Cisplatin and Irinotecan as First-Line Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Metastatic Thymic Carcinoma: Updated Analysis

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the de facto standard treatment for metastatic or unresectable thymic carcinoma. The optimal chemotherapy regimen has not yet been determined, including whether this should be combined with a second- or third-generation anti-cancer agent. We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients with metastatic or unresectable thymic carcinoma who were treated with a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy between 2002 and 2021 (trial registration UMIN000012175). The primary endpoint was response rate according to the RECIST criteria version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity (adverse events). Some patients analyzed in this study were also included in the previous trial, which was terminated early. For this analysis, we included 18 patients with a median age of 56 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. All patients had clinical stage IVa or IVb thymic carcinoma according to the Masaoka-Koga staging system. The response rate was 44% and the disease control rate was 89%. The median PFS was 8.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7–11.6 months) and the median OS was 45.6 months (95% CI: 15.7–69.1 months). Grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity was observed in 5 patients and grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicity was observed in 3 patients. None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Thus, the combination of cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic thymic carcinoma showed efficacy and acceptable toxicity.

CTNI-58. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LAROTRECTINIB IN ADULT AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH TROPOMYOSIN RECEPTOR KINASE (TRK) FUSION-POSITIVE PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) TUMORS

BACKGROUND NTRK gene fusions are oncogenic drivers in various CNS and non-CNS tumors. Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective TRK inhibitor approved for patients with TRK fusion cancer, with a 75% objective response rate (ORR) in 206 evaluable patients with various non-CNS cancers (Hong et al, ASCO 2021). We report data on patients with TRK fusion-positive primary CNS tumors. METHODS Patients with TRK fusion-positive primary CNS tumors in 2 clinical trials (NCT02637687, NCT02576431) were identified. Objective responses were investigator-assessed. RESULTS As of July 2020, 33 patients with TRK fusion-positive primary CNS tumors were identified (19 high-grade gliomas [HGG], 8 low-grade gliomas [LGG], 2 glioneuronal tumors, 2 neuroepithelial tumors, 1 CNS neuroblastoma, 1 small round blue cell tumor). Median age was 8.9 years (range 1.3-79.0). Patients were heavily pre-treated, with 45% having ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. ORR was 30% (95% CI 16-49): 3 complete responses (all pediatric), 7 partial responses, 20 stable disease, and 3 progressive disease. ORR in patients with HGG and LGG were 26% (95% CI 9-51) and 38% (95% CI 9-76), respectively. Median time to response was 1.9 months. Responses were seen regardless of the number of prior systemic therapies. The 24-week disease control rate was 73% (95% CI 54-87). Median PFS was 18.3 months (95% CI 6.7-not estimable [NE]) and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI 16.9-NE) at a median follow-up of 16.5 months; 12-month OS rate was 85% (95% CI 71-99). Treatment duration ranged from 1.2 to 31.3+ months. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 3 patients (9%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS In patients with TRK fusion-positive CNS tumors, larotrectinib demonstrated rapid and durable responses, high disease control rate, and favorable safety regardless of age or number of prior systemic therapies.

Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study

Background Malignancies are molecularly complex and become more resistant with each line of therapy. We hypothesized that offering matched, individualized combination therapies to patients with treatment-naïve, advanced cancers would be feasible and efficacious. Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable/metastatic, poor-prognosis cancers were enrolled in a cross-institutional prospective study. Methods A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Genomic profiling (tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA) was performed in all patients, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite status assessment were performed in a subset of patients. We evaluated safety and outcomes: disease-control rate (stable disease for ≥ 6 months or partial or complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Seventy-six of 145 patients (52%) were treated, most commonly for non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers, carcinomas of unknown primary, and hepatobiliary malignancies (53% women; median age, 63 years). The median number of deleterious genomic alterations per patient was 5 (range, 0–15). Fifty-four treated patients (71%) received ≥ 1 molecularly matched therapy, demonstrating the feasibility of administering molecularly matched therapy. The Matching Score, which reflects the percentage of targeted alterations, correlated linearly with progression-free survival (R2 = 0.92; P = 0.01), and high (≥ 60%) Matching Score was an independent predictor of improved disease control rate [OR 3.31 (95% CI 1.01–10.83), P = 0.048], PFS [HR 0.55 (0.28–1.07), P = 0.08], and OS [HR 0.42 (0.21–0.85), P = 0.02]. Serious adverse event rates were similar in the unmatched and matched groups. Conclusions Personalized combination therapies targeting a majority of a patient’s molecular alterations have antitumor activity as first-line treatment. These findings underscore the feasibility and importance of using tailored N-of-1 combination therapies early in the course of lethal malignancies. Trial registration I-PREDICT (NCT02534675) was registered on August 25, 2015.

