Distal Biceps Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 835-852
Author(s):  
John J. Fernandez
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711982731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham D. Pallante ◽  
Shawn W. O’Driscoll

Background: The hook test is a sensitive and specific tool that has been previously described for diagnosing distal biceps tendon ruptures in an efficient, cost-effective manner. However, its application in postoperative evaluations after surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures is not documented. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized that the hook test result returns to normal at some point postoperatively after distal biceps repair. This information could be used in decision making during follow-up examinations with both normal and abnormal findings. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of distal biceps repair. Between July 1, 2003, and July 1, 2016, a total of 56 patients underwent distal biceps repair and also had clear documentation of the results of the hook test during the postoperative period. Hook test results consisted of “intact,” “abnormal,” or “absent.” The timing of the return to a normal hook test result was recorded. Results: Overall, 51 of 57 (89%) repairs were documented to have the hook test result return to “intact.” The test result returned to intact by a mean of 10 weeks after surgery (range, 2 weeks to 15 months). The biceps tendon was intact according to the hook test at the 4-month follow-up in 45 of the 51 patients (88%) in whom it ultimately returned. The hook test result was abnormal in 5 repairs in 5 patients with only a short-term follow-up, ranging from 2 to 7 weeks postoperatively. One patient with an abnormal hook test result at 2 weeks postoperatively underwent revision and was confirmed to have a partial tear of the biceps insertion. His hook test result returned to intact 3 months after revision repair. Conclusion: The hook test result returns to normal in patients who undergo distal biceps repair in the primary and revision settings with adequate follow-up. The vast majority of patients have a normal hook test result by 4 months postoperatively. An abnormal hook test result at 4 months postoperatively may indicate a failed repair and should prompt further investigation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Tyson Garon ◽  
Jeffrey A. Greenberg

Orthopedics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. e931-e935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Jones ◽  
Christopher M. Jones ◽  
Mark G. Grossman

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0040
Author(s):  
Paul M. Sethi ◽  
Christine Conroy ◽  
Craig Macken ◽  
William Grant Franco ◽  
David Wei ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. e325
Author(s):  
Callista Costopoulos ◽  
Joseph A. Abboud ◽  
Matthew L. Ramsey ◽  
Charles L. Getz ◽  
Daniel Sholder ◽  
...  

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil R. Oak ◽  
John R. Lien ◽  
Alexander Brunfeldt ◽  
Jeffrey N. Lawton

Background: A fracture through the proximal radius is a theoretical concern after cortical button distal biceps fixation in an active patient. The permanent, nonossified cortical defect and medullary tunnel is at risk during a fall eliciting rotational and compressive forces. We hypothesized that during simulated torsion and compression, in comparison with unaltered specimens, the cortical button distal biceps repair model would have decreased torsional and compressive strength and would fracture in the vicinity of the bicipital tuberosity bone tunnel. Methods: Sixteen fourth-generation composite radius Sawbones models were used in this controlled laboratory study. A bone tunnel was created through the bicipital tuberosity to mimic the exact bone tunnel, 8 mm near cortex and 3.2 mm far cortex, made for the BicepsButton distal biceps tendon repair. The radius was then prepared and mounted on either a torsional or compression testing device and compared with undrilled control specimens. Results: Compression tests resulted in average failure loads of 9015.2 N in controls versus 8253.25 N in drilled specimens ( P = .074). Torsional testing resulted in an average failure torque of 27.3 Nm in controls and 19.3 Nm in drilled specimens ( P = .024). Average fracture angle was 35.1° in controls versus 21.1° in drilled. Gross fracture patterns were similar in compression testing; however, in torsional testing all fractures occurred through the bone tunnel in the drilled group. Conclusion: There are weaknesses in the vicinity of the bone tunnel in the proximal radius during biomechanical stress testing which may not be clinically relevant in nature. Clinical Relevance: In cortical button fixation, distal biceps repairs creates a permanent, nonossified cortical defect with tendon interposed in the bone tunnel, which can alter the biomechanical properties of the proximal radius during compressive and torsional loading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document