Uterovaginal Prolapse

1986 ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
David Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Uterovaginal Prolapse

scholarly journals 54 Outcomes following modified manchester uterine suspension for mild uterovaginal prolapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (6) ◽  
pp. S778
Author(s):  
E. Ayati ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
K. James ◽  
M. Ortega ◽  
J. Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Uterovaginal Prolapse ◽  
Uterine Suspension

scholarly journals Improved body image after uterovaginal prolapse surgery with or without hysterectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca G. Rogers ◽  
Isuzu Meyer ◽  
Ariana L. Smith ◽  
Mary Ackenbom ◽  
Lindsey Barden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Prolapse Surgery ◽  
Uterovaginal Prolapse

scholarly journals Trends in Hysterectomy for Genital Prolapse: Rural Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CMRH.S10804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakuntala Chhabra ◽  
Manjiri Ramteke ◽  
Sonali Mehta ◽  
Nisha Bhole ◽  
Yojna Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Coming Out ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Uterovaginal Prolapse ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Genital Tract Infection ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding

The present study was conducted to investigate the trends of vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse in last 20 years by analyzing case records of affected women. During the analysis period, 4831 women underwent hysterectomy; records of 4223 (87.5%) were available. Of these, 911 (21.6%), 2.7% of 34,080 gynecological admissions, had vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse (study subjects). Eighty percent women who had vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse were over 40 years of age; however, most of these women had had the disorder for years before they presented. Only 4 (0.4%) women had not given birth, 874 (96%) women had had two or more births, and 383 (42%) had had 5 or more births. Having given birth was the major factor responsible for genital prolapse. In all, 94.2% of women presented with something coming out of the vagina.” Some women presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding or pain in abdomen as the chief complaint although they had had uterovaginal prolapse for years. There was no mortality and morbidity decreased over the years. There has been no change in the rate of vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse over the years. Surgical morbidity decreased trend, possibly because of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative precautions taken, especially preoperative treatment of urinary and genital tract infection. Attempts need to be made to have safe births and a healthy life style so as to prevent genital prolapse and in case it occurs, therapy to prevent progression so that major interventions like hysterectomy are averted. Meticulous preoperative evaluation and planned therapy help in reducing surgical morbidity, if surgery becomes essential.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. King ◽  
Helen Jefferis ◽  
Simon Jackson ◽  
Alexander G. Marfin ◽  
Natalia Price
Keyword(s):  
The Elderly ◽  
Prolapse Surgery ◽  
Uterovaginal Prolapse ◽  
Surgery In The Elderly

Abdominal sacrohysteropexy UV prolapse and preservation of reproduction.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 652-655
Author(s):  
Robina Ali ◽  
Riffat Ehsan ◽  
Ghazala Niaz ◽  
Fatima Abid
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Uterovaginal Prolapse ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Operative Recovery ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of sacrohystcopxy by determining intraoperative and post-operative complications and its effectiveness by pelvic organ prolapse recurrence on follow up. Study Design: Prospective study. Setting: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit-II DHQ Hospital PMC, Faisalabad. Period: Jan-2014 to Jan-2017. Material & Methods: Patients with uterovaginal prolapse, admitted through OPD were selected for abdominal sacrohysteropexy. Variables of study including duration of surgery, any intra-operative and post operative complications, need of intra operative blood transfusion, post operative hospital stay; recurrence of POP, number of pregnancies in 06 moths follow up were recorded. Results: During this study period, 319 patients were admitted with uterovaginal prolapse. 32 (10.03%) cases were selected for abdominal sacrohysteropexy. In these 32 patients, 03 (9.37%) were <30years of age, 21(65.62%) were between 30-35 years and 8 (25%) were between 35-40 years of age. About 2(6.25%) were unmarried, while 30(93.7%) were married. In these married women 14(43.75%) were multiparas, another 14(43.75%) were para 1 or 2, while 4(12.5%) were para 3 or more. Duration of surgery was 40-45 minutes in 31(96.87%) patients. In 28(87.5%) cases per operative blood loss was <150ml while in 4(12.5%) it was estimated to be >150ml but less than 300ml. Post operatively only 1(3.12%) case developed wound sepsis and it was the only one (3.12%) who was discharged on 7th post operative day, while rest 31(96.87%) were discharged on 3rd post operative day. No recurrence was noticed in 06 moths follow up, while 2(6.25%) patients became pregnant. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrohysteropexy is a safe and an effective treatment in terms of overall anatomical and functional outcome, complications, post operative recovery, length of hospital stay and sexual functioning, in women who desire uterine and hence fertility preservation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document