Application of Jianpi Xiaoai Recipe Combined with Cisplatin and Adriamycin in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer and Its Effect on Disease Control Rate

Objective. To explore the application of Jianpi Xiaoai recipe combined with cisplatin and Adriamycin in the treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) and its effect on the disease control rate (DCR). Methods. The data of 120 EC patients treated in People’s Hospital of Rizhao from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were equally split into experimental group and control group according to the order of admission. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy (continuous infusion of the uterine artery for 5 days before surgery, with 20 mg of cisplatin mixed with 2000 mg of normal saline and 10 mg of Adriamycin mixed with 500 ml of normal saline daily), while the experimental group was treated with Jianpi Xiaoai recipe at the same time to compare the short-term efficacy, immune function indexes, incidence of adverse reactions, and HEC-1-B (human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells) cell inhibition rates between the two groups. Results. The DCR and objective remission rate (ORR) in the experimental group were markedly higher compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). The immune function indexes after treatment were remarkably better in the experimental group than in the control group ( P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was notably lower ( P < 0.05), while the HEC-1-B inhibition rates after treatment were obviously higher ( P < 0.05). Conclusion. Jianpi Xiaoai recipe combined with cisplatin and Adriamycin can increase the HEC-1-B cell inhibition rate in EC patients, improve their immune function, reduce the possibility of adverse reactions, and enhance the therapeutic effect, which is worthy of clinical application and popularization.

151 A RANDOMIZED,OPEN CLINICAL TRIAL TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ANLOTINIB PLUS IRINOTECAN VERSUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH ESCC

The benefit of systemic treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib (AL3818) is a novel multi-target TKI, inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. A phase II trial (NCT02649361) has demonstrated that anlotinib has a durable antitumor activity with a manageable adverse event profile in refractory metastatic ESCC. This study (NCT03387904) aimed at comparing the effects and safety of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan versus Irinotecan in patients with ESCC. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, phase II trial to compare the efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan with Irinotecan in recurrent ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum or taxane-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients were adults with pathologically confirmed recurrent ESCC, and 82 patients were randomized 1:1 to Irinotecan (65 mg/m2/day 1 and day 8) with or without anlotinib (12 mg qd day 1 to 14) of a 21-day cycle till progression or intolerable. The primary endpoint is the disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary end points are objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Results Between 13/1 2019 and 20/1 2020, a total of 43 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the anlotinib plus irinotecan (n = 22) or the irinotecan group (n = 21).The mPFS was longer in trial group than in control group (89 days vs 66 days, HR = 0.447, P = 0.055). The Disease control rate (DCR) was 54.5% in trial group and 38.1% in the control group. The treatment-related adverse events (&gt;10%) were fatigue (59.1%), nausea (50.0%), decreased appetite (36.4%), hoarseness (27.3%), thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation (22.7%), diarrhea (9.1%), and decreased lymphocytes count(9.1%) in trial group. Grade 3 AEs included fatigue (4.5% vs 4.8%), nausea (4.5% vs 0%) and diarrhea (4.5% vs 0%) in two groups. Conclusion Anlotinib plus irinotecan was similarly tolerable but prolonged PFS compared to irinotecan monotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with recurrent ESCC.

The Clinicopathological Features of BRG1-deficient Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Response to Immunotherapy: A Single-center Retrospective Study

