40%. Three year-overall survival (OS) in the whole population was 22%, 3y-OS in AML and MDS-EB patients were 22 and 27%, respectively. The 1y-OS in patients with TP53-mutant AML/MDS were shorter than that in TP53 wild-type patients, 14% versus 50%, P = 0.001. In multivariate analysis, factors affecting OS in 132 AML/MDS patients was mutant TP53 (P = 0.023, HR = 1.20–7.02), whereas, WBC count> 100,000/μL (P = 0.004, HR = 1.32–4.16) and complex karyotype (P = 0.038, HR = 1.07–9.78) were associated with shorter OS in AML patients. Discussion In this study, the prevalence of TP53 mutation in de novo AML and MDS-EB patients were low but it had impact on survival. Patients with monosomy or complex karyotype had more frequent TP53 mutation.