Comparison of two cochlear implantation techniques and their effects on the preservation of residual hearing. Is the surgical approach of any importance?

2013 ◽  
Vol 271 (5) ◽  
pp. 997-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. F. Postelmans ◽  
R. J. Stokroos ◽  
E. van Spronsen ◽  
W. Grolman ◽  
R. A. Tange ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Bridget Copson ◽  
Sudanthi Wijewickrema ◽  
Xingjun Ma ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Jean-Marc Gerard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Simone Schaefer ◽  
Maryam Sahwan ◽  
Aleksandra Metryka ◽  
Karolina Kluk ◽  
Iain A. Bruce

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Sun A Han ◽  
Hyunjun Woo ◽  
yung-Whan Suh ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Honeder ◽  
Lukas David Landegger ◽  
Elisabeth Engleder ◽  
Franz Gabor ◽  
Roberto Plasenzotti ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. P267-P268
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Shugert Willingham ◽  
Spiros Manolidis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Irving ◽  
L. Gillespie ◽  
R. Richardson ◽  
D. Rowe ◽  
J. B. Fallon ◽  
...  

Cochlear implants have provided hearing to hundreds of thousands of profoundly deaf people around the world. Recently, the eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation have been relaxed to include individuals who have some useful residual hearing. These recipients receive inputs from both electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). Implant recipients who can combine these hearing modalities demonstrate pronounced benefit in speech perception, listening in background noise, and music appreciation over implant recipients that rely on electrical stimulation alone. The mechanisms bestowing this benefit are unknown, but it is likely that interaction of the electric and acoustic signals in the auditory pathway plays a role. Protection of residual hearing both during and following cochlear implantation is critical for EAS. A number of surgical refinements have been implemented to protect residual hearing, and the development of hearing-protective drug and gene therapies is promising for EAS recipients. This review outlines the current field of EAS, with a focus on interactions that are observed between these modalities in animal models. It also outlines current trends in EAS surgery and gives an overview of the drug and gene therapies that are clinically translatable and may one day provide protection of residual hearing for cochlear implant recipients.


Author(s):  
E.K.S. Leung ◽  
T.K.C. Wong ◽  
M.C.F. Tong ◽  
C.A. van Hasselt

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Yawn ◽  
Brendan P. O’Connell ◽  
Robert T. Dwyer ◽  
Linsey W. Sunderhaus ◽  
Susan Reynolds ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. James ◽  
Hayden Eastwood ◽  
Rachael T. Richardson ◽  
Stephen J. O’Leary

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document