scholarly journals Life cycle assessment with primary data on heavy rare earth oxides from ion-adsorption clays

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1643-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huijing Deng ◽  
Alissa Kendall
Procedia CIRP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Mariano Lima ◽  
Giancarlo Alfonso Lovon-Canchumani ◽  
Michel Sampaio ◽  
Ligia Marcela Tarazona-Alvarado

2020 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 104675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn Bailey ◽  
P. James Joyce ◽  
Dieuwertje Schrijvers ◽  
Rita Schulze ◽  
Anne Marie Sylvestre ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 753-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Schulze ◽  
Francoise Lartigue-Peyrou ◽  
Jiawen Ding ◽  
Liselotte Schebek ◽  
Matthias Buchert

1988 ◽  
Vol 28-30 ◽  
pp. 566-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keao Hu ◽  
Chunhua Chen ◽  
Dingkun Peng ◽  
Guangyao Meng

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1317-1327
Author(s):  
Giovanni Dolci ◽  
Lucia Rigamonti ◽  
Mario Grosso

The organic fraction (mainly food waste) is typically the most abundant of the separately collected waste streams. The research aims at investigating the influence of different types of collection bag on the environmental performances of the food waste management chain in Italy. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between two alternative systems based on paper or bioplastic collection bags was carried out. It included the collection bags manufacturing and distribution, their use at the household, the transportation of collected food waste and its subsequent anaerobic digestion, including the valorisation of useful outputs and the management of residues. The two systems were modelled mainly with primary data related to the current management system and to tests performed on bags. The LCA was performed with two different modelling approaches applied in the environmental product declaration (EPD) system and in the product environmental footprint (PEF) studies, respectively. In the scenario representing the average conditions, higher environmental impacts are shown by the use of bioplastic bags compared to paper ones with the EPD approach (+257%/+576%). With the PEF approach, the differences between the two systems are lower (−55%/+133%). Moreover, paper bags could allow for further impact reductions assuming a decrease of the food waste collection frequency, allowed by higher weight losses and a lower generation of leachate and odour during the household storage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document