Titration of Limited Hold to Comparison in Conditional Discrimination Training and Stimulus Equivalence Testing

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Arntzen ◽  
Silje Haugland
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Stimulus Equivalence ◽  
Equivalence Testing ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training ◽  
Limited Hold

Effects of Prior Conditional Discrimination Training, Symmetry, Transitivity, and Equivalence Testing on the Emergence of New Equivalence Classes

2000 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanny Fields ◽  
Antonios Varelas ◽  
Kenneth F. Reeve ◽  
James Belanich ◽  
Priya Wadhwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Equivalence Classes ◽  
Equivalence Testing ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training

scholarly journals Using Stimulus-Equivalence Technology to Teach Skills About Nutritional Content

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-485
Author(s):  
Erik Arntzen ◽  
Jon Magnus Eilertsen
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Stimulus Equivalence ◽  
Nutritional Content ◽  
Conditional Discriminations ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training ◽  
Food Items ◽  
Adult Participants ◽  
Equivalence Class Formation ◽  
Sorting Test

Abstract Twenty-two adult participants, assigned to three conditions, were trained nutrition knowledge (i.e., carbohydrate values) for different food items. In a stimulus sorting test, the participants were asked to sort stimuli (names of food items) into one of three different ranges of carbohydrate values ("less than 20", "20–40", "more than 40" gram per 100 gram). Conditional-discrimination training and testing followed the sorting test, and finally, a postclass formation sorting test of the stimuli used in the conditional-discrimination training. The conditional-discrimination training used tailored stimuli, that is, the food items that each of the participants categorized incorrectly in the sorting test. Participants exposed to Conditions 1 and 2 were trained on six conditional discriminations and tested for the formation of three 3-member classes. Conditions 2 and 3 had a “don’t know” option together with the three different ranges of carbohydrate values in the sorting for tailoring the stimuli. Participants exposed to Condition 3 trained were trained on 12 conditional discriminations and tested for the formation of three 5-member classes. The main findings showed that all but one of the participants responded correctly on at least one test for equivalence class formation and sorted the stimuli correctly in the postclass formation sorting test.

A Comparison of Error-Correction Procedures Within Audio–Visual Conditional Discrimination Training

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-543
Author(s):  
James W. Moore ◽  
Kayla Russo ◽  
Angelina Gilfeather ◽  
Heather M. Whipple ◽  
Greg Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training ◽  
Error Correction Procedures

scholarly journals A FURTHER EVALUATION OF PICTURE PROMPTS DURING AUDITORY-VISUAL CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 737-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte L. Carp ◽  
Sean P. Peterson ◽  
Amber J. Arkel ◽  
Anna I. Petursdottir ◽  
Einar T. Ingvarsson
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training ◽  
Picture Prompts

Cross-modal Transfer of Conditional Discrimination Training in Monkeys

Nature ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 210 (5031) ◽  
pp. 117-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. ETTLINGER ◽  
C. B. BLAKEMORE
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training

scholarly journals Conditional discrimination training and peak shifts in the pigeon

1971 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Rudolph ◽  
R. Van Houten ◽  
J. Maddox
Keyword(s):  
Discrimination Training ◽  
Conditional Discrimination ◽  
Conditional Discrimination Training
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document