How to Teach Total Knee Reconstruction Using Computer-Assisted Navigation

Author(s):  
S. David Stulberg
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84
Author(s):  
Leelasestaporn C ◽  
Thuwapitchayanant M ◽  
Sirithanapipat P ◽  
Sa-ngasoongsong P ◽  
Ruengsilsuwit P

SICOT-J ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Deep ◽  
Shivakumar Shankar ◽  
Ashish Mahendra

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Restrepo ◽  
William J. Hozack ◽  
Fabio Orozco ◽  
Javad Parvizi

Joints ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 090-094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Denti ◽  
Francesco Soldati ◽  
Francesca Bartolucci ◽  
Emanuela Morenghi ◽  
Laura De Girolamo ◽  
...  

Purpose The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA (n = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA (n = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them. Conclusion Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanner C. Clark ◽  
Frank H. Schmidt

Background. Since the introduction of robot-assisted navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there has been little research conducted examining the efficiency and accuracy of the system compared to computer-assisted navigation systems. Objective. To compare the efficiency and accuracy of Praxim robot-assisted navigation (RAN) and Stryker computer-assisted navigation (CAN) in primary TKA. Methods. This was a retrospective study consisting of 52 patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing RAN and 29 patients utilizing CAN. The primary outcome measure was navigation time. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative final mechanical axis alignment, intraoperative robot-assisted bone cut accuracy, tourniquet time, and hospitalization length. Results. RAN navigation times were, on average, 9.0 minutes shorter compared to CAN after adjustment. The average absolute intraoperative malalignment was 0.5° less in the RAN procedures compared to the CAN procedures after adjustment. Patients in the RAN group tended to be discharged 0.6 days earlier compared to patients in the CAN group after adjustment. Conclusions. Among patients undergoing TKA, there was decreased navigation time, decreased final malalignment, and decreased hospitalization length associated with the use of RAN when compared to CAN independent of age, BMI, and pre-replacement alignment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document