Classification of epimorphisms of fundamental groups of surfaces onto free groups

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 736-742
Author(s):  
R. I. Grigorchuk ◽  
P. F. Kurchanov
2008 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 1271-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Corlette ◽  
Carlos Simpson

AbstractSuppose that X is a smooth quasiprojective variety over ℂ and ρ:π1(X,x)→SL(2,ℂ) is a Zariski-dense representation with quasiunipotent monodromy at infinity. Then ρ factors through a map X→Y with Y either a Deligne–Mumford (DM) curve or a Shimura modular stack.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 189-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREG FRIEDMAN

The classical knot groups are the fundamental groups of the complements of smooth or piecewise-linear (PL) locally-flat knots. For PL knots that are not locally-flat, there is a pair of interesting groups to study: the fundamental group of the knot complement and that of the complement of the "boundary knot" that occurs around the singular set, the set of points at which the embedding is not locally-flat. If a knot has only point singularities, this is equivalent to studying the groups of a PL locally-flat disk knot and its boundary sphere knot; in this case, we obtain a complete classification of all such group pairs in dimension ≥6. For more general knots, we also obtain complete classifications of these group pairs under certain restrictions on the singularities. Finally, we use spinning constructions to realize further examples of boundary knot groups.


2006 ◽  
Vol 196 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Belegradek ◽  
Vitali Kapovitch
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 457-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnese Ilaria Telloni

We construct a family of compact hyperbolic 3-manifolds with totally geodesic boundary, depending on three integer parameters. Then we determine geometric presentations of the fundamental groups of these manifolds and prove that they are cyclic coverings of the 3-ball branched along a specified tangle with two components. Finally, we give a classification of these manifolds up to homeomorphism (resp., isometry), and determine their isometry groups.


2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 555-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Fine ◽  
Miriam Hahn ◽  
Alexander Hulpke ◽  
Volkmar große Rebel ◽  
Gerhard Rosenberger ◽  
...  

A generalized tetrahedron group is defined to be a group admitting a presentation [Formula: see text] where l, m, n, p, q, r ≥ 2, each Wi(a,b) is a cyclically reduced word involving both a and b. These groups appear in many contexts, not least as fundamental groups of certain hyperbolic orbifolds or as subgroups of generalized triangle groups. In this paper, we build on previous work to give a complete classification of all finite generalized tetrahedron groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Williams

Abstract The class of connected Labelled Oriented Graph (LOG) groups coincides with the class of fundamental groups of complements of closed, orientable 2-manifolds embedded in {S^{4}} , and so contains all knot groups. We investigate when Campbell and Robertson’s generalized Fibonacci groups {H(r,n,s)} are connected LOG groups. In doing so, we use the theory of circulant matrices to calculate the Betti numbers of their abelianizations. We give an almost complete classification of the groups {H(r,n,s)} that are connected LOG groups. All torus knot groups and the infinite cyclic group arise and we conjecture that these are the only possibilities. As a corollary we show that {H(r,n,s)} is a 2-generator knot group if and only if it is a torus knot group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document