HIV-Related Internalized Stigma and Patient Health Engagement Model in an Italian Cohort of People Living With HIV

The care engagement of people living with HIV (PLWH) measured with the patient health engagement (PHE) model and its association with HIV-related internalized stigma are not well established. Indeed, currently there are no data yet about the engagement of PLWH measured with the PHE model. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of HIV-related internalized stigma on care engagement and mental health and to fill the lack of data on PHE model applied to PLWH. We found that the internalized stigma score was significantly higher for PLWH ( n=82) in worse care engagement phase and both higher internalized stigma scores and worse engagement were associated to major depression symptoms. In conclusion, our findings describe for the first time the engagement in care of PLWH measured with PHE and highlight the importance of PLWH support to find strategies to cope stigma-related stress and optimize their care engagement.

Resident and Family Engagement in Care Conferences: Important Processes and Supporting Strategies

Self-determination is a core value of person-centered care. Research has shown residents and families want to be involved in decisions about care. Care conferences are one existing structure where residents and families can engage in decision-making about care goals. However, there are few tools to support effective engagement. To inform future tool development, this study sought to understand what resident and family stakeholders value about engaging in care conferences. In virtual meetings, 16 stakeholders identified 3 key areas of engagement: being informed about health/well-being, influencing care goals, and advocating for needs. They indicated current approaches do not achieve these engagement goals, which is particularly problematic during COVID when families cannot engage in person. Stakeholders offered ideas for supporting engagement such as provision of data before the conference. The study has implications for individualizing care conferences and encouraging resident and family engagement in decision-making both during and beyond COVID.

Engagement in Assisted Living During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Promising Practices

The “lockdown” in assisted living (AL) from the COVID-19 pandemic has physically isolated residents from the outside world and affected resident and family engagement in care. This presentation outlines a content analysis of qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews conducted from April 2020 with 105 AL staff, residents, and family members exploring COVID-19 experience/restrictions and engagement during the pandemic. Analysis revealed AL families and residents expressed difficulties with COVID-19 visiting and distancing restrictions, reduced family visitations, discontinuity of care, and worries about COVID-19 infection. Staff/administrators expressed uncertainty about lack of knowledge about COVID-19, worries about transmission, and if staff will get exposed outside of work. Promising factors include enhanced communication between staff and families regarding care, improved virtual communication, creative strategies to socially engage residents, and improved infection control practices and staff training. The presentation discusses the implications of the findings for future research, policy, and practice.

52. PrEP Adherence and Discontinuation at a Pharmacy-Supported PrEP Program in Atlanta, GA

Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective biomedical strategy to decrease Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) acquisition. Effectiveness of oral PrEP is linked to medication adherence. In 2018, Grady Health System (GHS) launched a PrEP program to increase PrEP access among un- and underinsured individuals living in metro Atlanta, Georgia. The purpose of this study is to determine PrEP medication adherence, PrEP discontinuation rates, and associated individual factors of patients enrolled during the first 18 months of the program’s implementation. Methods A single-center, retrospective chart review was conducted on patients enrolled in the GHS PrEP program between June 1, 2018 and February 29, 2020 who received more than one monthly PrEP prescription. Adherence was estimated using the medication possession ratio (MPR). The primary outcome was mean adherence to PrEP. Secondary outcomes include rate of high percent adherence (MPR > 80%), median time of engagement in care, PrEP discontinuation rates, rates of PrEP re-engagement, and individual factors associated with PrEP discontinuation and low adherence. Results This study included 154 patients, 70.8% of them were Black, 62.3% were cisgender men, 59.1% were uninsured, and the mean age was 34. The majority of patients identified as men who have sex with men (51.9%). Mean PrEP adherence was 89.2%; 77.3% of patients demonstrated a high rate of adherence. No individual or social factors were associated with low adherence, but younger age was associated with higher rates of PrEP discontinuation (p< 0.0061). At the end of the follow up period on October 30, 2020, 53.8% of patients were active in the program and 12.7% of those who discontinued had re-engaged with the program. The average length of program engagement was 9.8 months. Table 1. Baseline socio-demographic characteristics (N=154) Table 2. PrEP Adherence and Discontinuation at the GHS PrEP Program from 2018 to 2020 (N=154) Table 4. Multivariate analysis of individual factors associated with PrEP discontinuation and low adherence Conclusion Mean PrEP adherence at a safety net PrEP program in Atlanta was high and PrEP discontinuation rates were comparable to other PrEP clinics nationwide. We found no association with individual factors previously linked to lower adherence, including Black race, younger age, and insurance status. Program-related factors that may have impacted these findings need to be investigated. Other future areas of research include strategies to optimize engagement in care in younger patients. Disclosures Bradley L. Smith, Pharm.D., AAHIVP, Gilead Sciences, Inc (Advisor or Review Panel member)

