Keeping the Conversational Score: Constraints for an Optimal Contextualist Answer?

2005 ◽  
pp. 153-172
Author(s):  
Verena Gottschling
Keyword(s):  
Just Words ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 27-49
Author(s):  
Mary Kate McGowan
Keyword(s):  

This chapter argues that conversational contributions routinely enact norms for the conversation to which they contribute. When an utterance adds to a conversation, it enacts changes to the conversational score. This is because the score tracks everything relevant to the proper assessment and development of the conversation. Moreover, since what is appropriate or permissible in the conversation depends on the score, changing the score thereby changes what is permissible in that conversation and this involves the enacting of norms. Such conversational exercitives involve an important but overlooked mechanism of verbal norm enactment.


Author(s):  
Daniel W. Harris ◽  
Daniel Fogal ◽  
Matt Moss

This introduction is both a capsule history of major work in speech-act theory and an opinionated guide to its current state, organized around five major accounts of what speech acts fundamentally are. We first consider the two classical views, on which a speech act is the kind of act it is mainly due to convention (Austin), or to intention (Grice). We then spell out three other broad approaches, which conceive of speech acts primarily in terms of their function, or as the expression of mental states, or as constituted by norms. With these five families of views laid out, we relate them in turn to the apparatus of conversational score and discourse context; to the project of speech-act taxonomy; and to the theory of force. Last, we review applications of speech-act theory to matters legal and political, and to ethically significant phenomena like silencing, derogation, and coercion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document