Double-blind randomized crossover trial of verapamil and propranolol in chronic stable angina

1983 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 1297-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Bowles ◽  
V.Bala Subramanian ◽  
Anthony B Davies ◽  
Edward B Raftery
1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Ezekowitz ◽  
Kenneth Hossack ◽  
Jawahar L. Mehta ◽  
Udho Thadani ◽  
Donald J. Weidler ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Hill ◽  
John T. O'Brien ◽  
Elizabeth Scott ◽  
C.Richard Conti ◽  
Carl J. Pepine

1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Southall ◽  
N R Nutt ◽  
R D Thomas

The effect of verapamil 120 mg t.d.s. was compared with propranolol 160 mg b.d. in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. Nineteen patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, using patient diaries, exercise-testing and ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Both drugs were given for 1 month. On average the number of attacks of angina was reduced equally by verapamil and propranolol. The degree of electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischaemia was decreased by the same amount, but verapamil was significantly more effective in prolonging the exercise time. Both drugs reduced the number of episodes of ST-segment depression during 24 hours of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, which was analyzed in nine patients. It is concluded that verapamil compares very favourably with propranolol in the treatment of stable angina, and is more beneficial in improving exercise capacity.


1993 ◽  
Vol 84 (s28) ◽  
pp. 22P-22P
Author(s):  
S Dubrey ◽  
J Song ◽  
T Hardman ◽  
J Hynd ◽  
N Grainger ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 1494-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Crean ◽  
Paolo Ribeiro ◽  
Filippo Crea ◽  
Graham J. Davies ◽  
Dorothy Ratcliffe ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofen Ruan ◽  
Yiping Li ◽  
Yuanlong Sun ◽  
Meijun Jia ◽  
Xiaowen Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) has become one of the biggest health problems in the world. Stable angina is a common clinical type of CHD with poor prognosis and high mortality. Although there are various interventions for stable angina, none of them can significantly reduce mortality. Both basic and clinical research have shown that Suxiao Jiuxin Pill (SJP) can relieve the symptoms of angina pectoris and improve the clinical efficacy, but there is a lack of high-quality clinical research to provide research-based evidence. We design a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SJP for stable angina. Methods/design This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and multicenter trial. The trial will enroll 324 participants with chronic stable angina (Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis syndrome). All participants will have received the conventional therapy of chronic stable angina. Participants will be randomized into two groups, conventional therapy plus SJP group and conventional therapy plus placebo group. Eligible participants will receive either SJP or placebo (five pills administered orally, three times daily) in addition to conventional treatment for 24 weeks. The primary outcomes are the symptom improvement rate of angina from baseline to 4 weeks after inclusion and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes are angina classification (CCS), improvement of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes, Seattle Angina Scale score, the dosage of emergency drugs and the stopping rate, and electrocardiogram (EKG) efficacy. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial. Discussion Integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine is commonly used for angina in China. This study will evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of SJP for angina. The results of the trial will provide high-level clinical research-based evidence for the application of SJP instable angina. Trial registration This study protocol was registered on 14 March 2019. The registration number is ChiCTR1900021876 on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document