“Weber's law” for position: the role of spatial frequency and contrast

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 2235-2250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Levi ◽  
Stanley A. Klein
Author(s):  
Andrew Haigh ◽  
Deborah Apthorp ◽  
Lewis A. Bizo

1986 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1908-1913 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Gleeson ◽  
T. Bendrick ◽  
D. P. White

Previous resistive load detection (RLD) studies have ignored the nose, the usual route of breathing. Weber's law predicts the delta R50 (the added load detectable on 50% of presentations) to be a fixed percent of the background resistance (R0) and thus the delta R50/R0 ratio (the Weber fraction) is constant. We have noted the nose to be sensitive to added load, we wondered if the nose might play a role in RLD. To determine whether this was true and to characterize the effects of changes in R0 in the range of normal nasal resistance (RN), we determined R0 and delta R50 using standard techniques under the following conditions: nose vs. decongested nose, nose vs. nose with added external R0 (3.0 and 8.0 cmH2O X l-1 X s), nose vs. anesthetized nose, nose vs. mouth, and mouth vs. mouth with added load (3 cmH2O X l-1 X s). We found that decongestant decreased RN [4.3 +/- 0.6 (SE) to 3.1 +/- 0.5 cmH2O X l-1 X s, P less than 0.05] and delta R50 (1.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.1 +/- 0.3 cmH2O X l-1 X s, P less than 0.05). When an external load of 3 cmH2O X l-1 X s was added to the nose, delta R50 did not change significantly (1.4 +/- 0.2 to 1.1 +/- 0.2 cmH2O X l-1 X s), but the Weber fraction decreased (0.28 +/- 0.05 to 0.15 +/- 0.03, P less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan J. Swift ◽  
Robert A. Smith

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Levi ◽  
Stanley A. Klein ◽  
Yen Lee Yap
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document