Brian Greenstone’s Jedi Master List for Game Optimization

2009 ◽  
pp. 99-127
Author(s):  
Brian Greenstone
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Anna Berhidi ◽  
Edit Csajbók ◽  
Lívia Vasas

Nobody doubts the importance of the scientific performance’s evaluation. At the same time its way divides the group of experts. The present study mostly deals with the models of citation-analysis based evaluation. The aim of the authors is to present the background of the best known tool – Impact factor – since, according to the authors’ experience, to the many people use without knowing it well. In addition to the „nonofficial impact factor” and Euro-factor, the most promising index-number, h-index is presented. Finally new initiation – Index Copernicus Master List – is delineated, which is suitable to rank journals. Studying different indexes the authors make a proposal and complete the method of long standing for the evaluation of scientific performance.


1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Michael W. Garbisch ◽  
Gordon J. Alexander

1981 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sterling Eisiminger
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
D. H. Williams

This introductory chapter sets out the book’s purpose, which is to provide the reader with a contextualized overview of texts that fit the qualifications of an apology, instead of operating from a master list of apologists and their works. The relatively loose definition applied to this literature makes it impossible to provide a comprehensive treatment of all such texts. While this book mentions a number of ancient writings that have been considered apologies, it also shows that they better fit the broader category of polemic that in varied ways address Christian-pagan conflicts, but are not responding to a particular threat. The remainder of the chapter discusses titles of apologies, premodern apologia, and pagans and paganism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document