PurposeBRG1-deficient NSCLCs have been more intriguing recently for its highly aggressive clinical behavior and no effective therapies. This study characterized the clinical and pathological features of BRG1-deficient NSCLCs and investigated their response to immunotherapy.MethodsForty-seven cases with BRG1-deficient NSCLC were included. Immunohistochemical markers such as CK7, TTF-1, NapsinA, P40, HepPar-1, Ki-67, BRM, ARID1A and ARID1B were stained. Meanwhile, the PD-L1 expression level, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate of patients received immunotherapy were evaluated.ResultsThis study revealed that: (1) Patients with BRG1-deficient NSCLC have a male predominance(89.4%), smoker enrichment(76.6%) and poor prognosis(median OS: 7.0 months for advanced stage). (2) Histologically, BRG1-deficient NSCLCs presented significant morphological diversity and no lepidic pattern. Inflammatory infiltration and tumor necrosis was a prominent feature. Immunohistochemical analyses showed a distinctive uniform immunophenotype (TTF-1-/NapsinA-/CK7+) in 60.9% (28/46) of cases and HepPar-1 positive in 46.5% (20/43) of cases. BRM loss or significant reduction coexisted in 11.8% (4/34) of cases. No case (0/37) showed loss of ARID1A or ARID1B. (3) For twenty-nine patients with advanced stage, eight patients had received immunotherapy and 4 cases achieved a sustainable clinical response with the disease control rate of 50%. ICIs treated patients had better OS than those who received non-ICIs treatment settings (median OS, 27.0m versus 6.0m, p=0.02). Moreover, patients received ICIs have a median PFS of 17.0 months, while, median PFS on platinum doublet chemotherapy were only 6.0 months(p=0.04). ConclusionBRG1-deficient NSCLC showed diverse histopathological patterns and a unique immunohistochemical phenotype. ICIs–based immunotherapy was a beneficial therapy for BRG1- deficient NSCLC.

Real-world efficacy of docetaxel plus nintedanib after chemo-immunotherapy failure in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma

Aim: This real-world analysis evaluated docetaxel plus nintedanib in patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor failure, for whom treatment options are limited. Methods: Data were sourced retrospectively from seven German centers. Results: Of 93 patients, overall response rate was 41.4% (disease control rate: 75.9%). Of 57 patients given third-line docetaxel plus nintedanib, overall response rate was 50.0% (disease control rate: 82.7%). Median overall survival following third-line docetaxel plus nintedanib was 8.4 months. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of docetaxel plus nintedanib. Conclusion: To date, this was the largest retrospective, real-world analysis of docetaxel plus nintedanib after chemotherapy–immunotherapy failure, indicating that docetaxel plus nintedanib offers meaningful clinical benefits in this setting.

Neoadjuvant Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplant: A Cohort Study and Literature Review

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade is considered contraindicated in liver transplant (LT) recipients due to potentially lethal consequences of graft rejection and loss. Though post-transplant PD-1 blockade had already been reported, pre-transplant use of PD-1 blockade has not been thoroughly investigated. This study explores the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after registration on the waiting list. Seven transplant recipients who underwent neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with lenvatinib and subsequent LT were evaluated. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 71% and 85% according to the mRECIST criteria. Additionally, a literature review contained 29 patients were conducted to summarize the PD-1 blockade in LT for HCC. Twenty-two LT recipients used PD-1 inhibitors for recurrent HCC. 9.1% (2/22) and 4.5% (1/22) recipients achieved complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), respectively; 40.9% (9/22) recipients had progressive disease (PD). Allograft rejection occurred in 45% of patients. In total, seven patients from our center and three from the literature used pretransplant anti-PD-1 antibodies, eight patients (80%) had a PR, and the disease control rate was 100%. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) incidence was 30% (3 in 10 patients), two patients died because of BPAR. This indicated that neoadjuvant PD-1-targeted immunotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) exhibited promising efficacy with tolerable mortality in transplant recipients under close clinical monitoring.

Outcomes after retreatment with MAPK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients

Background: When patients with advanced melanoma progress after MAPK inhibitor (MAPKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, they can either undergo chemotherapy or rechallenge with previously used treatments. Methods: The outcomes of 48 patients retreated with MAPKIs and 50 patients retreated with ICIs following progression were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Upon retreatment with MAPKIs, the disease control rate was 60%. Univariate analysis of possible risk factors associated with short progression-free survival upon MAPKI treatment showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase to be associated with decreased progression-free survival. Disease control rate after ICI retreatment was 24%. Melanoma of unknown primary was associated with prolonged progression-free survival upon ICI retreatment. Conclusion: Retreatment with MAPKIs or ICIs is a feasible option for patients with advanced melanoma.

Transarterial chemoembolization alone or followed by bevacizumab for treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Aims: Bevacizumab (B) in association with systemic chemotherapy is commonly used for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. The aim of this study was to monitor tumor response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + B compared with TACE alone and to correlate the results with KRAS mutational status. Patients & methods: This was an observational multicentric case–control study (NCT03732235) on the efficacy and safety of B administered after TACE. Results: The disease control rate was significantly higher for the TACE + B than the TACE alone group (p < 0.001). KRAS wild-type patients had a significantly better disease control rate than those with KRAS mutations in the TACE + B group. Median OS and PFS were similar for the TACE + B and TACE groups, whereas median time to progression was significantly higher for the TACE + B group (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The combination of TACE with B may improve tumor response and delay disease progression.