Milnor's $$\bar \mu $$ -invariant and 2-height of reducible plane curves

1986 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-472
Author(s):  
Kunio Murasugi
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayasu Kuwata


2014 ◽  
Vol 195 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Virginia Catalisano ◽  
Anthony V. Geramita ◽  
Alessandro Gimigliano ◽  
Yong-Su Shin


1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Sumners ◽  
J. M. Woods
Keyword(s):  


1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru IITAKA
Keyword(s):  




Author(s):  
Jan Stevens

AbstractWe discuss a problem of Arnold, whether every function is stably equivalent to one which is non-degenerate for its Newton diagram. We argue that the answer is negative. We describe a method to make functions non-degenerate after stabilisation and give examples of singularities where this method does not work. We conjecture that they are in fact stably degenerate, that is not stably equivalent to non-degenerate functions.We review the various non-degeneracy concepts in the literature. For finite characteristic, we conjecture that there are no wild vanishing cycles for non-degenerate singularities. This implies that the simplest example of singularities with finite Milnor number, $$x^p+x^q$$ x p + x q in characteristic p, is not stably equivalent to a non-degenerate function. We argue that irreducible plane curves with an arbitrary number of Puiseux pairs (in characteristic zero) are stably non-degenerate. As the stabilisation involves many variables, it becomes very difficult to determine the Newton diagram in general, but the form of the equations indicates that the defining functions are non-degenerate.



2021 ◽  
Vol 280 (8) ◽  
pp. 108931
Author(s):  
Laiyuan Gao ◽  
Shengliang Pan ◽  
Dong-Ho Tsai


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document