scholarly journals Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain

Author(s):  
Vidya Challapalli ◽  
Ivo W Tremont-Lukats ◽  
Ewan D McNicol ◽  
Joseph Lau ◽  
Daniel B Carr
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-249
Author(s):  
Giovanni Iolascon

BACKGROUND: The role of systemic use of local anesthetics in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of systemic local anesthetics for NP. METHODS: To summarize and to discuss the rehabilitation perspective on the published Cochrane Systematic Review “Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain” by Challapalli V et al. RESULTS: The review included 30 RCTs including patients with NP treated with iv lidocaine, oral mexiletine, lidocaine and mexiletine, or oral tocainide. Low-to-moderate quality of the evidence suggest that intravenous lidocaine or oral mexiletine may slightly reduce NP vs placebo, but the efficacy of these drugs is comparable to anticonvulsants or morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic administration of local anesthetics is not supported by scientific evidence for pain relief as well as for functional improvement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000810
Author(s):  
Christopher McGovern ◽  
Tara Quasim ◽  
Kathryn Puxty ◽  
Martin Shaw ◽  
Wijnand Ng ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPruritus is a common and often distressing complication after a burn injury. The purpose of this review is to explore the efficacy of drugs classically used to treat neuropathic pain in the management of pruritus after burn injury.MethodsA systematic literature search of medical databases was conducted to find studies investigating drugs listed in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline (CG173, “neuropathic pain in adults”) for the management of pruritus after burn injury in patients of any age. Controlled studies were stratified by the drug class studied and their risk of bias before conducting meta-analysis. A narrative review of case series or observational studies was presented. Severity of pruritus at any time point, with all quantitative and qualitative measures, was included.ResultsFifteen studies were included in the final analysis, 10 investigated the use of gabapentinoids, 4 studied doxepin, and 1 local anesthetic agents. Meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that the use of gabapentinoids was associated with an improvement in mean VAS (Visual Analog Scale) 0–10 scores of 2.96 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20 to 4.73, p<0.001) when compared with placebo or antihistamine. A meta-analysis of four RCTs investigating topical doxepin showed an improvement in mean VAS scores of 1.82 (95% CI 0.55 to 3.09, p<0.001). However, when excluding two studies found to be at high risk of bias, no such improvement was found (−0.32, 95% CI −1.64 to –0.99, p=0.83).ConclusionThis study suggests that gabapentinoids are beneficial in the management of burn-related pruritus. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that doxepin is an effective treatment. Topical local anesthetic agents may be safe and beneficial, but studies are scarce.Level of evidenceSystematic review, level II.


1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-776
Author(s):  
Michael F. Murphy

Neurosurgery ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Gentili ◽  
Alan R. Hudson ◽  
R.T. Dan Hunter ◽  
David G. Kline

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document