869. A Qualitative Review of Social Barriers Impeding Retention in HIV Care at a Ryan White Clinic

Background Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America aims to decrease new HIV diagnoses 75% by 2025 and 90% by 2030. To achieve this, we identified patients unable to achieve viral suppression with social-behavioral needs deemed ‘high-hanging fruit.’ Via extensive outreach efforts and creation of shared problem solving, we pursued the goals of rapid and effective treatment leading to viral suppression and prevention of HIV transmission. We (1) exhausted all avenues of outreach to re-engage patients in HIV care and (2) identified personal or social characteristics related to difficulties in visit retention and achieving viral suppression. Methods Of 446 Ryan White-eligible patients seen in an urban, academic medical center, 46 did not achieve and/or maintain viral suppression, and qualified for the study. We conducted a mixed methods survey comprised of both multiple choice and open-ended questions to ascertain what barriers patients face to continuous engagement in care and to achieving viral suppression. We developed a re-engagement outreach cycle which included: text messages and phone calls, electronic messages via patient portal or email, phone call to pharmacy to cross-check contact information, outreach to patients’ emergency contact, and sending a letter by mail. Results Of 46 participants, 32 were reached and 14 were not found. Sixteen re-engaged in care and of these, 14 completed the survey (see Figure). Those who completed the survey noted the following barriers to care: poor mental health, financial issues, problems committing to an appointment due to work/family/transportation, and COVID-19. Out of all 46 participants, the 14 who were not found had an overall a higher index of chaos. This index of chaos included, but was not limited to: homelessness, IV drug use, domestic violence, and stigma. Outreach to re-engage in HIV care A. Participants in study, B. Outreach outcomes, C. Common survey themes Conclusion Intensive efforts are required to re-engage patients, counsel on adherence, and achieve viral suppression. The reasons for lack of engagement in care are real and challenging. Multiple cycles of continuous outreach serve to establish trust, address barriers, and connect to HIV care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Offering ART refill through community health workers versus clinic-based follow-up after home-based same-day ART initiation in rural Lesotho: The VIBRA cluster-randomized clinical trial

Background Community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensing by lay workers is an important differentiated service delivery model in sub-Sahara Africa. However, patients new in care are generally excluded from such models. Home-based same-day ART initiation is becoming widespread practice, but linkage to the clinic is challenging. The pragmatic VIBRA (Village-Based Refill of ART) trial compared ART refill by existing lay village health workers (VHWs) versus clinic-based refill after home-based same-day ART initiation. Methods and findings The VIBRA trial is a cluster-randomized open-label clinical superiority trial conducted in 249 rural villages in the catchment areas of 20 health facilities in 2 districts (Butha-Buthe and Mokhotlong) in Lesotho. In villages (clusters) randomized to the intervention arm, individuals found to be HIV-positive during a door-to-door HIV testing campaign were offered same-day ART initiation with the option of refill by VHWs. The trained VHWs dispensed drugs and scheduled clinic visits for viral load measurement at 6 and 12 months. In villages randomized to the control arm, participants were offered same-day ART initiation with clinic-based ART refill. The primary outcome was 12-month viral suppression. Secondary endpoints included linkage and 12-month engagement in care. Analyses were intention-to-treat. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03630549). From 16 August 2018 until 28 May 2019, 118 individuals from 108 households in 57 clusters in the intervention arm, and 139 individuals from 130 households in 60 clusters in the control arm, were enrolled (150 [58%] female; median age 36 years [interquartile range 30–48]; 200 [78%] newly diagnosed). In the intervention arm, 48/118 (41%) opted for VHW refill. At 12 months, 46/118 (39%) participants in the intervention arm and 64/139 (46%) in the control arm achieved viral suppression (adjusted risk difference −0.07 [95% CI −0.20 to 0.06]; p = 0.256). Arms were similar in linkage (adjusted risk difference 0.03 [−0.10 to 0.16]; p = 0.630), but engagement in care was non-significantly lower in the intervention arm (adjusted risk difference −0.12 [−0.23 to 0.003]; p = 0.058). Seven and 0 deaths occurred in the intervention and control arm, respectively. Of the intervention participants who did not opt for drug refill from the VHW at enrollment, 41/70 (59%) mentioned trust or conflict issues as the primary reason. Study limitations include a rather small sample size, 9% missing viral load measurements in the primary endpoint window, the low uptake of the VHW refill option in the intervention arm, and substantial migration among the study population. Conclusions The offer of village-based ART refill after same-day initiation led to similar outcomes as clinic-based refill. The intervention did not amplify the effect of home-based same-day ART initiation alone. The findings raise concerns about acceptance and safety of ART delivered by lay health workers after initiation in the community. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03630549).

Engagement of mental health service users and carers in care planning – Is it meaningful and adding value?

Objective: Consider whether mental health service users and carers meaningfully engage in care planning and whether care planning adds value to patient care. Conclusion: A review of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews of service users and carers identified many barriers to their meaningful engagement in care planning. No research has demonstrated any measurable benefits or positive outcomes linked to mental health care planning.