damping effects
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

366
(FIVE YEARS 57)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobo Varela Rodríguez ◽  
Juan Huang ◽  
Donald A Spong ◽  
Jiale Chen ◽  
Vincent Chan ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study is to analyze the stability of Alfven Eigenmodes (AE) in the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) plasma for steady state operations. The analysis is done using the gyro-fluid code FAR3d including the effect of the acoustic modes, EP Finite Larmor radius damping effects and multiple energetic particle populations. Two high poloidal β scenarios are studied with respect to the location of the internal transport barrier (ITB) at r/a ≈ 0.45 (case A) and r/a ≈ 0.6 (case B). Both operation scenarios show a narrow TAE gap between the inner-middle plasma region and a wide EAE gap all along the plasma radius. The AE stability of CFETR plasmas improves if the ITB is located inwards, case A, showing AEs with lower growth rates with respect to the case B. The AEs growth rate is smaller in the case A because the modes are located in the inner-middle plasma region where the stabilizing effect of the magnetic shear is stronger with respect to the case B. Multiple EP populations effects (NBI driven EP + alpha articles) are negligible for the case A, although the simulations for the case B show a stabilizing effect of the NBI EP on the n=1 BAE caused by alpha particles during the thermalization process. If the FLR damping effects are included in the simulations, the growth rate of the EAE/NAE decreases up to 70 %, particularly for n > 3 toroidal families. Low n AEs (n<6) show the largest growth rates. On the other hand, high n modes (n=6 to 15) are triggered in the frequency range of the NAE, strongly damped by the FLR effects.


Author(s):  
Alexandre Rezende Diezel ◽  
Fabrício Nogueira Correa ◽  
Murilo Augusto Vaz ◽  
Breno Pinheiro Jacob

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 7492
Author(s):  
Luchuan Ding ◽  
Ruben Van Coile ◽  
Wouter Botte ◽  
Robby Caspeele

The alternative load path method is widely used to assess the progressive collapse performance of reinforced concrete structures. As an alternative to an accurate non–linear dynamic analysis, an energy–based method (EBM) can also be adopted to approximately calculate the dynamic load–bearing capacity curve or the dynamic resistance based on a static capacity curve. However, dynamic effects cannot be explicitly taken into account in the EBM. The model uncertainty associated with the use of the EBM for evaluating the dynamic ultimate capacity of structural frames has not yet been quantified. Knowledge of this model uncertainty is however necessary when applying EBM as part of reliability calculations, for example, in relation to structural robustness quantification. Hence, this article focuses on the evaluation of the performance of the EBM and the quantification of its model uncertainty in the context of reliability–based assessments of progressive or disproportionate collapse. The influences of damping effects and different column removal scenarios are investigated. As a result, it is found that damping effects have a limited influence on the performance of the EBM. In the case of an external column removal scenario, the performance of the EBM is lower as the response is not a single deformation mode according to the results in the frequency domain. However, a good performance is found in the case of an internal column removal scenario in which the assumption of a single deformation mode is found to be sufficiently adequate. Probabilistic models for the model uncertainties related to the use of the EBM compared to direct dynamic analyses are proposed in relation to both the resistances and the associated displacements. Overall, the EBM shows to be an adequate approximation, resulting in a small bias and small standard deviation for its associated model uncertainty.


2021 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 106299
Author(s):  
Shaowu Ning ◽  
Dongyang Chu ◽  
Heng Jiang ◽  
Fengyuan Yang ◽  
Zhanli Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document