Laparoscopic Repair of a Colovesical Fistula

2008 ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ramalingam ◽  
K. Selvarajan ◽  
K. Senthil
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Colovesical Fistula

Laparoscopic Repair of Colovesical Fistula

2017 ◽  
pp. 447-452
Author(s):  
Manickam Ramalingam ◽  
K. Selvarajan ◽  
Kallappan Senthil
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Colovesical Fistula

V1219: Laparoscopic Repair of an Inferior Vena Cava Injury during a Right Partial Nephrectomy

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 392-393
Author(s):  
Fernando P. Secin ◽  
Zohar A. Dotari ◽  
Bobby Shayegan ◽  
Semra Olgac ◽  
Bertrand Guillonneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava

567: Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Children

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 184-184
Author(s):  
Lars J. Cisek ◽  
Eric A. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia In Children

V225: Laparoscopic Repair of a Renal Artery Aneurysm

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavia A. Castillo ◽  
Ivan F. Pinto ◽  
Ruben D. Ureña ◽  
Ruben Olivares ◽  
Ricardo A. Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Renal Artery ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Renal Artery Aneurysm

LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER PATCH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SURGERY

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Anil Kumar Saxena ◽  
Dr. Devi Das Verma
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Duodenal Perforation ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Duodenal Ulcers ◽  
Duration Of Operation ◽  
Repair Group

Introduction: For many surgeries for duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has become gold standard for many elective procedures such as ant reflux procedures, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in colorectal surgery. Although in the emergency setting such as in the management of perforated duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been slow and limited. Since 1990, for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been used which has been widely accepted as an effective method. Duodenal ulcer is defined as a peptic ulcer which develops in the first part of the small intestine called duodenum and usually present as a perforation of acute abdomen. In perforated duodenal symptoms as severe and sudden onset abdominal pain that is worse in right upper quadrant and epigastrium and usually followed by nausea and vomiting. In this situation there is rapid generalization of pain and in examination shows peritonitis with lack of bowel sounds. Aim: The main objective of this study is to evaluate outcome of laparoscopic surgery in comparison with conventional surgery. Material and methods: All the patients with clinically diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcers presenting within 24 hours of symptoms and undergoing surgery were included during the study period. Total 50 patients were included with age group 15-65 years. All the patients with perforated duodenal ulcers were included which go through either conventional open or laparoscopic without omental patch repair. Result: Total 50 patients were included in these studies which were divided into two group with 25 patients in each group as laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and conventional open repair group. Mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 105.4±10.4 in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group whereas mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 67.3±8.6 in conventional open repair group. Mean duration of number of doses of analgesics required in laparoscopic group and conventional open group as 9.5±1.7 and 17.2± 3.1 respectively. Out of 25 patients in each group of laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and the conventional open repair group the outcome were noted with their post operative complication as shown in table no 5 below.   In Post-operative complications 21(84%) patients in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 14(56%) patients in conventional open repair group had no complications. 4 (16%) patients in the laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 2(8%) patients in conventional open repair group showed Post-operative complications as chest infection. In the conventional open repair group  patients present with wound dehiscence and wound infection and Wound dehiscence and chest infection were 4(16%) and 5(20%) respectively whereas nil in Laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group. Conclusion: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening emergency which required urgent management for the patients. Due to the advance in duodenal ulcer perforation closure by laparoscopy it becomes popular and favorite choice. With certain criteria, laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer is safe and effective though it was associated with longer operating time and had no impact on the outcome. Hence laparoscopic closure was better in comparison to open repair for the earlier returns to normal daily activities. Keywords:  Duodenal ulcer, Laparoscopic repair, Post-operative analgesia, conventional surgery

Perforated Ulcer at the Gastrojejunostomy: Laparoscopic Repair after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1545-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Bramkamp ◽  
Markus Muller ◽  
Stefan Wildi ◽  
Pierre Clavien ◽  
Markus Weber
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Perforated Ulcer

scholarly journals Long term outcome and elasticity of a polyester mesh used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. O’Dwyer ◽  
C. Chew ◽  
H. Qandeel
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Unique Problem ◽  
Polyester Mesh

Abstract Background Repair of a ventral hernia is increasingly being performed by a laparoscopic approach despite lack of good long term follow up data on outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the long term performance of a polyester mesh and to assess its elastic properties in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Methods All patients being assessed for a ventral hernia repair between August 2011 and November 2013 were placed on a prospective database. Those undergoing laparoscopic repair with a polyester mesh were seen at clinic at one month and one year, while their electronic records were assessed at 34 months (range 24–48 months) and 104 months (range 92–116 months). In addition, CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis performed for any reason on these patients during the follow up period were reviewed by a consultant gastrointestinal radiologist. Mechanical failure testing of the mesh was also performed. Results Thirty-two of the 100 patients assessed for ventral hernia repair had a laparoscopic repair with a polyester mesh. Nineteen (59%) had CT scans performed during the follow-up period. No recurrence was recorded at 34 months, while three (9.4%) had a recurrence at 104 months. Two had central breakdown of the mesh at 81 and 90 months, while 1 presented acutely at 116 months after operation. Mesh had stretched across the defect by an average of 21% (range 5.7–40%) in nine patients. Mechanical testing showed that this mesh lost its elasticity at low forces ranging between 1.8 and 3.2 N/cm. Conclusion This study shows that late recurrence is a problem following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with polyester mesh. The mesh loses it elasticity at a low force. This combined with degradation of mesh seems the most likely cause of failure. This is unlikely to be a unique problem of polyester mesh and further long-term studies are required to better assess this operative approach to ventral hernia repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document